再商业市场的自学习代理

IF 7.9 3区 管理学 Q1 Computer Science
Jan Groeneveld, Judith Herrmann, Nikkel Mollenhauer, Leonard Dreeßen, Nick Bessin, Johann Schulze Tast, Alexander Kastius, Johannes Huegle, Rainer Schlosser
{"title":"再商业市场的自学习代理","authors":"Jan Groeneveld, Judith Herrmann, Nikkel Mollenhauer, Leonard Dreeßen, Nick Bessin, Johann Schulze Tast, Alexander Kastius, Johannes Huegle, Rainer Schlosser","doi":"10.1007/s12599-023-00841-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nowadays, customers as well as retailers look for increased sustainability. Recommerce markets – which offer the opportunity to trade-in and resell used products – are constantly growing and help to use resources more efficiently. To manage the additional prices for the trade-in and the resale of used product versions challenges retailers as substitution and cannibalization effects have to be taken into account. An unknown customer behavior as well as competition with other merchants regarding both sales and buying back resources further increases the problem’s complexity. Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms offer the potential to deal with such tasks. However, before being applied in practice, self-learning algorithms need to be tested synthetically to examine whether they and which work in different market scenarios. In the paper, the authors evaluate and compare different state-of-the-art RL algorithms within a recommerce market simulation framework. They find that RL agents outperform rule-based benchmark strategies in duopoly and oligopoly scenarios. Further, the authors investigate the competition between RL agents via self-play and study how performance results are affected if more or less information is observable (cf. state components). Using an ablation study, they test the influence of various model parameters and infer managerial insights. Finally, to be able to apply self-learning agents in practice, the authors show how to calibrate synthetic test environments from observable data to be used for effective pre-training.</p>","PeriodicalId":55296,"journal":{"name":"Business & Information Systems Engineering","volume":"29 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-learning Agents for Recommerce Markets\",\"authors\":\"Jan Groeneveld, Judith Herrmann, Nikkel Mollenhauer, Leonard Dreeßen, Nick Bessin, Johann Schulze Tast, Alexander Kastius, Johannes Huegle, Rainer Schlosser\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12599-023-00841-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Nowadays, customers as well as retailers look for increased sustainability. Recommerce markets – which offer the opportunity to trade-in and resell used products – are constantly growing and help to use resources more efficiently. To manage the additional prices for the trade-in and the resale of used product versions challenges retailers as substitution and cannibalization effects have to be taken into account. An unknown customer behavior as well as competition with other merchants regarding both sales and buying back resources further increases the problem’s complexity. Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms offer the potential to deal with such tasks. However, before being applied in practice, self-learning algorithms need to be tested synthetically to examine whether they and which work in different market scenarios. In the paper, the authors evaluate and compare different state-of-the-art RL algorithms within a recommerce market simulation framework. They find that RL agents outperform rule-based benchmark strategies in duopoly and oligopoly scenarios. Further, the authors investigate the competition between RL agents via self-play and study how performance results are affected if more or less information is observable (cf. state components). Using an ablation study, they test the influence of various model parameters and infer managerial insights. Finally, to be able to apply self-learning agents in practice, the authors show how to calibrate synthetic test environments from observable data to be used for effective pre-training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business & Information Systems Engineering\",\"volume\":\"29 34\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business & Information Systems Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00841-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business & Information Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00841-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,消费者和零售商都在寻求更高的可持续性。再商业市场——提供以旧换新和转售二手产品的机会——正在不断增长,并有助于更有效地利用资源。管理以旧换新和二手产品转售的额外价格对零售商来说是一项挑战,因为必须考虑到替代和同类相吞的影响。未知的客户行为以及与其他商家在销售和回购资源方面的竞争进一步增加了问题的复杂性。强化学习(RL)算法提供了处理此类任务的潜力。然而,在实际应用之前,需要对自学习算法进行综合测试,以检查它们是否适用于不同的市场场景,哪些算法适用于不同的市场场景。在本文中,作者在再商务市场仿真框架中评估和比较了不同的最先进的强化学习算法。他们发现,在双寡头垄断和寡头垄断的情况下,强化学习代理的表现优于基于规则的基准策略。此外,作者通过自我博弈研究了强化学习代理之间的竞争,并研究了如果观察到更多或更少的信息(参见状态成分),性能结果是如何受到影响的。通过消融研究,他们测试了各种模型参数的影响,并推断出管理见解。最后,为了能够在实践中应用自学习代理,作者展示了如何从可观察数据校准合成测试环境,以用于有效的预训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Self-learning Agents for Recommerce Markets

Self-learning Agents for Recommerce Markets

Nowadays, customers as well as retailers look for increased sustainability. Recommerce markets – which offer the opportunity to trade-in and resell used products – are constantly growing and help to use resources more efficiently. To manage the additional prices for the trade-in and the resale of used product versions challenges retailers as substitution and cannibalization effects have to be taken into account. An unknown customer behavior as well as competition with other merchants regarding both sales and buying back resources further increases the problem’s complexity. Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms offer the potential to deal with such tasks. However, before being applied in practice, self-learning algorithms need to be tested synthetically to examine whether they and which work in different market scenarios. In the paper, the authors evaluate and compare different state-of-the-art RL algorithms within a recommerce market simulation framework. They find that RL agents outperform rule-based benchmark strategies in duopoly and oligopoly scenarios. Further, the authors investigate the competition between RL agents via self-play and study how performance results are affected if more or less information is observable (cf. state components). Using an ablation study, they test the influence of various model parameters and infer managerial insights. Finally, to be able to apply self-learning agents in practice, the authors show how to calibrate synthetic test environments from observable data to be used for effective pre-training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Business & Information Systems Engineering
Business & Information Systems Engineering 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
44
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: BISE (Business & Information Systems Engineering) is an international scholarly journal that undergoes double-blind peer review. It publishes scientific research on the effective and efficient design and utilization of information systems by individuals, groups, enterprises, and society to enhance social welfare. Information systems are viewed as socio-technical systems involving tasks, people, and technology. Research in the journal addresses issues in the analysis, design, implementation, and management of information systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信