土耳其版kos髌股疼痛和骨关节炎亚量表的可靠性和有效性。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2023.2288197
Sevim Beyza Ölmez, Gökhan Maraş, Coşkun Ulucaköy, Selda Başar
{"title":"土耳其版kos髌股疼痛和骨关节炎亚量表的可靠性和有效性。","authors":"Sevim Beyza Ölmez, Gökhan Maraş, Coşkun Ulucaköy, Selda Başar","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2288197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patellofemoral pain and patellofemoral osteoarthritis are highly prevalent knee disorders associated with pain and functional limitations. The subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis (KOOS-PF) was developed to evaluate patients with patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to translate the KOOS-PF into Turkish and assess its measurement properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Turkish version of the KOOS-PF was tested for reliability and validity in a convenience sample of 55 patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis. Reliability analyses were conducted through a retest 7-14 days later with a subgroup of 35 patients. The KOOS-PF was compared with Kujala's Anterior Pain Scale (AKPS) and the Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36) to assess construct validity. Additionally, responsiveness analyses were performed on 29 patients who were followed up with a home-based exercise program three months later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Turkish version of KOOS-PF has high test-retest reliability (ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = 0.96) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91). It has a very good correlation with the AKPS (<i>r</i> = 0.77) and the SF-36 physical component summary (<i>r</i> = 0.64) with no floor or ceiling effects. Responsiveness is confirmed by a good correlation with the global rating of change score (<i>r</i> = 0.51). The minimal clinically important change is 16.5 points, and the minimal important difference is 10.2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of the KOOS-PF is valid, reliable, and responsive for evaluating patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"2935-2942"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis subscale of the KOOS.\",\"authors\":\"Sevim Beyza Ölmez, Gökhan Maraş, Coşkun Ulucaköy, Selda Başar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2023.2288197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patellofemoral pain and patellofemoral osteoarthritis are highly prevalent knee disorders associated with pain and functional limitations. The subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis (KOOS-PF) was developed to evaluate patients with patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to translate the KOOS-PF into Turkish and assess its measurement properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Turkish version of the KOOS-PF was tested for reliability and validity in a convenience sample of 55 patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis. Reliability analyses were conducted through a retest 7-14 days later with a subgroup of 35 patients. The KOOS-PF was compared with Kujala's Anterior Pain Scale (AKPS) and the Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36) to assess construct validity. Additionally, responsiveness analyses were performed on 29 patients who were followed up with a home-based exercise program three months later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Turkish version of KOOS-PF has high test-retest reliability (ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = 0.96) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91). It has a very good correlation with the AKPS (<i>r</i> = 0.77) and the SF-36 physical component summary (<i>r</i> = 0.64) with no floor or ceiling effects. Responsiveness is confirmed by a good correlation with the global rating of change score (<i>r</i> = 0.51). The minimal clinically important change is 16.5 points, and the minimal important difference is 10.2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of the KOOS-PF is valid, reliable, and responsive for evaluating patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2935-2942\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2288197\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2288197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:髌股疼痛和髌股骨关节炎是非常普遍的与疼痛和功能限制相关的膝关节疾病。制定髌骨疼痛和骨关节炎的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分亚量表(KOOS-PF)来评估髌骨疼痛和骨关节炎患者。目的:本研究旨在将KOOS-PF翻译成土耳其语并评估其测量特性。方法:在55例髌股疼痛和/或骨关节炎患者的方便样本中,对土耳其版KOOS-PF进行了信度和效度测试。通过7-14天后对35例患者的亚组进行重新测试进行可靠性分析。将KOOS-PF与Kujala's Anterior Pain Scale (AKPS)和Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36)进行比较,评估construct效度。此外,对29名患者进行了反应性分析,这些患者在三个月后接受了家庭锻炼计划的随访。结果:土耳其版KOOS-PF具有较高的重测信度(ICC2,1 = 0.96)和内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.91)。它与AKPS (r = 0.77)和SF-36物理成分汇总(r = 0.64)有很好的相关性,没有下限或上限效应。响应性与总体变化评分有良好的相关性(r = 0.51)。临床重要变化最小值为16.5分,重要差异最小值为10.2分。结论:土耳其版KOOS-PF在评估髌股疼痛和/或骨关节炎患者方面是有效、可靠和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis subscale of the KOOS.

Background: Patellofemoral pain and patellofemoral osteoarthritis are highly prevalent knee disorders associated with pain and functional limitations. The subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis (KOOS-PF) was developed to evaluate patients with patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis.

Purpose: This study aims to translate the KOOS-PF into Turkish and assess its measurement properties.

Methods: The Turkish version of the KOOS-PF was tested for reliability and validity in a convenience sample of 55 patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis. Reliability analyses were conducted through a retest 7-14 days later with a subgroup of 35 patients. The KOOS-PF was compared with Kujala's Anterior Pain Scale (AKPS) and the Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36) to assess construct validity. Additionally, responsiveness analyses were performed on 29 patients who were followed up with a home-based exercise program three months later.

Results: The Turkish version of KOOS-PF has high test-retest reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.96) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91). It has a very good correlation with the AKPS (r = 0.77) and the SF-36 physical component summary (r = 0.64) with no floor or ceiling effects. Responsiveness is confirmed by a good correlation with the global rating of change score (r = 0.51). The minimal clinically important change is 16.5 points, and the minimal important difference is 10.2.

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the KOOS-PF is valid, reliable, and responsive for evaluating patients with patellofemoral pain and/or osteoarthritis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信