Therese M. Gardiner , Sharon Latimer , Jayne Hewitt , Brigid M. Gillespie
{"title":"不只是外科医生:对手术同意过程的定性探索","authors":"Therese M. Gardiner , Sharon Latimer , Jayne Hewitt , Brigid M. Gillespie","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Obtaining consent for surgery is a legal requirement and a professional practice standard, but little is known about how nurses and other healthcare professionals (HCPs) engage with this process.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To describe operating room (OR) HCPs’ perceptions of consent processes for adult patients undergoing planned surgery at one health service.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative exploratory design and purposive maximum variation sampling relative to age, discipline, experience, and role, were used to ensure broad perspectives were gathered. Semi-structured interviews with 17 OR HCPs were conducted between April and May 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Thematic analysis identified three themes: the HCPs’ role in verifying consent goes beyond the World Health Organization’s Surgical Safety Checklist, effective communication is crucial for obtaining and verifying consent, and day-of-surgery delays and errors are multi-factorial.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Production pressures in surgery can compromise consent processes, undermine communication, and impact patient safety in the OR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>HCPs verify more items than the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist, suggesting the checklist may not go far enough when verifying consent in surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S132276962300094X/pdfft?md5=d651b8e7f02cd6e776c1b888f39ac5a1&pid=1-s2.0-S132276962300094X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not just for surgeons: A qualitative exploration of the surgical consent process\",\"authors\":\"Therese M. Gardiner , Sharon Latimer , Jayne Hewitt , Brigid M. Gillespie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Obtaining consent for surgery is a legal requirement and a professional practice standard, but little is known about how nurses and other healthcare professionals (HCPs) engage with this process.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To describe operating room (OR) HCPs’ perceptions of consent processes for adult patients undergoing planned surgery at one health service.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative exploratory design and purposive maximum variation sampling relative to age, discipline, experience, and role, were used to ensure broad perspectives were gathered. Semi-structured interviews with 17 OR HCPs were conducted between April and May 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Thematic analysis identified three themes: the HCPs’ role in verifying consent goes beyond the World Health Organization’s Surgical Safety Checklist, effective communication is crucial for obtaining and verifying consent, and day-of-surgery delays and errors are multi-factorial.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Production pressures in surgery can compromise consent processes, undermine communication, and impact patient safety in the OR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>HCPs verify more items than the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist, suggesting the checklist may not go far enough when verifying consent in surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collegian\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S132276962300094X/pdfft?md5=d651b8e7f02cd6e776c1b888f39ac5a1&pid=1-s2.0-S132276962300094X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collegian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S132276962300094X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S132276962300094X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Not just for surgeons: A qualitative exploration of the surgical consent process
Background
Obtaining consent for surgery is a legal requirement and a professional practice standard, but little is known about how nurses and other healthcare professionals (HCPs) engage with this process.
Aim
To describe operating room (OR) HCPs’ perceptions of consent processes for adult patients undergoing planned surgery at one health service.
Methods
A qualitative exploratory design and purposive maximum variation sampling relative to age, discipline, experience, and role, were used to ensure broad perspectives were gathered. Semi-structured interviews with 17 OR HCPs were conducted between April and May 2021.
Findings
Thematic analysis identified three themes: the HCPs’ role in verifying consent goes beyond the World Health Organization’s Surgical Safety Checklist, effective communication is crucial for obtaining and verifying consent, and day-of-surgery delays and errors are multi-factorial.
Discussion
Production pressures in surgery can compromise consent processes, undermine communication, and impact patient safety in the OR.
Conclusion
HCPs verify more items than the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist, suggesting the checklist may not go far enough when verifying consent in surgery.
期刊介绍:
Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN).
The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues.
Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor.
The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription.
ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.