按子女年龄和出生顺序分配对父母的财政支持反映了哪些政策功能?对28个欧洲国家的分析

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Kristijan Fidanovski
{"title":"按子女年龄和出生顺序分配对父母的财政支持反映了哪些政策功能?对28个欧洲国家的分析","authors":"Kristijan Fidanovski","doi":"10.1111/spol.12978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motivated by the growing prominence of fertility incentivisation and long-term child development in European family policymaking, this paper examines the distribution of financial support for parents over the course of childhood and between birth orders in Europe. We use the term ‘older-oriented age bias’ to refer to support that is more generous for older children and the term ‘younger-oriented age bias’ for more generous support for younger children. Similarly, we refer to distribution patterns tilted towards later birth orders as ‘later-oriented parity bias’ and to those that favour earlier birth orders as ‘earlier-oriented parity bias’. Based on a list of four classical policy functions of financial support for parents (child cost compensation, fertility incentivisation, child poverty reduction, and child development), we formulate six (sets of) hypotheses for the age and parity distribution of financial support for parents. To assess these distribution patterns, we examine monthly financial support (allowance- and tax-based) for the first four birth orders at child ages 2, 9, and 17 in low-income and middle-income households across 28 European countries as of January 2021. We find that European welfare states typically provide more generous support for younger children, while the support distribution in terms of birth orders depends on pre-support household income. We also find considerable cross-country heterogeneity, with fertility incentivisation and (especially) child development being reflected by more countries than child cost compensation and poverty reduction. Our analysis sheds light on previously underexplored trends and implications in the design of financial support for parents in Europe.","PeriodicalId":47858,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy & Administration","volume":"19 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What policy functions are reflected in the distribution of financial support for parents by child age and birth order? An analysis of 28 European countries\",\"authors\":\"Kristijan Fidanovski\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/spol.12978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Motivated by the growing prominence of fertility incentivisation and long-term child development in European family policymaking, this paper examines the distribution of financial support for parents over the course of childhood and between birth orders in Europe. We use the term ‘older-oriented age bias’ to refer to support that is more generous for older children and the term ‘younger-oriented age bias’ for more generous support for younger children. Similarly, we refer to distribution patterns tilted towards later birth orders as ‘later-oriented parity bias’ and to those that favour earlier birth orders as ‘earlier-oriented parity bias’. Based on a list of four classical policy functions of financial support for parents (child cost compensation, fertility incentivisation, child poverty reduction, and child development), we formulate six (sets of) hypotheses for the age and parity distribution of financial support for parents. To assess these distribution patterns, we examine monthly financial support (allowance- and tax-based) for the first four birth orders at child ages 2, 9, and 17 in low-income and middle-income households across 28 European countries as of January 2021. We find that European welfare states typically provide more generous support for younger children, while the support distribution in terms of birth orders depends on pre-support household income. We also find considerable cross-country heterogeneity, with fertility incentivisation and (especially) child development being reflected by more countries than child cost compensation and poverty reduction. Our analysis sheds light on previously underexplored trends and implications in the design of financial support for parents in Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Policy & Administration\",\"volume\":\"19 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Policy & Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12978\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy & Administration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12978","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于欧洲家庭政策制定中生育激励和长期儿童发展的重要性日益突出,本文研究了欧洲在童年时期和出生顺序之间对父母的财政支持的分布。我们用“以年龄为导向的年龄偏见”来指对年龄较大的孩子更慷慨的支持,用“以年龄较小的孩子为导向的年龄偏见”来指对年龄较小的孩子更慷慨的支持。同样,我们将倾向于晚出生顺序的分布模式称为“晚出生顺序取向的胎次偏差”,将倾向于早出生顺序的分布模式称为“早出生顺序取向的胎次偏差”。基于对父母财政支持的四种经典政策功能(子女成本补偿、生育激励、儿童减贫和儿童发展)的分析,我们对父母财政支持的年龄和性别分布提出了六个假设。为了评估这些分布模式,我们研究了截至2021年1月28个欧洲国家中低收入和中等收入家庭在儿童2岁、9岁和17岁时的前四个出生订单的每月财政支持(基于津贴和税收)。我们发现,欧洲福利国家通常为年龄较小的儿童提供更慷慨的支持,而出生顺序方面的支持分配取决于支持前的家庭收入。我们还发现了相当大的跨国异质性,更多的国家反映了生育激励和(特别是)儿童发展,而不是儿童成本补偿和减贫。我们的分析揭示了以前未被充分探索的趋势和对欧洲父母财政支持设计的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What policy functions are reflected in the distribution of financial support for parents by child age and birth order? An analysis of 28 European countries
Motivated by the growing prominence of fertility incentivisation and long-term child development in European family policymaking, this paper examines the distribution of financial support for parents over the course of childhood and between birth orders in Europe. We use the term ‘older-oriented age bias’ to refer to support that is more generous for older children and the term ‘younger-oriented age bias’ for more generous support for younger children. Similarly, we refer to distribution patterns tilted towards later birth orders as ‘later-oriented parity bias’ and to those that favour earlier birth orders as ‘earlier-oriented parity bias’. Based on a list of four classical policy functions of financial support for parents (child cost compensation, fertility incentivisation, child poverty reduction, and child development), we formulate six (sets of) hypotheses for the age and parity distribution of financial support for parents. To assess these distribution patterns, we examine monthly financial support (allowance- and tax-based) for the first four birth orders at child ages 2, 9, and 17 in low-income and middle-income households across 28 European countries as of January 2021. We find that European welfare states typically provide more generous support for younger children, while the support distribution in terms of birth orders depends on pre-support household income. We also find considerable cross-country heterogeneity, with fertility incentivisation and (especially) child development being reflected by more countries than child cost compensation and poverty reduction. Our analysis sheds light on previously underexplored trends and implications in the design of financial support for parents in Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Social Policy & Administration is the longest established journal in its field. Whilst remaining faithful to its tradition in academic excellence, the journal also seeks to engender debate about topical and controversial issues. Typical numbers contain papers clustered around a theme. The journal is international in scope. Quality contributions are received from scholars world-wide and cover social policy issues not only in Europe but in the USA, Canada, Australia and Asia Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信