预测K-12教师应用计算思维技能能力的因素

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Deepti Tagare
{"title":"预测K-12教师应用计算思维技能能力的因素","authors":"Deepti Tagare","doi":"10.1145/3633205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background and Objective</b>. Teacher assessment research suggests that teachers have good conceptual understanding of CT. However, to model CT based problem-solving in their classrooms, teachers need to develop the ability to recognize when and how to apply CT skills. Does existing professional development (PD) equip teachers to know when and how to apply CT skills? What factors should PD providers consider while developing trainings for CT application skills?</p><p><b>Method</b>. This retrospective observational study used a binomial regression model to determine what factors predict teachers’ probability of performing well on a CT application skills test.</p><p><b>Participants</b>. Participants of this study were 129 in-service K-12 teachers from a community of practice in India.</p><p><b>Findings</b>. Results show that teachers who have received at least one CT training, who have a higher teaching experience, and are currently teaching CT will have a higher probability of applying CT skills correctly to problems irrespective of the subject they teach and their educational backgrounds. However, receiving higher number of CT PD trainings was a negative predictor of teachers’ performance.</p><p><b>Implications</b>. Implications for school administrators, professional development providers, and researchers are discussed. Teachers need ample opportunity to teach CT in their teaching schedules. Continuous professional development does not necessarily result in improved CT application skills unless careful consideration is given to the pedagogies used and to the resolution of misconceptions that teachers may have developed in prior training. Mixing plugged and unplugged pedagogical approaches may be beneficial to encourage transfer of CT application skills across different types of problems. Lastly, there is a need to develop valid and reliable instruments that measure CT application skills of teachers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48764,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education","volume":"35 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors That Predict K-12 Teachers' Ability to Apply Computational Thinking Skills\",\"authors\":\"Deepti Tagare\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3633205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Background and Objective</b>. Teacher assessment research suggests that teachers have good conceptual understanding of CT. However, to model CT based problem-solving in their classrooms, teachers need to develop the ability to recognize when and how to apply CT skills. Does existing professional development (PD) equip teachers to know when and how to apply CT skills? What factors should PD providers consider while developing trainings for CT application skills?</p><p><b>Method</b>. This retrospective observational study used a binomial regression model to determine what factors predict teachers’ probability of performing well on a CT application skills test.</p><p><b>Participants</b>. Participants of this study were 129 in-service K-12 teachers from a community of practice in India.</p><p><b>Findings</b>. Results show that teachers who have received at least one CT training, who have a higher teaching experience, and are currently teaching CT will have a higher probability of applying CT skills correctly to problems irrespective of the subject they teach and their educational backgrounds. However, receiving higher number of CT PD trainings was a negative predictor of teachers’ performance.</p><p><b>Implications</b>. Implications for school administrators, professional development providers, and researchers are discussed. Teachers need ample opportunity to teach CT in their teaching schedules. Continuous professional development does not necessarily result in improved CT application skills unless careful consideration is given to the pedagogies used and to the resolution of misconceptions that teachers may have developed in prior training. Mixing plugged and unplugged pedagogical approaches may be beneficial to encourage transfer of CT application skills across different types of problems. Lastly, there is a need to develop valid and reliable instruments that measure CT application skills of teachers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Computing Education\",\"volume\":\"35 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Computing Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3633205\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3633205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的。教师评价研究表明,教师对CT有较好的概念性理解。然而,为了在课堂上模拟基于CT的问题解决,教师需要培养识别何时以及如何应用CT技能的能力。现有的专业发展(PD)是否使教师知道何时以及如何应用CT技能?PD提供者在开展CT应用技能培训时应考虑哪些因素?本回顾性观察研究使用二项回归模型来确定哪些因素可以预测教师在CT应用技能测试中表现良好的概率。本研究的参与者是来自印度某实践社区的129名在职K-12教师。结果表明,接受过至少一次CT培训的教师,具有较高的教学经验,目前正在教授CT的教师,无论他们所教的科目和教育背景如何,都更有可能正确地将CT技能应用于问题。然而,接受更多的CT PD培训对教师的绩效呈负向预测。对学校管理者、专业发展提供者和研究人员的启示进行了讨论。教师在教学计划中需要有充足的机会教授CT。持续的专业发展并不一定导致CT应用技能的提高,除非仔细考虑所使用的教学方法,并解决教师在先前培训中可能产生的误解。混合使用插入式和不插入式的教学方法可能有助于促进CT应用技能在不同类型问题中的转移。最后,需要开发有效可靠的工具来衡量教师的CT应用技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors That Predict K-12 Teachers' Ability to Apply Computational Thinking Skills

Background and Objective. Teacher assessment research suggests that teachers have good conceptual understanding of CT. However, to model CT based problem-solving in their classrooms, teachers need to develop the ability to recognize when and how to apply CT skills. Does existing professional development (PD) equip teachers to know when and how to apply CT skills? What factors should PD providers consider while developing trainings for CT application skills?

Method. This retrospective observational study used a binomial regression model to determine what factors predict teachers’ probability of performing well on a CT application skills test.

Participants. Participants of this study were 129 in-service K-12 teachers from a community of practice in India.

Findings. Results show that teachers who have received at least one CT training, who have a higher teaching experience, and are currently teaching CT will have a higher probability of applying CT skills correctly to problems irrespective of the subject they teach and their educational backgrounds. However, receiving higher number of CT PD trainings was a negative predictor of teachers’ performance.

Implications. Implications for school administrators, professional development providers, and researchers are discussed. Teachers need ample opportunity to teach CT in their teaching schedules. Continuous professional development does not necessarily result in improved CT application skills unless careful consideration is given to the pedagogies used and to the resolution of misconceptions that teachers may have developed in prior training. Mixing plugged and unplugged pedagogical approaches may be beneficial to encourage transfer of CT application skills across different types of problems. Lastly, there is a need to develop valid and reliable instruments that measure CT application skills of teachers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computing Education
ACM Transactions on Computing Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) (formerly named JERIC, Journal on Educational Resources in Computing) covers diverse aspects of computing education: traditional computer science, computer engineering, information technology, and informatics; emerging aspects of computing; and applications of computing to other disciplines. The common characteristics shared by these papers are a scholarly approach to teaching and learning, a broad appeal to educational practitioners, and a clear connection to student learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信