{"title":"我们的会议审查委员会联系如何?","authors":"Sourav S. Bhowmick","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582302.3582324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dense co-authorship network formed by the review board members of a conference may adversely impact the quality and integrity of the review process. In this report, we shed light on the topological characteristics of such networks for three major data management conference venues. Our results show all these venues give rise to dense networks with a large giant component. We advocate to rethink the traditional way review boards are formed to mitigate the emergence of dense networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":501169,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGMOD Record","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Connected Are Our Conference Review Boards?\",\"authors\":\"Sourav S. Bhowmick\",\"doi\":\"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582302.3582324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Dense co-authorship network formed by the review board members of a conference may adversely impact the quality and integrity of the review process. In this report, we shed light on the topological characteristics of such networks for three major data management conference venues. Our results show all these venues give rise to dense networks with a large giant component. We advocate to rethink the traditional way review boards are formed to mitigate the emergence of dense networks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGMOD Record\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGMOD Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582302.3582324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGMOD Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582302.3582324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dense co-authorship network formed by the review board members of a conference may adversely impact the quality and integrity of the review process. In this report, we shed light on the topological characteristics of such networks for three major data management conference venues. Our results show all these venues give rise to dense networks with a large giant component. We advocate to rethink the traditional way review boards are formed to mitigate the emergence of dense networks.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
