绘制水和社会研究的景观:兼容和互补学科的有前途的组合

WIREs Water Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1002/wat2.1701
Marc F. Muller, Maria Rusca, Leonardo Bertassello, Ellis Adams, Maura Allaire, Violeta Cabello Villarejo, Morgan Levy, Jenia Mukherjee, Yadu Pokhrel
{"title":"绘制水和社会研究的景观:兼容和互补学科的有前途的组合","authors":"Marc F. Muller, Maria Rusca, Leonardo Bertassello, Ellis Adams, Maura Allaire, Violeta Cabello Villarejo, Morgan Levy, Jenia Mukherjee, Yadu Pokhrel","doi":"10.1002/wat2.1701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coupled human-water systems (CHWS) are diverse and have been studied across a wide variety of disciplines. Integrating multiple disciplinary perspectives on CHWS provides a comprehensive and actionable understanding of these complex systems. While interdisciplinary integration has often remained elusive, specific combinations of disciplines might be comparably easier to integrate (compatible), and/or their combination might be particularly likely to uncover previously unobtainable insights (complementary). This paper systematically identifies such promising combinations by mapping disciplines along a common set of topical, philosophical, and methodological dimensions. It also identifies key challenges and lessons for multidisciplinary research teams seeking to integrate highly promising (complementary) but poorly compatible disciplines. Applied to eight disciplines that span the environmental physical sciences and the quantitative and qualitative social sciences, we found that promising combinations of disciplines identified by the typology broadly reproduce patterns of recent interdisciplinary collaborative research revealed by a bibliometric analysis. We also found that some disciplines are centrally located within the typology by being compatible and complementary to multiple other disciplines along distinct dimensions. This points to the potential for these disciplines to act as catalysts for wider interdisciplinary integration.","PeriodicalId":501223,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Water","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping the landscape of water and society research: Promising combinations of compatible and complementary disciplines\",\"authors\":\"Marc F. Muller, Maria Rusca, Leonardo Bertassello, Ellis Adams, Maura Allaire, Violeta Cabello Villarejo, Morgan Levy, Jenia Mukherjee, Yadu Pokhrel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wat2.1701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coupled human-water systems (CHWS) are diverse and have been studied across a wide variety of disciplines. Integrating multiple disciplinary perspectives on CHWS provides a comprehensive and actionable understanding of these complex systems. While interdisciplinary integration has often remained elusive, specific combinations of disciplines might be comparably easier to integrate (compatible), and/or their combination might be particularly likely to uncover previously unobtainable insights (complementary). This paper systematically identifies such promising combinations by mapping disciplines along a common set of topical, philosophical, and methodological dimensions. It also identifies key challenges and lessons for multidisciplinary research teams seeking to integrate highly promising (complementary) but poorly compatible disciplines. Applied to eight disciplines that span the environmental physical sciences and the quantitative and qualitative social sciences, we found that promising combinations of disciplines identified by the typology broadly reproduce patterns of recent interdisciplinary collaborative research revealed by a bibliometric analysis. We also found that some disciplines are centrally located within the typology by being compatible and complementary to multiple other disciplines along distinct dimensions. This points to the potential for these disciplines to act as catalysts for wider interdisciplinary integration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIREs Water\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIREs Water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

耦合人-水系统(CHWS)是多种多样的,已经在各种学科中进行了研究。综合多学科的角度对CHWS提供了这些复杂系统的全面和可操作的理解。虽然跨学科的集成通常仍然是难以捉摸的,但是学科的特定组合可能相对更容易集成(兼容),并且/或者它们的组合可能特别有可能发现以前无法获得的见解(互补)。本文系统地识别这样有前途的组合,通过绘制学科沿着一个共同的主题,哲学,和方法论的维度。它还确定了寻求整合非常有前途(互补)但兼容性差的学科的多学科研究团队面临的主要挑战和教训。应用于八个学科,涵盖环境物理科学和定量和定性社会科学,我们发现,由类型学确定的有前途的学科组合广泛地再现了文献计量学分析揭示的最近跨学科合作研究的模式。我们还发现,一些学科通过与其他多个学科沿着不同的维度兼容和互补,位于类型学的中心。这指出了这些学科作为更广泛的跨学科整合催化剂的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mapping the landscape of water and society research: Promising combinations of compatible and complementary disciplines

Mapping the landscape of water and society research: Promising combinations of compatible and complementary disciplines
Coupled human-water systems (CHWS) are diverse and have been studied across a wide variety of disciplines. Integrating multiple disciplinary perspectives on CHWS provides a comprehensive and actionable understanding of these complex systems. While interdisciplinary integration has often remained elusive, specific combinations of disciplines might be comparably easier to integrate (compatible), and/or their combination might be particularly likely to uncover previously unobtainable insights (complementary). This paper systematically identifies such promising combinations by mapping disciplines along a common set of topical, philosophical, and methodological dimensions. It also identifies key challenges and lessons for multidisciplinary research teams seeking to integrate highly promising (complementary) but poorly compatible disciplines. Applied to eight disciplines that span the environmental physical sciences and the quantitative and qualitative social sciences, we found that promising combinations of disciplines identified by the typology broadly reproduce patterns of recent interdisciplinary collaborative research revealed by a bibliometric analysis. We also found that some disciplines are centrally located within the typology by being compatible and complementary to multiple other disciplines along distinct dimensions. This points to the potential for these disciplines to act as catalysts for wider interdisciplinary integration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信