低收入和中等收入国家新生儿呼吸支持的使用:一项基于登记的观察性研究。

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1159/000534777
Nora Switchenko, Vivek Shukla, Musaku Mwenechanya, Elwyn Chomba, Archana Patel, Patricia L Hibberd, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Lester Figueroa, Manolo Mazariegos, Nancy F Krebs, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Richard Derman, Fabian Esamai, Edward A Liechty, Sheri Bucher, Sarah Saleem, Robert L Goldenberg, Adrien Lokangaka, Antoinette Tshefu, Carl L Bose, Marion Koso-Thomas, Sylvia Tan, Tracy Nolen, Elizabeth M McClure, Waldemar A Carlo
{"title":"低收入和中等收入国家新生儿呼吸支持的使用:一项基于登记的观察性研究。","authors":"Nora Switchenko, Vivek Shukla, Musaku Mwenechanya, Elwyn Chomba, Archana Patel, Patricia L Hibberd, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Lester Figueroa, Manolo Mazariegos, Nancy F Krebs, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Richard Derman, Fabian Esamai, Edward A Liechty, Sheri Bucher, Sarah Saleem, Robert L Goldenberg, Adrien Lokangaka, Antoinette Tshefu, Carl L Bose, Marion Koso-Thomas, Sylvia Tan, Tracy Nolen, Elizabeth M McClure, Waldemar A Carlo","doi":"10.1159/000534777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Newborns with hypoxemia often require life-saving respiratory support. In low-resource settings, it is unknown if respiratory support is delivered more frequently to term infants or preterm infants. We hypothesized that in a registry-based birth cohort in 105 geographic areas in seven low- and middle-income countries, more term newborns received respiratory support than preterm newborns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a hypothesis-driven observational study based on prospectively collected data from the Maternal and Newborn Health Registry of the NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research. Eligible infants enrolled in the registry were live-born between 22 and 44 weeks gestation with a birth weight ≥400 g and born from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Frequency data were obtained to report the number of term and preterm infants who received treatment with oxygen only, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation. Test for trends over time were conducted using robust Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>177,728 (86.3%) infants included in this study were term, and 28,249 (13.7%) were preterm. A larger number of term infants (n = 5,108) received respiratory support compared to preterm infants (n = 3,287). Receipt of each mode of respiratory support was more frequent in term infants. The proportion of preterm infants who received respiratory support (11.6%) was higher than the proportion of term infants receiving respiratory support (2.9%, p &lt; 0.001). The rate of provision of respiratory support varied between sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Respiratory support was more frequently used in term infants expected to be at low risk for respiratory disorders compared to preterm infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"116-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neonatal Respiratory Support Utilization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Registry-Based Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nora Switchenko, Vivek Shukla, Musaku Mwenechanya, Elwyn Chomba, Archana Patel, Patricia L Hibberd, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Lester Figueroa, Manolo Mazariegos, Nancy F Krebs, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Richard Derman, Fabian Esamai, Edward A Liechty, Sheri Bucher, Sarah Saleem, Robert L Goldenberg, Adrien Lokangaka, Antoinette Tshefu, Carl L Bose, Marion Koso-Thomas, Sylvia Tan, Tracy Nolen, Elizabeth M McClure, Waldemar A Carlo\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000534777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Newborns with hypoxemia often require life-saving respiratory support. In low-resource settings, it is unknown if respiratory support is delivered more frequently to term infants or preterm infants. We hypothesized that in a registry-based birth cohort in 105 geographic areas in seven low- and middle-income countries, more term newborns received respiratory support than preterm newborns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a hypothesis-driven observational study based on prospectively collected data from the Maternal and Newborn Health Registry of the NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research. Eligible infants enrolled in the registry were live-born between 22 and 44 weeks gestation with a birth weight ≥400 g and born from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Frequency data were obtained to report the number of term and preterm infants who received treatment with oxygen only, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation. Test for trends over time were conducted using robust Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>177,728 (86.3%) infants included in this study were term, and 28,249 (13.7%) were preterm. A larger number of term infants (n = 5,108) received respiratory support compared to preterm infants (n = 3,287). Receipt of each mode of respiratory support was more frequent in term infants. The proportion of preterm infants who received respiratory support (11.6%) was higher than the proportion of term infants receiving respiratory support (2.9%, p &lt; 0.001). The rate of provision of respiratory support varied between sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Respiratory support was more frequently used in term infants expected to be at low risk for respiratory disorders compared to preterm infants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neonatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"116-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339912/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低氧血症新生儿通常需要救生呼吸支持。在低资源环境中,尚不清楚是对足月婴儿还是早产儿更频繁地给予呼吸支持。我们假设,在7个低收入和中等收入国家105个地理区域的基于登记的出生队列中,足月新生儿接受呼吸支持的人数多于早产儿。方法:这是一项假设驱动的观察性研究,基于NICHD全球妇幼健康研究网络的孕产妇和新生儿健康登记处前瞻性收集的数据。登记的符合条件的婴儿是在2015年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间出生的,妊娠22至44周,出生体重≥400 g的活产婴儿。获得频率数据以报告接受纯氧、CPAP或机械通气治疗的足月和早产儿的数量。使用稳健泊松回归对随时间变化的趋势进行检验。结果:177,728例足月婴儿(86.3%),28,249例早产儿(13.7%)。与早产儿(3287名)相比,接受呼吸支持的足月婴儿(5108名)较多。每一种呼吸支持模式的接受在足月婴儿中更为频繁。早产儿接受呼吸支持的比例(11.6%)高于足月儿接受呼吸支持的比例(2.9%,p <0.001)。提供呼吸支持的比率因地点而异。结论:与早产儿相比,预期呼吸系统疾病风险较低的足月婴儿更常使用呼吸支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neonatal Respiratory Support Utilization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Registry-Based Observational Study.

Background: Newborns with hypoxemia often require life-saving respiratory support. In low-resource settings, it is unknown if respiratory support is delivered more frequently to term infants or preterm infants. We hypothesized that in a registry-based birth cohort in 105 geographic areas in seven low- and middle-income countries, more term newborns received respiratory support than preterm newborns.

Methods: This is a hypothesis-driven observational study based on prospectively collected data from the Maternal and Newborn Health Registry of the NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research. Eligible infants enrolled in the registry were live-born between 22 and 44 weeks gestation with a birth weight ≥400 g and born from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Frequency data were obtained to report the number of term and preterm infants who received treatment with oxygen only, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation. Test for trends over time were conducted using robust Poisson regression.

Results: 177,728 (86.3%) infants included in this study were term, and 28,249 (13.7%) were preterm. A larger number of term infants (n = 5,108) received respiratory support compared to preterm infants (n = 3,287). Receipt of each mode of respiratory support was more frequent in term infants. The proportion of preterm infants who received respiratory support (11.6%) was higher than the proportion of term infants receiving respiratory support (2.9%, p < 0.001). The rate of provision of respiratory support varied between sites.

Conclusions: Respiratory support was more frequently used in term infants expected to be at low risk for respiratory disorders compared to preterm infants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信