外来树种对陆生苔藓植物丰度和多样性的影响

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
Marcin K. Dyderski, Andrzej M. Jagodziński
{"title":"外来树种对陆生苔藓植物丰度和多样性的影响","authors":"Marcin K. Dyderski, Andrzej M. Jagodziński","doi":"10.1007/s12224-020-09384-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bryophytes comprise an important element of temperate forest biodiversity and functioning. Although numerous studies reported impacts of alien tree species on understorey vegetation, few focused on impacts on bryophytes. Here we checked whether three invasive tree species in Europe (<i>Prunus serotina</i> Ehrh., <i>Quercus rubra</i> L. and <i>Robinia pseudoacacia</i> L.) influence terricolous bryophyte communities, alpha and beta diversity, and cover. We used a set of 186 study plots in western Poland with data on the cover of bryophytes species, as well as light availability, soil C:N ratio and pH. We found that light availability was the main driver of bryophyte species richness, cover and composition. Poor <i>Pinus sylvestris</i> L. forests invaded by <i>P. serotina</i> hosted more species and higher species richness than non-invaded <i>P. sylvestris</i> forests, while forests invaded by <i>Q. rubra</i> and <i>R. pseudoacacia</i> hosted fewer species than native forest types. Low differences among forest types studied resulted from small pools of species and the presence of generalist species. <i>Fagus sylvatica</i> L. forest, <i>Q. rubra</i> and <i>R. pseudoacacia</i> forests hosted the smallest number of species, while the most species rich stands were poor <i>P. sylvestris</i> forest invaded by <i>P. serotina</i> and non-invaded <i>P. sylvestris</i> forests. We concluded that light limitation by invasive species might be more important than dominant tree species identity in limiting terricolous bryophyte species richness and abundance. This requires further studies, accounting for varied abundances of invasive tree species. Therefore, the conservation of sites with high terricolous bryophyte biodiversity needs to be focused on canopy cover.</p>","PeriodicalId":12296,"journal":{"name":"Folia Geobotanica","volume":"257 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of alien tree species on the abundance and diversity of terricolous bryophytes\",\"authors\":\"Marcin K. Dyderski, Andrzej M. Jagodziński\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12224-020-09384-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bryophytes comprise an important element of temperate forest biodiversity and functioning. Although numerous studies reported impacts of alien tree species on understorey vegetation, few focused on impacts on bryophytes. Here we checked whether three invasive tree species in Europe (<i>Prunus serotina</i> Ehrh., <i>Quercus rubra</i> L. and <i>Robinia pseudoacacia</i> L.) influence terricolous bryophyte communities, alpha and beta diversity, and cover. We used a set of 186 study plots in western Poland with data on the cover of bryophytes species, as well as light availability, soil C:N ratio and pH. We found that light availability was the main driver of bryophyte species richness, cover and composition. Poor <i>Pinus sylvestris</i> L. forests invaded by <i>P. serotina</i> hosted more species and higher species richness than non-invaded <i>P. sylvestris</i> forests, while forests invaded by <i>Q. rubra</i> and <i>R. pseudoacacia</i> hosted fewer species than native forest types. Low differences among forest types studied resulted from small pools of species and the presence of generalist species. <i>Fagus sylvatica</i> L. forest, <i>Q. rubra</i> and <i>R. pseudoacacia</i> forests hosted the smallest number of species, while the most species rich stands were poor <i>P. sylvestris</i> forest invaded by <i>P. serotina</i> and non-invaded <i>P. sylvestris</i> forests. We concluded that light limitation by invasive species might be more important than dominant tree species identity in limiting terricolous bryophyte species richness and abundance. This requires further studies, accounting for varied abundances of invasive tree species. Therefore, the conservation of sites with high terricolous bryophyte biodiversity needs to be focused on canopy cover.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folia Geobotanica\",\"volume\":\"257 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folia Geobotanica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-020-09384-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Geobotanica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-020-09384-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

苔藓植物是温带森林生物多样性和功能的重要组成部分。尽管大量研究报道了外来树种对林下植被的影响,但对苔藓植物影响的研究很少。本文对欧洲的三种入侵树种(Prunus servtina Ehrh)进行了研究。红栎(Quercus rubra L.)和刺槐(Robinia pseudoacacia L.)对陆生苔藓植物群落、α和β多样性和盖度的影响。通过对波兰西部地区186个样地的苔藓植物覆盖、光有效性、土壤C:N比和ph的研究,发现光有效性是苔藓植物物种丰富度、覆盖和组成的主要驱动因素。与未入侵的西洋松林相比,被浆液瓢虫入侵的林分较差的西洋松林寄主物种较多,物种丰富度较高,而被红松和刺槐入侵的林分寄主物种较少。所研究的森林类型之间的差异较小,这是由于物种池较小和存在通才物种。林分中物种数量最少的是油桐林、红木林和刺槐林,而物种最丰富的林分则是被浆麻和未被入侵的林分。结果表明,在限制陆生苔藓物种丰富度和丰度方面,外来入侵物种的光照限制可能比优势树种的身份更重要。这需要进一步的研究,考虑到入侵树种的不同丰度。因此,陆生苔藓生物多样性高的地点的保护应以冠层覆盖为重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impacts of alien tree species on the abundance and diversity of terricolous bryophytes

Bryophytes comprise an important element of temperate forest biodiversity and functioning. Although numerous studies reported impacts of alien tree species on understorey vegetation, few focused on impacts on bryophytes. Here we checked whether three invasive tree species in Europe (Prunus serotina Ehrh., Quercus rubra L. and Robinia pseudoacacia L.) influence terricolous bryophyte communities, alpha and beta diversity, and cover. We used a set of 186 study plots in western Poland with data on the cover of bryophytes species, as well as light availability, soil C:N ratio and pH. We found that light availability was the main driver of bryophyte species richness, cover and composition. Poor Pinus sylvestris L. forests invaded by P. serotina hosted more species and higher species richness than non-invaded P. sylvestris forests, while forests invaded by Q. rubra and R. pseudoacacia hosted fewer species than native forest types. Low differences among forest types studied resulted from small pools of species and the presence of generalist species. Fagus sylvatica L. forest, Q. rubra and R. pseudoacacia forests hosted the smallest number of species, while the most species rich stands were poor P. sylvestris forest invaded by P. serotina and non-invaded P. sylvestris forests. We concluded that light limitation by invasive species might be more important than dominant tree species identity in limiting terricolous bryophyte species richness and abundance. This requires further studies, accounting for varied abundances of invasive tree species. Therefore, the conservation of sites with high terricolous bryophyte biodiversity needs to be focused on canopy cover.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Folia Geobotanica
Folia Geobotanica 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Folia Geobotanica publishes articles in vegetation science, plant ecology and plant systematics, including the topics of temporal community patterns, population and ecosystem ecology, and invasion and conservation ecology. Within the field of plant systematics, Folia Geobotanica welcomes papers on systematic and evolutionary botany, including phylogenetic reconstructions, phylogeographic and biogeographic inferences, studies of microevolutionary processes, taxonomic studies, and broader taxonomic revisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信