技术观点:特别事务:它们是什么以及我们为什么应该关心

Kenneth Salem
{"title":"技术观点:特别事务:它们是什么以及我们为什么应该关心","authors":"Kenneth Salem","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3604437.3604439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most database research papers are prescriptive. They identify a technical problem and show us how to solve it. They present new algorithms, theorems, and evaluations of prototypes. Other papers follow a different path: descriptive rather than prescriptive. They tell us how data systems behave in practice, and how they are actually used. They employ a different set of tools, such as surveys, software analyses or user studies. These papers are much rarer at database research conferences, and they're all the more valuable for that.</p>","PeriodicalId":501169,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGMOD Record","volume":"249 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVE: Ad Hoc Transactions: What They Are and Why We Should Care\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Salem\",\"doi\":\"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3604437.3604439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Most database research papers are prescriptive. They identify a technical problem and show us how to solve it. They present new algorithms, theorems, and evaluations of prototypes. Other papers follow a different path: descriptive rather than prescriptive. They tell us how data systems behave in practice, and how they are actually used. They employ a different set of tools, such as surveys, software analyses or user studies. These papers are much rarer at database research conferences, and they're all the more valuable for that.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGMOD Record\",\"volume\":\"249 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGMOD Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3604437.3604439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGMOD Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3604437.3604439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数数据库研究论文都是规定性的。他们指出一个技术问题,并告诉我们如何解决它。他们提出了新的算法、定理和原型的评估。其他论文则走了一条不同的道路:描述而非规定。它们告诉我们数据系统在实践中是如何运行的,以及它们实际上是如何被使用的。他们使用一套不同的工具,如调查、软件分析或用户研究。这些论文在数据库研究会议上非常罕见,因此它们更有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVE: Ad Hoc Transactions: What They Are and Why We Should Care

Most database research papers are prescriptive. They identify a technical problem and show us how to solve it. They present new algorithms, theorems, and evaluations of prototypes. Other papers follow a different path: descriptive rather than prescriptive. They tell us how data systems behave in practice, and how they are actually used. They employ a different set of tools, such as surveys, software analyses or user studies. These papers are much rarer at database research conferences, and they're all the more valuable for that.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信