一阶模态逻辑的可判定片段:两变量项模态逻辑

IF 0.7 4区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Anantha Padmanabha, R. Ramanujam
{"title":"一阶模态逻辑的可判定片段:两变量项模态逻辑","authors":"Anantha Padmanabha, R. Ramanujam","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3593584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>First order modal logic (𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫)</b> is built by extending <b>First Order Logic (𝖥𝖮)</b> with modal operators. A typical formula is of the form \\(\\forall x \\exists y \\Box P(x,y)\\). Not only is 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫 undecidable, even simple fragments like that of restriction to unary predicate symbols, guarded fragment and two variable fragment, which are all decidable for 𝖥𝖮 become undecidable for 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫. In this paper we study <b>Term Modal logic (𝖳𝖬𝖫)</b> which allows modal operators to be indexed by terms. A typical formula is of the form \\(\\forall x \\exists y~\\Box _x P(x,y)\\). There is a close correspondence between 𝖳𝖬𝖫 and 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫 and we explore this relationship in detail in the paper.</p><p>In contrast to 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫, we show that the two variable fragment (without constants, equality) of 𝖳𝖬𝖫 is decidable. Further, we prove that adding a single constant makes the two variable fragment of 𝖳𝖬𝖫 undecidable. On the other hand, when equality is added to the logic, it loses the finite model property.</p>","PeriodicalId":50916,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic","volume":"38 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Decidable Fragment of First Order Modal Logic: Two Variable Term Modal Logic\",\"authors\":\"Anantha Padmanabha, R. Ramanujam\",\"doi\":\"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3593584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>First order modal logic (𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫)</b> is built by extending <b>First Order Logic (𝖥𝖮)</b> with modal operators. A typical formula is of the form \\\\(\\\\forall x \\\\exists y \\\\Box P(x,y)\\\\). Not only is 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫 undecidable, even simple fragments like that of restriction to unary predicate symbols, guarded fragment and two variable fragment, which are all decidable for 𝖥𝖮 become undecidable for 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫. In this paper we study <b>Term Modal logic (𝖳𝖬𝖫)</b> which allows modal operators to be indexed by terms. A typical formula is of the form \\\\(\\\\forall x \\\\exists y~\\\\Box _x P(x,y)\\\\). There is a close correspondence between 𝖳𝖬𝖫 and 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫 and we explore this relationship in detail in the paper.</p><p>In contrast to 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫, we show that the two variable fragment (without constants, equality) of 𝖳𝖬𝖫 is decidable. Further, we prove that adding a single constant makes the two variable fragment of 𝖳𝖬𝖫 undecidable. On the other hand, when equality is added to the logic, it loses the finite model property.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic\",\"volume\":\"38 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3593584\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3593584","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一阶模态逻辑(𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫)是通过使用模态运算符扩展一阶逻辑(𝖥𝖮)来构建的。一个典型的公式是\(\forall x \exists y \Box P(x,y)\)。不仅𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫是不可判定的,就连对于𝖥𝖮来说都是可判定的限制一元谓词符号、保护片段和双变量片段这样的简单片段,对于𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫来说都是不可判定的。在本文中,我们研究了项模态逻辑(𝖳𝖬𝖫),它允许模态运算符按项索引。一个典型的公式是\(\forall x \exists y~\Box _x P(x,y)\)。𝖳𝖬𝖫和𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫之间有密切的对应关系,我们在本文中详细探讨了这种关系。与𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫相反,我们证明了𝖳𝖬𝖫的两个变量片段(没有常数,相等)是可决定的。进一步,我们证明了添加单个常数使𝖳𝖬𝖫的两个变量片段不可确定。另一方面,当在逻辑中加入等式时,它就失去了有限模型的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Decidable Fragment of First Order Modal Logic: Two Variable Term Modal Logic

First order modal logic (𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫) is built by extending First Order Logic (𝖥𝖮) with modal operators. A typical formula is of the form \(\forall x \exists y \Box P(x,y)\). Not only is 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫 undecidable, even simple fragments like that of restriction to unary predicate symbols, guarded fragment and two variable fragment, which are all decidable for 𝖥𝖮 become undecidable for 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫. In this paper we study Term Modal logic (𝖳𝖬𝖫) which allows modal operators to be indexed by terms. A typical formula is of the form \(\forall x \exists y~\Box _x P(x,y)\). There is a close correspondence between 𝖳𝖬𝖫 and 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫 and we explore this relationship in detail in the paper.

In contrast to 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫, we show that the two variable fragment (without constants, equality) of 𝖳𝖬𝖫 is decidable. Further, we prove that adding a single constant makes the two variable fragment of 𝖳𝖬𝖫 undecidable. On the other hand, when equality is added to the logic, it loses the finite model property.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: TOCL welcomes submissions related to all aspects of logic as it pertains to topics in computer science. This area has a great tradition in computer science. Several researchers who earned the ACM Turing award have also contributed to this field, namely Edgar Codd (relational database systems), Stephen Cook (complexity of logical theories), Edsger W. Dijkstra, Robert W. Floyd, Tony Hoare, Amir Pnueli, Dana Scott, Edmond M. Clarke, Allen E. Emerson, and Joseph Sifakis (program logics, program derivation and verification, programming languages semantics), Robin Milner (interactive theorem proving, concurrency calculi, and functional programming), and John McCarthy (functional programming and logics in AI). Logic continues to play an important role in computer science and has permeated several of its areas, including artificial intelligence, computational complexity, database systems, and programming languages. The Editorial Board of this journal seeks and hopes to attract high-quality submissions in all the above-mentioned areas of computational logic so that TOCL becomes the standard reference in the field. Both theoretical and applied papers are sought. Submissions showing novel use of logic in computer science are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信