{"title":"急性 A 型主动脉夹层二期血管内修复策略的疗效","authors":"Fumio Yamana, Toru Kuratani, Keitaro Domae, Tomohiko Sakamoto, Masatoshi Hata, Yukitoshi Shirakawa, Takafumi Masai, Yoshiki Sawa","doi":"10.1177/15266028231214206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the usefulness of a hybrid treatment strategy for acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 39 partial arch replacements (PAR; 26 male/13 female, mean age=67.9 years) in 62 patients with AAAD operated at our hospital from January 2019 to January 2023. The technique included PAR with graft-designed landing length and translocated the brachiocephalic artery inflow site during the initial surgery to minimize the invasiveness of the surgery. Thereafter, second-stage thoracic endovascular aortic repair (second TEVAR) for distal aortic events in the chronic phase was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was 1 case of 30-day mortality (2.6%) and 2 cases of postprocedural cerebral infarction (5.1%). The cumulative survival rates were 97.4%/1 year and 97.4%/3 years. The cumulative freedom from aorta-related second-stage procedure for the distal aortic event after initial PAR, which was performed in 13 patients (33.3%), was 63.9%/1 year and 59.7%/3 years. All patients requiring re-intervention after initial PAR underwent a second TEVAR with a 100% success rate and no postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initial PAR for AAAD in anticipation of the second TEVAR is a valuable strategy for enabling minimally invasive additional treatment of aorta-related re-intervention for distal aortic events in the chronic phase.Clinical ImpactThis study provides detailed information on the hybrid aortic repair strategy of the initial open partial arch repair and second staged endovascular repair for the acute type A aortic dissection. Based on this study, distal aortic re-intervention after initial open partial arch repair was necessary only in about 30% of cases, and no cases of SCI were observed in the initial treatment or in the second-stage endovascular repair and no cases of distal SINE were observed after the second staged endovascular repair. Overall, the results suggest that limiting the initial open partial arch repair can achieve good perioperative and early outcomes of initial surgery, and that second staged endovascular re-intervention for distal aortic events can be performed reliably, safely, and with minimal invasiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1538-1546"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Second-Stage Endovascular Repair Strategy for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.\",\"authors\":\"Fumio Yamana, Toru Kuratani, Keitaro Domae, Tomohiko Sakamoto, Masatoshi Hata, Yukitoshi Shirakawa, Takafumi Masai, Yoshiki Sawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15266028231214206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the usefulness of a hybrid treatment strategy for acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 39 partial arch replacements (PAR; 26 male/13 female, mean age=67.9 years) in 62 patients with AAAD operated at our hospital from January 2019 to January 2023. The technique included PAR with graft-designed landing length and translocated the brachiocephalic artery inflow site during the initial surgery to minimize the invasiveness of the surgery. Thereafter, second-stage thoracic endovascular aortic repair (second TEVAR) for distal aortic events in the chronic phase was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was 1 case of 30-day mortality (2.6%) and 2 cases of postprocedural cerebral infarction (5.1%). The cumulative survival rates were 97.4%/1 year and 97.4%/3 years. The cumulative freedom from aorta-related second-stage procedure for the distal aortic event after initial PAR, which was performed in 13 patients (33.3%), was 63.9%/1 year and 59.7%/3 years. All patients requiring re-intervention after initial PAR underwent a second TEVAR with a 100% success rate and no postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initial PAR for AAAD in anticipation of the second TEVAR is a valuable strategy for enabling minimally invasive additional treatment of aorta-related re-intervention for distal aortic events in the chronic phase.Clinical ImpactThis study provides detailed information on the hybrid aortic repair strategy of the initial open partial arch repair and second staged endovascular repair for the acute type A aortic dissection. Based on this study, distal aortic re-intervention after initial open partial arch repair was necessary only in about 30% of cases, and no cases of SCI were observed in the initial treatment or in the second-stage endovascular repair and no cases of distal SINE were observed after the second staged endovascular repair. Overall, the results suggest that limiting the initial open partial arch repair can achieve good perioperative and early outcomes of initial surgery, and that second staged endovascular re-intervention for distal aortic events can be performed reliably, safely, and with minimal invasiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1538-1546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231214206\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231214206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估急性A型主动脉夹层(AAAD)混合治疗策略的有效性:我们回顾性评估了2019年1月至2023年1月在我院接受手术的62例AAAD患者中39例部分主动脉弓置换术(PAR;26例男性/13例女性,平均年龄=67.9岁)的结果。该技术包括移植设计着陆长度的 PAR,并在初次手术中将肱动脉流入部位转位,以尽量减少手术的侵入性。此后,针对慢性期的远端主动脉事件进行了第二阶段胸腔内主动脉修补术(第二次 TEVAR):结果:30天死亡率为1例(2.6%),术后脑梗死2例(5.1%)。1年和3年的累积存活率分别为97.4%和97.4%。13名患者(33.3%)在初次PAR术后进行了主动脉远端事件的第二阶段手术,其累计免于主动脉相关手术的比例为63.9%/1年和59.7%/3年。所有在初次PAR术后需要再次介入的患者均接受了第二次TEVAR术,成功率为100%,且无术后并发症:结论:为第二次 TEVAR 进行 AAAD 初始 PAR 是一种有价值的策略,可在慢性期对主动脉相关的远端主动脉事件再介入进行微创额外治疗:本研究提供了关于急性A型主动脉夹层的混合主动脉修复策略的详细信息,即首次开放部分拱形修复和第二次分阶段血管内修复。根据这项研究,只有约 30% 的病例在初次开放式部分拱形修复术后需要进行远端主动脉再介入,初次治疗和第二阶段血管内修复术后均未观察到 SCI 病例,第二阶段血管内修复术后也未观察到远端 SINE 病例。总之,研究结果表明,限制初次开放式部分拱形修复术可以取得良好的围手术期效果和初次手术的早期效果,而针对远端主动脉事件的第二阶段血管内再介入手术可以可靠、安全、微创地进行。
The Efficacy of Second-Stage Endovascular Repair Strategy for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.
Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of a hybrid treatment strategy for acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD).
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 39 partial arch replacements (PAR; 26 male/13 female, mean age=67.9 years) in 62 patients with AAAD operated at our hospital from January 2019 to January 2023. The technique included PAR with graft-designed landing length and translocated the brachiocephalic artery inflow site during the initial surgery to minimize the invasiveness of the surgery. Thereafter, second-stage thoracic endovascular aortic repair (second TEVAR) for distal aortic events in the chronic phase was performed.
Results: There was 1 case of 30-day mortality (2.6%) and 2 cases of postprocedural cerebral infarction (5.1%). The cumulative survival rates were 97.4%/1 year and 97.4%/3 years. The cumulative freedom from aorta-related second-stage procedure for the distal aortic event after initial PAR, which was performed in 13 patients (33.3%), was 63.9%/1 year and 59.7%/3 years. All patients requiring re-intervention after initial PAR underwent a second TEVAR with a 100% success rate and no postoperative complications.
Conclusion: Initial PAR for AAAD in anticipation of the second TEVAR is a valuable strategy for enabling minimally invasive additional treatment of aorta-related re-intervention for distal aortic events in the chronic phase.Clinical ImpactThis study provides detailed information on the hybrid aortic repair strategy of the initial open partial arch repair and second staged endovascular repair for the acute type A aortic dissection. Based on this study, distal aortic re-intervention after initial open partial arch repair was necessary only in about 30% of cases, and no cases of SCI were observed in the initial treatment or in the second-stage endovascular repair and no cases of distal SINE were observed after the second staged endovascular repair. Overall, the results suggest that limiting the initial open partial arch repair can achieve good perioperative and early outcomes of initial surgery, and that second staged endovascular re-intervention for distal aortic events can be performed reliably, safely, and with minimal invasiveness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.