土壤微生物对土壤流失和径流的可控性研究进展

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi, Atefeh Jafarpoor, Mehdi Homaee, Sudabeh Gharemahmudli
{"title":"土壤微生物对土壤流失和径流的可控性研究进展","authors":"Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi, Atefeh Jafarpoor, Mehdi Homaee, Sudabeh Gharemahmudli","doi":"10.1016/j.ecohyd.2023.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Some arguments on the durability, dynamism, applicability, cost, and environmental aspects of chemical and physical additives confirm the general tendency to apply biological amendments for soil and water resource conservation. In this regard, the application of biological soil crusts is regarded as one of the biological and environmentally oriented methods to improve the soil hydrological behavior, cohesion, aggregation, and erodibility in such a way as to withstand destructive agents for soil and water loss. Despite general agreement on the beneficial effects of microorganisms in reducing soil loss and runoff, no unique conclusion has been drawn to minutely report the extension and consequences of applying soil microorganisms in soil and water conservation. In the current endeavor, out of too many reports found following insight searches in the public domains, 77 journal papers published from 1990 to 2023 on the relationship between microorganisms on soil loss and runoff control were ultimately reviewed. Accordingly, the first successful research was reported in 2003. Our further inspections showed that more than 90 % of the investigations had been conducted in China, Spain, Iran, the United States, Palestine, and the west of the Jordan River. In 82 % of the internationally published investigations, the application of cyanobacteria for conserving soil and water resources has been either preferred or recommended. Overall, the outcome of our inspection showed that microorganisms have been effective in controlling runoff and soil loss, due to which a global increasing tendency to extend soil microorganisms-based approaches is seen for soil and water resources management.</p>","PeriodicalId":56070,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controllability of soil loss and runoff using soil microorganisms: A review\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi, Atefeh Jafarpoor, Mehdi Homaee, Sudabeh Gharemahmudli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecohyd.2023.11.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Some arguments on the durability, dynamism, applicability, cost, and environmental aspects of chemical and physical additives confirm the general tendency to apply biological amendments for soil and water resource conservation. In this regard, the application of biological soil crusts is regarded as one of the biological and environmentally oriented methods to improve the soil hydrological behavior, cohesion, aggregation, and erodibility in such a way as to withstand destructive agents for soil and water loss. Despite general agreement on the beneficial effects of microorganisms in reducing soil loss and runoff, no unique conclusion has been drawn to minutely report the extension and consequences of applying soil microorganisms in soil and water conservation. In the current endeavor, out of too many reports found following insight searches in the public domains, 77 journal papers published from 1990 to 2023 on the relationship between microorganisms on soil loss and runoff control were ultimately reviewed. Accordingly, the first successful research was reported in 2003. Our further inspections showed that more than 90 % of the investigations had been conducted in China, Spain, Iran, the United States, Palestine, and the west of the Jordan River. In 82 % of the internationally published investigations, the application of cyanobacteria for conserving soil and water resources has been either preferred or recommended. Overall, the outcome of our inspection showed that microorganisms have been effective in controlling runoff and soil loss, due to which a global increasing tendency to extend soil microorganisms-based approaches is seen for soil and water resources management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2023.11.006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2023.11.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于化学和物理添加剂的耐久性、动态性、适用性、成本和环境方面的一些争论证实了应用生物改良剂来保持水土资源的总体趋势。在这方面,生物土壤结皮的应用被认为是一种以生物和环境为导向的方法,可以改善土壤的水文行为、凝聚力、聚集性和可蚀性,从而抵御水土流失的破坏剂。尽管普遍同意微生物在减少土壤流失和径流方面的有益作用,但没有得出独特的结论来详细报道土壤微生物在水土保持中的推广和后果。在目前的努力中,从公共领域的洞察力搜索中发现的太多报告中,最终审查了1990年至2023年发表的77篇关于微生物与土壤流失和径流控制之间关系的期刊论文。因此,2003年报道了第一次成功的研究。我们进一步的检查表明,90%以上的调查是在中国、西班牙、伊朗、美国、巴勒斯坦和约旦河西岸进行的。在国际上发表的82%的调查中,蓝藻应用于水土资源保护已被首选或推荐。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,微生物在控制径流和土壤流失方面是有效的,因此,在全球范围内,基于土壤微生物的方法越来越多地用于土壤和水资源管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controllability of soil loss and runoff using soil microorganisms: A review

Some arguments on the durability, dynamism, applicability, cost, and environmental aspects of chemical and physical additives confirm the general tendency to apply biological amendments for soil and water resource conservation. In this regard, the application of biological soil crusts is regarded as one of the biological and environmentally oriented methods to improve the soil hydrological behavior, cohesion, aggregation, and erodibility in such a way as to withstand destructive agents for soil and water loss. Despite general agreement on the beneficial effects of microorganisms in reducing soil loss and runoff, no unique conclusion has been drawn to minutely report the extension and consequences of applying soil microorganisms in soil and water conservation. In the current endeavor, out of too many reports found following insight searches in the public domains, 77 journal papers published from 1990 to 2023 on the relationship between microorganisms on soil loss and runoff control were ultimately reviewed. Accordingly, the first successful research was reported in 2003. Our further inspections showed that more than 90 % of the investigations had been conducted in China, Spain, Iran, the United States, Palestine, and the west of the Jordan River. In 82 % of the internationally published investigations, the application of cyanobacteria for conserving soil and water resources has been either preferred or recommended. Overall, the outcome of our inspection showed that microorganisms have been effective in controlling runoff and soil loss, due to which a global increasing tendency to extend soil microorganisms-based approaches is seen for soil and water resources management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology is an international journal that aims to advance ecohydrology as the study of the interplay between ecological and hydrological processes from molecular to river basin scales, and to promote its implementation as an integrative management tool to harmonize societal needs with biosphere potential.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信