{"title":"土耳其版kos髌股疼痛和骨关节炎亚量表的可靠性和有效性。","authors":"Sevim Beyza Ölmez, Gökhan Maraş, Coşkun Ulucaköy, Selda Başar","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2288197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patellofemoral pain and patellofemoral osteoarthritis are highly prevalent knee disorders associated with pain and functional limitations. The subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis (KOOS-PF) was developed to evaluate patients with patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to translate the KOOS-PF into Turkish and assess its measurement properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Turkish version of the KOOS-PF was tested for reliability and validity in a convenience sample of 55 patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis. Reliability analyses were conducted through a retest 7-14 days later with a subgroup of 35 patients. The KOOS-PF was compared with Kujala's Anterior Pain Scale (AKPS) and the Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36) to assess construct validity. Additionally, responsiveness analyses were performed on 29 patients who were followed up with a home-based exercise program three months later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Turkish version of KOOS-PF has high test-retest reliability (ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = 0.96) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91). It has a very good correlation with the AKPS (<i>r</i> = 0.77) and the SF-36 physical component summary (<i>r</i> = 0.64) with no floor or ceiling effects. Responsiveness is confirmed by a good correlation with the global rating of change score (<i>r</i> = 0.51). The minimal clinically important change is 16.5 points, and the minimal important difference is 10.2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of the KOOS-PF is valid, reliable, and responsive for evaluating patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"2935-2942"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis subscale of the KOOS.\",\"authors\":\"Sevim Beyza Ölmez, Gökhan Maraş, Coşkun Ulucaköy, Selda Başar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2023.2288197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patellofemoral pain and patellofemoral osteoarthritis are highly prevalent knee disorders associated with pain and functional limitations. The subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis (KOOS-PF) was developed to evaluate patients with patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to translate the KOOS-PF into Turkish and assess its measurement properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Turkish version of the KOOS-PF was tested for reliability and validity in a convenience sample of 55 patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis. Reliability analyses were conducted through a retest 7-14 days later with a subgroup of 35 patients. The KOOS-PF was compared with Kujala's Anterior Pain Scale (AKPS) and the Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36) to assess construct validity. Additionally, responsiveness analyses were performed on 29 patients who were followed up with a home-based exercise program three months later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Turkish version of KOOS-PF has high test-retest reliability (ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = 0.96) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91). It has a very good correlation with the AKPS (<i>r</i> = 0.77) and the SF-36 physical component summary (<i>r</i> = 0.64) with no floor or ceiling effects. Responsiveness is confirmed by a good correlation with the global rating of change score (<i>r</i> = 0.51). The minimal clinically important change is 16.5 points, and the minimal important difference is 10.2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of the KOOS-PF is valid, reliable, and responsive for evaluating patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2935-2942\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2288197\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2288197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis subscale of the KOOS.
Background: Patellofemoral pain and patellofemoral osteoarthritis are highly prevalent knee disorders associated with pain and functional limitations. The subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis (KOOS-PF) was developed to evaluate patients with patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis.
Purpose: This study aims to translate the KOOS-PF into Turkish and assess its measurement properties.
Methods: The Turkish version of the KOOS-PF was tested for reliability and validity in a convenience sample of 55 patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis. Reliability analyses were conducted through a retest 7-14 days later with a subgroup of 35 patients. The KOOS-PF was compared with Kujala's Anterior Pain Scale (AKPS) and the Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36) to assess construct validity. Additionally, responsiveness analyses were performed on 29 patients who were followed up with a home-based exercise program three months later.
Results: The Turkish version of KOOS-PF has high test-retest reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.96) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91). It has a very good correlation with the AKPS (r = 0.77) and the SF-36 physical component summary (r = 0.64) with no floor or ceiling effects. Responsiveness is confirmed by a good correlation with the global rating of change score (r = 0.51). The minimal clinically important change is 16.5 points, and the minimal important difference is 10.2.
Conclusion: The Turkish version of the KOOS-PF is valid, reliable, and responsive for evaluating patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.