从青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的光栅立体背部图像中对曲线严重程度进行深度学习预测。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1007/s00586-023-08052-1
Martina Minotti, Stefano Negrini, Andrea Cina, Fabio Galbusera, Fabio Zaina, Tito Bassani
{"title":"从青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的光栅立体背部图像中对曲线严重程度进行深度学习预测。","authors":"Martina Minotti, Stefano Negrini, Andrea Cina, Fabio Galbusera, Fabio Zaina, Tito Bassani","doi":"10.1007/s00586-023-08052-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiation-free systems based on dorsal surface topography can potentially represent an alternative to radiographic examination for early screening of scoliosis, based on the ability of recognizing the presence of deformity or classifying its severity. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a deep learning model based on convolutional neural networks in directly predicting the Cobb angle from rasterstereographic images of the back surface in subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two datasets, comprising a total of 900 individuals, were utilized for model training (720 samples) and testing (180). Rasterstereographic scans were performed using the Formetric4D device. The true Cobb angle was obtained from radiographic examination. The best model configuration was identified by comparing different network architectures and hyperparameters through cross-validation in the training set. The performance of the developed model in predicting the Cobb angle was assessed on the test set. The accuracy in classifying scoliosis severity (non-scoliotic, mild, and moderate category) based on Cobb angle was evaluated as well.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean absolute error in predicting the Cobb angle was 6.1° ± 5.0°. Moderate correlation (r = 0.68) and a root-mean-square error of 8° between the predicted and true values was reported. The overall accuracy in classifying scoliosis severity was 59%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite some improvement over previous approaches that relied on spine shape reconstruction, the performance of the present fully automatic application is below that of radiographic evaluation performed by human operators. The study confirms that rasterstereography cannot be considered a valid non-invasive alternative to radiographic examination for clinical purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"4164-4170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning prediction of curve severity from rasterstereographic back images in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.\",\"authors\":\"Martina Minotti, Stefano Negrini, Andrea Cina, Fabio Galbusera, Fabio Zaina, Tito Bassani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-023-08052-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiation-free systems based on dorsal surface topography can potentially represent an alternative to radiographic examination for early screening of scoliosis, based on the ability of recognizing the presence of deformity or classifying its severity. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a deep learning model based on convolutional neural networks in directly predicting the Cobb angle from rasterstereographic images of the back surface in subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two datasets, comprising a total of 900 individuals, were utilized for model training (720 samples) and testing (180). Rasterstereographic scans were performed using the Formetric4D device. The true Cobb angle was obtained from radiographic examination. The best model configuration was identified by comparing different network architectures and hyperparameters through cross-validation in the training set. The performance of the developed model in predicting the Cobb angle was assessed on the test set. The accuracy in classifying scoliosis severity (non-scoliotic, mild, and moderate category) based on Cobb angle was evaluated as well.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean absolute error in predicting the Cobb angle was 6.1° ± 5.0°. Moderate correlation (r = 0.68) and a root-mean-square error of 8° between the predicted and true values was reported. The overall accuracy in classifying scoliosis severity was 59%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite some improvement over previous approaches that relied on spine shape reconstruction, the performance of the present fully automatic application is below that of radiographic evaluation performed by human operators. The study confirms that rasterstereography cannot be considered a valid non-invasive alternative to radiographic examination for clinical purposes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4164-4170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08052-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08052-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基于背表面地形图的无辐射系统能够识别畸形的存在或对畸形的严重程度进行分类,因此有可能成为脊柱侧弯早期筛查的放射检查替代方法。本研究旨在评估基于卷积神经网络的深度学习模型从青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者背部表面的光栅立体图像直接预测 Cobb 角度的有效性:利用两个数据集(共 900 人)进行模型训练(720 个样本)和测试(180 个样本)。使用 Formetric4D 设备进行光栅立体扫描。真实的 Cobb 角是通过放射检查获得的。通过在训练集中进行交叉验证,比较不同的网络结构和超参数,确定了最佳模型配置。在测试集上对所开发模型预测 Cobb 角的性能进行了评估。此外,还评估了根据 Cobb 角度对脊柱侧凸严重程度(非侧凸、轻度和中度)进行分类的准确性:结果:预测 Cobb 角的平均绝对误差为 6.1° ± 5.0°。据报告,预测值与真实值之间存在中度相关性(r = 0.68),均方根误差为 8°。脊柱侧弯严重程度分类的总体准确率为 59%:结论:尽管与以前依赖脊柱形状重建的方法相比有了一些改进,但目前全自动应用的性能仍低于人工操作的放射评估。这项研究证实,在临床上,光栅立体摄影不能被视为射线检查的有效无创替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deep learning prediction of curve severity from rasterstereographic back images in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Deep learning prediction of curve severity from rasterstereographic back images in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Purpose: Radiation-free systems based on dorsal surface topography can potentially represent an alternative to radiographic examination for early screening of scoliosis, based on the ability of recognizing the presence of deformity or classifying its severity. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a deep learning model based on convolutional neural networks in directly predicting the Cobb angle from rasterstereographic images of the back surface in subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Methods: Two datasets, comprising a total of 900 individuals, were utilized for model training (720 samples) and testing (180). Rasterstereographic scans were performed using the Formetric4D device. The true Cobb angle was obtained from radiographic examination. The best model configuration was identified by comparing different network architectures and hyperparameters through cross-validation in the training set. The performance of the developed model in predicting the Cobb angle was assessed on the test set. The accuracy in classifying scoliosis severity (non-scoliotic, mild, and moderate category) based on Cobb angle was evaluated as well.

Results: The mean absolute error in predicting the Cobb angle was 6.1° ± 5.0°. Moderate correlation (r = 0.68) and a root-mean-square error of 8° between the predicted and true values was reported. The overall accuracy in classifying scoliosis severity was 59%.

Conclusion: Despite some improvement over previous approaches that relied on spine shape reconstruction, the performance of the present fully automatic application is below that of radiographic evaluation performed by human operators. The study confirms that rasterstereography cannot be considered a valid non-invasive alternative to radiographic examination for clinical purposes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信