锁相呼吸不会影响情节性视觉识别记忆,但会影响其相应的 ERPs。

Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1111/psyp.14493
Martin Schaefer, Caitlin Hrysanidis, Johan N Lundström, Artin Arshamian
{"title":"锁相呼吸不会影响情节性视觉识别记忆,但会影响其相应的 ERPs。","authors":"Martin Schaefer, Caitlin Hrysanidis, Johan N Lundström, Artin Arshamian","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies have indicated that breathing shapes the underlying oscillatory brain activity critical for episodic memory, potentially impacting memory performance. However, the literature has presented conflicting results, with some studies suggesting that nasal inhalation enhances visual memory performance, while others have failed to observe any significant effects. Furthermore, the specific influence of breathing route (nasal vs. mouth) and the precise phase of the respiratory cycle during which stimuli are presented have remained elusive. To address this, we employed a visual recognition memory (VRM) and electroencephalography paradigm in which stimuli presentation was phase-locked to either inhalation or exhalation onset, using a within-subject design where participants performed the memory task while engaging in separate sessions of nose and mouth breathing. We show that neither breathing route nor breathing phase has a significant impact on VRM performance as measured by d-prime, with the data supporting the null hypothesis. However, we did find an effect of breathing phase on response bias, with participants adopting a more conservative decision criterion during exhalation. Moreover, we found that breathing phase during memory encoding shaped the late parietal effect (LPE) amplitude, while the Frontal Negative Component (FN400) and LPE during recognition were less impacted. While our study demonstrates that breathing does not shape VRM performance, it shows that it influences brain activity, reinforcing the importance of further research to elucidate the extent of respiratory influence on perception, cognition, and behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":94182,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"e14493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase-locked breathing does not affect episodic visual recognition memory but does shape its corresponding ERPs.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Schaefer, Caitlin Hrysanidis, Johan N Lundström, Artin Arshamian\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyp.14493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent studies have indicated that breathing shapes the underlying oscillatory brain activity critical for episodic memory, potentially impacting memory performance. However, the literature has presented conflicting results, with some studies suggesting that nasal inhalation enhances visual memory performance, while others have failed to observe any significant effects. Furthermore, the specific influence of breathing route (nasal vs. mouth) and the precise phase of the respiratory cycle during which stimuli are presented have remained elusive. To address this, we employed a visual recognition memory (VRM) and electroencephalography paradigm in which stimuli presentation was phase-locked to either inhalation or exhalation onset, using a within-subject design where participants performed the memory task while engaging in separate sessions of nose and mouth breathing. We show that neither breathing route nor breathing phase has a significant impact on VRM performance as measured by d-prime, with the data supporting the null hypothesis. However, we did find an effect of breathing phase on response bias, with participants adopting a more conservative decision criterion during exhalation. Moreover, we found that breathing phase during memory encoding shaped the late parietal effect (LPE) amplitude, while the Frontal Negative Component (FN400) and LPE during recognition were less impacted. While our study demonstrates that breathing does not shape VRM performance, it shows that it influences brain activity, reinforcing the importance of further research to elucidate the extent of respiratory influence on perception, cognition, and behavior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14493\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的研究表明,呼吸会影响对情节记忆至关重要的潜在大脑振荡活动,从而对记忆表现产生潜在影响。然而,文献中的研究结果并不一致,一些研究表明鼻腔吸气可提高视觉记忆能力,而另一些研究则没有观察到任何显著的影响。此外,呼吸途径(鼻腔呼吸与口腔呼吸)的具体影响以及刺激呈现时呼吸周期的精确阶段仍然难以捉摸。为了解决这个问题,我们采用了视觉识别记忆(VRM)和脑电图范例,其中刺激物的呈现与吸气或呼气开始的阶段锁定,采用受试者内设计,让受试者在分别进行鼻呼吸和口呼吸的同时完成记忆任务。我们的研究表明,通过 d-prime 测量,呼吸路径和呼吸阶段对 VRM 表现都没有显著影响,数据支持零假设。不过,我们确实发现呼吸阶段对反应偏差有影响,参与者在呼气时会采用更保守的决策标准。此外,我们还发现记忆编码时的呼吸相位会影响顶叶晚期效应(LPE)的振幅,而识别时的额叶负成分(FN400)和顶叶晚期效应受到的影响较小。虽然我们的研究表明呼吸不会影响 VRM 的表现,但它表明呼吸会影响大脑活动,这就更加说明了进一步研究呼吸对感知、认知和行为的影响程度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phase-locked breathing does not affect episodic visual recognition memory but does shape its corresponding ERPs.

Recent studies have indicated that breathing shapes the underlying oscillatory brain activity critical for episodic memory, potentially impacting memory performance. However, the literature has presented conflicting results, with some studies suggesting that nasal inhalation enhances visual memory performance, while others have failed to observe any significant effects. Furthermore, the specific influence of breathing route (nasal vs. mouth) and the precise phase of the respiratory cycle during which stimuli are presented have remained elusive. To address this, we employed a visual recognition memory (VRM) and electroencephalography paradigm in which stimuli presentation was phase-locked to either inhalation or exhalation onset, using a within-subject design where participants performed the memory task while engaging in separate sessions of nose and mouth breathing. We show that neither breathing route nor breathing phase has a significant impact on VRM performance as measured by d-prime, with the data supporting the null hypothesis. However, we did find an effect of breathing phase on response bias, with participants adopting a more conservative decision criterion during exhalation. Moreover, we found that breathing phase during memory encoding shaped the late parietal effect (LPE) amplitude, while the Frontal Negative Component (FN400) and LPE during recognition were less impacted. While our study demonstrates that breathing does not shape VRM performance, it shows that it influences brain activity, reinforcing the importance of further research to elucidate the extent of respiratory influence on perception, cognition, and behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信