{"title":"哪些舒伯特品种是海森伯格品种?","authors":"Laura Escobar, Martha Precup, John Shareshian","doi":"10.1007/s00031-023-09825-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>After proving that every Schubert variety in the full flag variety of a complex reductive group <i>G</i> is a general Hessenberg variety, we show that not all such Schubert varieties are adjoint Hessenberg varieties. In fact, in types A and C, we provide pattern avoidance criteria implying that the proportion of Schubert varieties that are adjoint Hessenberg varieties approaches zero as the rank of <i>G</i> increases. We show also that in type A, some Schubert varieties are not isomorphic to any adjoint Hessenberg variety.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which Schubert Varieties are Hessenberg Varieties?\",\"authors\":\"Laura Escobar, Martha Precup, John Shareshian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00031-023-09825-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>After proving that every Schubert variety in the full flag variety of a complex reductive group <i>G</i> is a general Hessenberg variety, we show that not all such Schubert varieties are adjoint Hessenberg varieties. In fact, in types A and C, we provide pattern avoidance criteria implying that the proportion of Schubert varieties that are adjoint Hessenberg varieties approaches zero as the rank of <i>G</i> increases. We show also that in type A, some Schubert varieties are not isomorphic to any adjoint Hessenberg variety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00031-023-09825-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00031-023-09825-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Which Schubert Varieties are Hessenberg Varieties?
After proving that every Schubert variety in the full flag variety of a complex reductive group G is a general Hessenberg variety, we show that not all such Schubert varieties are adjoint Hessenberg varieties. In fact, in types A and C, we provide pattern avoidance criteria implying that the proportion of Schubert varieties that are adjoint Hessenberg varieties approaches zero as the rank of G increases. We show also that in type A, some Schubert varieties are not isomorphic to any adjoint Hessenberg variety.