{"title":"机器学习生命周期工件的管理:调查:ACM SIGMOD记录:第51卷,第4号","authors":"Marius Schlegel, Kai-Uwe Sattler","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582302.3582306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The explorative and iterative nature of developing and operating ML applications leads to a variety of artifacts, such as datasets, features, models, hyperparameters, metrics, software, configurations, and logs. In order to enable comparability, reproducibility, and traceability of these artifacts across the ML lifecycle steps and iterations, systems and tools have been developed to support their collection, storage, and management. It is often not obvious what precise functional scope such systems offer so that the comparison and the estimation of synergy effects between candidates are quite challenging. In this paper, we aim to give an overview of systems and platforms which support the management of ML lifecycle artifacts. Based on a systematic literature review, we derive assessment criteria and apply them to a representative selection of more than 60 systems and platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":501169,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGMOD Record","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Machine Learning Lifecycle Artifacts: A Survey: ACM SIGMOD Record: Vol 51, No 4\",\"authors\":\"Marius Schlegel, Kai-Uwe Sattler\",\"doi\":\"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582302.3582306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The explorative and iterative nature of developing and operating ML applications leads to a variety of artifacts, such as datasets, features, models, hyperparameters, metrics, software, configurations, and logs. In order to enable comparability, reproducibility, and traceability of these artifacts across the ML lifecycle steps and iterations, systems and tools have been developed to support their collection, storage, and management. It is often not obvious what precise functional scope such systems offer so that the comparison and the estimation of synergy effects between candidates are quite challenging. In this paper, we aim to give an overview of systems and platforms which support the management of ML lifecycle artifacts. Based on a systematic literature review, we derive assessment criteria and apply them to a representative selection of more than 60 systems and platforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGMOD Record\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGMOD Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582302.3582306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGMOD Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582302.3582306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of Machine Learning Lifecycle Artifacts: A Survey: ACM SIGMOD Record: Vol 51, No 4
The explorative and iterative nature of developing and operating ML applications leads to a variety of artifacts, such as datasets, features, models, hyperparameters, metrics, software, configurations, and logs. In order to enable comparability, reproducibility, and traceability of these artifacts across the ML lifecycle steps and iterations, systems and tools have been developed to support their collection, storage, and management. It is often not obvious what precise functional scope such systems offer so that the comparison and the estimation of synergy effects between candidates are quite challenging. In this paper, we aim to give an overview of systems and platforms which support the management of ML lifecycle artifacts. Based on a systematic literature review, we derive assessment criteria and apply them to a representative selection of more than 60 systems and platforms.