垂直腹直肌肌皮瓣盆腔重建术的手术效果。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011233
Malke Asaad, David Mitchell, Cedar Slovacek, Abbas M Hassan, Aashish Rajesh, Jun Liu, Sahil Kapur, Donald Baumann, Charles E Butler
{"title":"垂直腹直肌肌皮瓣盆腔重建术的手术效果。","authors":"Malke Asaad, David Mitchell, Cedar Slovacek, Abbas M Hassan, Aashish Rajesh, Jun Liu, Sahil Kapur, Donald Baumann, Charles E Butler","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap has emerged as the workhorse flap for perineal and pelvic reconstruction. The authors aimed to evaluate outcomes of the VRAM flap over a 20-year period and the role of mesh abdominal wall reinforcement following VRAM flap-based reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent pelvic reconstruction with a VRAM flap between January of 2001 and March of 2021. Our primary outcome measure included recipient and donor surgical-site occurrences (SSOs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified a total of 546 patients (55% women) with a mean age of 58 years and mean body mass index of 27 kg/m 2 . Mesh was used at the time of VRAM reconstruction to reinforce the abdominal donor site in 36% of patients. Recipient SSOs occurred in 38% of patients, and donor SSOs occurred in 17% of patients. Hernia was identified in 9.9% of patients, and bulge developed in 6.4% of patients. The Cox proportional hazards regression model for hernia occurrence identified age, body mass index, tobacco use (hazard ratio, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.04), and use as an extended VRAM flap (hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.04 to 4.36). The use of mesh or component separation were not independent protective factors for hernia occurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pedicled VRAM flap is versatile and is our preferred flap for reconstruction of pelvic and perineal defects. The use of mesh/component separation to allow for fascial closure was not shown to reduce donor-site hernia occurrence.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1105-1114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Outcomes of Vertical Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Pelvic Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Malke Asaad, David Mitchell, Cedar Slovacek, Abbas M Hassan, Aashish Rajesh, Jun Liu, Sahil Kapur, Donald Baumann, Charles E Butler\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap has emerged as the workhorse flap for perineal and pelvic reconstruction. The authors aimed to evaluate outcomes of the VRAM flap over a 20-year period and the role of mesh abdominal wall reinforcement following VRAM flap-based reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent pelvic reconstruction with a VRAM flap between January of 2001 and March of 2021. Our primary outcome measure included recipient and donor surgical-site occurrences (SSOs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified a total of 546 patients (55% women) with a mean age of 58 years and mean body mass index of 27 kg/m 2 . Mesh was used at the time of VRAM reconstruction to reinforce the abdominal donor site in 36% of patients. Recipient SSOs occurred in 38% of patients, and donor SSOs occurred in 17% of patients. Hernia was identified in 9.9% of patients, and bulge developed in 6.4% of patients. The Cox proportional hazards regression model for hernia occurrence identified age, body mass index, tobacco use (hazard ratio, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.04), and use as an extended VRAM flap (hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.04 to 4.36). The use of mesh or component separation were not independent protective factors for hernia occurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pedicled VRAM flap is versatile and is our preferred flap for reconstruction of pelvic and perineal defects. The use of mesh/component separation to allow for fascial closure was not shown to reduce donor-site hernia occurrence.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1105-1114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011233\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:垂直腹直肌肌皮瓣(VRAM)已成为会阴和骨盆重建的主要皮瓣。我们的目的是评估 20 年来 VRAM 皮瓣的疗效,以及基于 VRAM 皮瓣重建后网状腹壁加固的作用:我们对 2001 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月间使用 VRAM 皮瓣进行盆腔重建的所有连续患者进行了回顾性研究。我们的主要结果指标包括受体和供体手术部位发生率(SSOs):我们共发现了 546 名患者(55% 为女性),平均年龄为 58 岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为 27 kg/m 2。36%的患者在进行 VRAM 重建时使用了网片来加固腹部供体部位。38%的患者发生受体部位SSO,17%的患者发生供体部位SSO。9.9%的患者出现疝气,6.4%的患者出现隆起。疝气发生率的 Cox 比例危险度回归模型确定了年龄、体重指数、吸烟(HR 2.03,95% CI [1.02-4.04])和使用扩展 VRAM(HR 2.13,95% CI [1.04-4.36])。使用网片或组件分离并不是疝发生的独立保护因素:结论:带蒂VRAM皮瓣用途广泛,是我们重建骨盆和会阴缺损的首选皮瓣。使用网片/组件分离以实现筋膜闭合并未显示能减少供体部位疝的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Outcomes of Vertical Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Pelvic Reconstruction.

Background: The vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap has emerged as the workhorse flap for perineal and pelvic reconstruction. The authors aimed to evaluate outcomes of the VRAM flap over a 20-year period and the role of mesh abdominal wall reinforcement following VRAM flap-based reconstruction.

Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent pelvic reconstruction with a VRAM flap between January of 2001 and March of 2021. Our primary outcome measure included recipient and donor surgical-site occurrences (SSOs).

Results: The authors identified a total of 546 patients (55% women) with a mean age of 58 years and mean body mass index of 27 kg/m 2 . Mesh was used at the time of VRAM reconstruction to reinforce the abdominal donor site in 36% of patients. Recipient SSOs occurred in 38% of patients, and donor SSOs occurred in 17% of patients. Hernia was identified in 9.9% of patients, and bulge developed in 6.4% of patients. The Cox proportional hazards regression model for hernia occurrence identified age, body mass index, tobacco use (hazard ratio, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.04), and use as an extended VRAM flap (hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.04 to 4.36). The use of mesh or component separation were not independent protective factors for hernia occurrence.

Conclusions: The pedicled VRAM flap is versatile and is our preferred flap for reconstruction of pelvic and perineal defects. The use of mesh/component separation to allow for fascial closure was not shown to reduce donor-site hernia occurrence.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信