{"title":"了解LIBOR丑闻:历史、道德和技术","authors":"Xing Huan, Gary John Previts, Antonio Parbonetti","doi":"10.1057/s41261-022-00205-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the conception of banking regulation through the lens of the LIBOR scandal. The narrative of the scandal addresses the debate surrounding the public versus private view of banking regulation. Employing an analytical framework developed through reassembling prevailing regulation theories that is contextualized to the banking industry, we analyze the historical, ethical, and technological aspects of the LIBOR scandal and subsequent reform. We argue that the narrative of the LIBOR scandal represents a typical regulatory capture in the private interest view of regulation. However, the benchmark reform appears to concur with the recent paradigm shift toward the public interest approach to banking regulation that involves more intrusive and detailed supervision with a focus on structural reforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":15105,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking Regulation","volume":"22 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the LIBOR scandal: the historical, the ethical, and the technological\",\"authors\":\"Xing Huan, Gary John Previts, Antonio Parbonetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41261-022-00205-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article examines the conception of banking regulation through the lens of the LIBOR scandal. The narrative of the scandal addresses the debate surrounding the public versus private view of banking regulation. Employing an analytical framework developed through reassembling prevailing regulation theories that is contextualized to the banking industry, we analyze the historical, ethical, and technological aspects of the LIBOR scandal and subsequent reform. We argue that the narrative of the LIBOR scandal represents a typical regulatory capture in the private interest view of regulation. However, the benchmark reform appears to concur with the recent paradigm shift toward the public interest approach to banking regulation that involves more intrusive and detailed supervision with a focus on structural reforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Banking Regulation\",\"volume\":\"22 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Banking Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00205-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Banking Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00205-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding the LIBOR scandal: the historical, the ethical, and the technological
This article examines the conception of banking regulation through the lens of the LIBOR scandal. The narrative of the scandal addresses the debate surrounding the public versus private view of banking regulation. Employing an analytical framework developed through reassembling prevailing regulation theories that is contextualized to the banking industry, we analyze the historical, ethical, and technological aspects of the LIBOR scandal and subsequent reform. We argue that the narrative of the LIBOR scandal represents a typical regulatory capture in the private interest view of regulation. However, the benchmark reform appears to concur with the recent paradigm shift toward the public interest approach to banking regulation that involves more intrusive and detailed supervision with a focus on structural reforms.
期刊介绍:
Under the guidance of its highly respected Editors and an eminent and truly international Editorial Board?Journal of Banking Regulation?has established itself as one of the leading sources of authoritative and detailed information on all aspects of law and regulation affecting banking institutions.Journal of Banking Regulation?publishes in each quarterly issue detailed briefings analyses and updates which are of direct relevance to practitioners working in the field while meeting the highest intellectual standards.Journal of Banking Regulation?publishes the latest thinking and best practice on:Basel I II and IIIModels for banking supervisionInternational accounting standardsDeposit protectionEnforcement decisions in banking regulation and supervisionCross-border competition in banking servicesCorporate governance in banksHarmonisation in banking marketsSupervising credit riskAnti-money laundering legislation and regulationsMonetary integrationRisk capital and capital adequacySystemic risk in banking operationsCross-border regulationCross-border bank insolvencyModels for banking riskEssential reading for:central bankersbanking supervisorsfinancial regulatorsbankerscompliance officersheads of risk managementpolicy makersbank associationslawyers specialising in banking lawaccountantsinternal and external bank auditorsacademics and researchers