了解LIBOR丑闻:历史、道德和技术

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Xing Huan, Gary John Previts, Antonio Parbonetti
{"title":"了解LIBOR丑闻:历史、道德和技术","authors":"Xing Huan, Gary John Previts, Antonio Parbonetti","doi":"10.1057/s41261-022-00205-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the conception of banking regulation through the lens of the LIBOR scandal. The narrative of the scandal addresses the debate surrounding the public versus private view of banking regulation. Employing an analytical framework developed through reassembling prevailing regulation theories that is contextualized to the banking industry, we analyze the historical, ethical, and technological aspects of the LIBOR scandal and subsequent reform. We argue that the narrative of the LIBOR scandal represents a typical regulatory capture in the private interest view of regulation. However, the benchmark reform appears to concur with the recent paradigm shift toward the public interest approach to banking regulation that involves more intrusive and detailed supervision with a focus on structural reforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":15105,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking Regulation","volume":"22 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the LIBOR scandal: the historical, the ethical, and the technological\",\"authors\":\"Xing Huan, Gary John Previts, Antonio Parbonetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41261-022-00205-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article examines the conception of banking regulation through the lens of the LIBOR scandal. The narrative of the scandal addresses the debate surrounding the public versus private view of banking regulation. Employing an analytical framework developed through reassembling prevailing regulation theories that is contextualized to the banking industry, we analyze the historical, ethical, and technological aspects of the LIBOR scandal and subsequent reform. We argue that the narrative of the LIBOR scandal represents a typical regulatory capture in the private interest view of regulation. However, the benchmark reform appears to concur with the recent paradigm shift toward the public interest approach to banking regulation that involves more intrusive and detailed supervision with a focus on structural reforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Banking Regulation\",\"volume\":\"22 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Banking Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00205-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Banking Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00205-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过LIBOR丑闻的镜头审视银行监管的概念。对这桩丑闻的叙述涉及到围绕公众和私人对银行业监管看法的辩论。通过重组银行业背景下的现行监管理论,我们采用了一个分析框架,分析了LIBOR丑闻和随后改革的历史、道德和技术方面。我们认为,LIBOR丑闻的叙述代表了私人利益监管观点中典型的监管捕获。然而,基准改革似乎与最近银行监管模式的转变相一致,即以公共利益为导向,对银行进行更深入、更详细的监管,重点放在结构性改革上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Understanding the LIBOR scandal: the historical, the ethical, and the technological

Understanding the LIBOR scandal: the historical, the ethical, and the technological

This article examines the conception of banking regulation through the lens of the LIBOR scandal. The narrative of the scandal addresses the debate surrounding the public versus private view of banking regulation. Employing an analytical framework developed through reassembling prevailing regulation theories that is contextualized to the banking industry, we analyze the historical, ethical, and technological aspects of the LIBOR scandal and subsequent reform. We argue that the narrative of the LIBOR scandal represents a typical regulatory capture in the private interest view of regulation. However, the benchmark reform appears to concur with the recent paradigm shift toward the public interest approach to banking regulation that involves more intrusive and detailed supervision with a focus on structural reforms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Under the guidance of its highly respected Editors and an eminent and truly international Editorial Board?Journal of Banking Regulation?has established itself as one of the leading sources of authoritative and detailed information on all aspects of law and regulation affecting banking institutions.Journal of Banking Regulation?publishes in each quarterly issue detailed briefings analyses and updates which are of direct relevance to practitioners working in the field while meeting the highest intellectual standards.Journal of Banking Regulation?publishes the latest thinking and best practice on:Basel I II and IIIModels for banking supervisionInternational accounting standardsDeposit protectionEnforcement decisions in banking regulation and supervisionCross-border competition in banking servicesCorporate governance in banksHarmonisation in banking marketsSupervising credit riskAnti-money laundering legislation and regulationsMonetary integrationRisk capital and capital adequacySystemic risk in banking operationsCross-border regulationCross-border bank insolvencyModels for banking riskEssential reading for:central bankersbanking supervisorsfinancial regulatorsbankerscompliance officersheads of risk managementpolicy makersbank associationslawyers specialising in banking lawaccountantsinternal and external bank auditorsacademics and researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信