关于欧洲央行资产购买的时变效应

IF 1.9 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Andrejs Zlobins
{"title":"关于欧洲央行资产购买的时变效应","authors":"Andrejs Zlobins","doi":"10.1007/s00181-023-02529-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper (re-)evaluates the effectiveness of central bank asset purchases in the euro area given their prominent role in the ECB’s response to the pandemic as well as the evidence from the US suggesting diminishing returns of this policy measure over time. We analyse their macroeconomic impact in the euro area using a time-varying parameter structural vector autoregression with stochastic volatility and perform identification via sign and zero restrictions of Arias et al. (Econometrica 86:658–720, 2018), their fusion with high-frequency information approach akin to Jarociński and Karadi (Am Econ Macroecon 12:1–43, 2020) and a novel method which merges high-frequency identification with narrative sign restrictions of Antonlin-Diaz and Rubio-Ramirez (Am Econ Rev 108:2802–2829, 2018). We find that the potency of the ECB’s asset purchases to lift inflation has indeed considerably declined over time with several factors contributing to a more muted response of prices to central bank asset purchases. Our results show that the reanchoring channel is no longer active while the counterproductive effects via the mechanism outlined in Boehl et al. (Working Paper No. 691, 2020), which we dub the capacity utilization channel, have emerged lately and are further complemented with disinflationary effects stemming from the cost channel. Also, the effects passed through more standard transmission channels of central bank asset purchases like portfolio rebalancing and signalling, while still significant, appear to be less persistent recently. Overall, our findings point to a diminishing return of the ECB’s asset purchases to stabilize inflation and its expectations in the euro area.</p>","PeriodicalId":11642,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Economics","volume":"1 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the time-varying effects of the ECB’s asset purchases\",\"authors\":\"Andrejs Zlobins\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00181-023-02529-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper (re-)evaluates the effectiveness of central bank asset purchases in the euro area given their prominent role in the ECB’s response to the pandemic as well as the evidence from the US suggesting diminishing returns of this policy measure over time. We analyse their macroeconomic impact in the euro area using a time-varying parameter structural vector autoregression with stochastic volatility and perform identification via sign and zero restrictions of Arias et al. (Econometrica 86:658–720, 2018), their fusion with high-frequency information approach akin to Jarociński and Karadi (Am Econ Macroecon 12:1–43, 2020) and a novel method which merges high-frequency identification with narrative sign restrictions of Antonlin-Diaz and Rubio-Ramirez (Am Econ Rev 108:2802–2829, 2018). We find that the potency of the ECB’s asset purchases to lift inflation has indeed considerably declined over time with several factors contributing to a more muted response of prices to central bank asset purchases. Our results show that the reanchoring channel is no longer active while the counterproductive effects via the mechanism outlined in Boehl et al. (Working Paper No. 691, 2020), which we dub the capacity utilization channel, have emerged lately and are further complemented with disinflationary effects stemming from the cost channel. Also, the effects passed through more standard transmission channels of central bank asset purchases like portfolio rebalancing and signalling, while still significant, appear to be less persistent recently. Overall, our findings point to a diminishing return of the ECB’s asset purchases to stabilize inflation and its expectations in the euro area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Empirical Economics\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Empirical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-023-02529-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-023-02529-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

鉴于央行资产购买在欧洲央行应对疫情中的突出作用,以及来自美国的证据表明,随着时间的推移,这一政策措施的回报会递减,本文(重新)评估了欧元区央行资产购买的有效性。我们使用随机波动的时变参数结构向量自回归分析了它们在欧元区的宏观经济影响,并通过Arias等人的符号和零限制进行识别(Econometrica 86:658-720, 2018),它们与类似于Jarociński和Karadi (Am Econ Macroecon 12:1-43)的高频信息方法的融合。Antonlin-Diaz和Rubio-Ramirez (Am Econ Rev 108:2802-2829, 2018)提出了一种将高频识别与叙事符号限制相结合的新方法。我们发现,随着时间的推移,欧洲央行资产购买提振通胀的效力确实大幅下降,有几个因素导致价格对央行资产购买的反应更为温和。我们的研究结果表明,再锚定渠道不再活跃,而通过Boehl等人(工作文件第691号,2020年)概述的机制产生的反生产效应,我们称之为产能利用渠道,最近出现了,并进一步补充了源于成本渠道的反通胀效应。此外,通过央行资产购买(如投资组合再平衡和发出信号)等更标准的传导渠道传递的影响,尽管仍然显著,但最近似乎不那么持久了。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,欧洲央行为稳定欧元区通胀和预期而购买资产的回报正在减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

On the time-varying effects of the ECB’s asset purchases

On the time-varying effects of the ECB’s asset purchases

This paper (re-)evaluates the effectiveness of central bank asset purchases in the euro area given their prominent role in the ECB’s response to the pandemic as well as the evidence from the US suggesting diminishing returns of this policy measure over time. We analyse their macroeconomic impact in the euro area using a time-varying parameter structural vector autoregression with stochastic volatility and perform identification via sign and zero restrictions of Arias et al. (Econometrica 86:658–720, 2018), their fusion with high-frequency information approach akin to Jarociński and Karadi (Am Econ Macroecon 12:1–43, 2020) and a novel method which merges high-frequency identification with narrative sign restrictions of Antonlin-Diaz and Rubio-Ramirez (Am Econ Rev 108:2802–2829, 2018). We find that the potency of the ECB’s asset purchases to lift inflation has indeed considerably declined over time with several factors contributing to a more muted response of prices to central bank asset purchases. Our results show that the reanchoring channel is no longer active while the counterproductive effects via the mechanism outlined in Boehl et al. (Working Paper No. 691, 2020), which we dub the capacity utilization channel, have emerged lately and are further complemented with disinflationary effects stemming from the cost channel. Also, the effects passed through more standard transmission channels of central bank asset purchases like portfolio rebalancing and signalling, while still significant, appear to be less persistent recently. Overall, our findings point to a diminishing return of the ECB’s asset purchases to stabilize inflation and its expectations in the euro area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Empirical Economics publishes high quality papers using econometric or statistical methods to fill the gap between economic theory and observed data. Papers explore such topics as estimation of established relationships between economic variables, testing of hypotheses derived from economic theory, treatment effect estimation, policy evaluation, simulation, forecasting, as well as econometric methods and measurement. Empirical Economics emphasizes the replicability of empirical results. Replication studies of important results in the literature - both positive and negative results - may be published as short papers in Empirical Economics. Authors of all accepted papers and replications are required to submit all data and codes prior to publication (for more details, see: Instructions for Authors).The journal follows a single blind review procedure. In order to ensure the high quality of the journal and an efficient editorial process, a substantial number of submissions that have very poor chances of receiving positive reviews are routinely rejected without sending the papers for review.Officially cited as: Empir Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信