在临床实践中对甲襞毛细血管镜标准的临床应用和解释达成共识:埃及微循环学会的一项倡议。

IF 1.1 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Archives of rheumatology Pub Date : 2022-12-01 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.9875
Yasser El Miedany, Sherif Ismail, Mary Wadie Fawzy, Ulf Müller-Ladner, Roberto Giacomelli, Vasiliki Liakouli, W Hermann, Nihal Fathy, Maha El Gaafary, Nermin A Fouad, Sally Saber, Mohammed Hassan Abu-Zaid
{"title":"在临床实践中对甲襞毛细血管镜标准的临床应用和解释达成共识:埃及微循环学会的一项倡议。","authors":"Yasser El Miedany, Sherif Ismail, Mary Wadie Fawzy, Ulf Müller-Ladner, Roberto Giacomelli, Vasiliki Liakouli, W Hermann, Nihal Fathy, Maha El Gaafary, Nermin A Fouad, Sally Saber, Mohammed Hassan Abu-Zaid","doi":"10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.9875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Based on the mainstream adoption of nailfold capillaroscopy as an investigative tool for rheumatologists, this work was carried out by a panel of experts in the field of capillaroscopy and microcirculation to issue a consensus view on capillaroscopic image acquisition and analysis standardization.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>After the key clinical questions were identified by the core team, a systematic review of the published research was carried out focusing on variable capillaroscopic techniques, definitions, and characteristics, including capillary density (number of capillaries), capillary morphology (shape of each capillary), capillary dimensions (width of apical, arterial, and venous limb of the capillary), and the presence of hemorrhages. The expert panel attained a consensus and developed recommendations for the standardization of capillaroscopy in clinical practice. These included recommendations for normality and abnormality and the different capillaroscopic patterns. It also involved recommendations for scoring systems, reliability, and reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A panel of 11 experts participated in the two rounds with a response rate of 100%. A total of nine recommendations were obtained. The agreement with the recommendations (a score of 7-9) ranged from 81.8 to 90.9%. A consensus (i.e., ≥75% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed) was reached on all the clinical standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work highlighted the main NFC indications, the technical equipment that should be used, how to carry out the procedure, standardization of the terminology of the parameters, and the interpretation of NFC findings. An evidence-based consensus incorporating the advice and experience of a diverse international expert panel was reached.</p>","PeriodicalId":93884,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a consensus on the clinical applications and interpretations of the nailfold capillaroscopy standards in clinical practice: An initiative by the Egyptian Society of Microcirculation.\",\"authors\":\"Yasser El Miedany, Sherif Ismail, Mary Wadie Fawzy, Ulf Müller-Ladner, Roberto Giacomelli, Vasiliki Liakouli, W Hermann, Nihal Fathy, Maha El Gaafary, Nermin A Fouad, Sally Saber, Mohammed Hassan Abu-Zaid\",\"doi\":\"10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.9875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Based on the mainstream adoption of nailfold capillaroscopy as an investigative tool for rheumatologists, this work was carried out by a panel of experts in the field of capillaroscopy and microcirculation to issue a consensus view on capillaroscopic image acquisition and analysis standardization.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>After the key clinical questions were identified by the core team, a systematic review of the published research was carried out focusing on variable capillaroscopic techniques, definitions, and characteristics, including capillary density (number of capillaries), capillary morphology (shape of each capillary), capillary dimensions (width of apical, arterial, and venous limb of the capillary), and the presence of hemorrhages. The expert panel attained a consensus and developed recommendations for the standardization of capillaroscopy in clinical practice. These included recommendations for normality and abnormality and the different capillaroscopic patterns. It also involved recommendations for scoring systems, reliability, and reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A panel of 11 experts participated in the two rounds with a response rate of 100%. A total of nine recommendations were obtained. The agreement with the recommendations (a score of 7-9) ranged from 81.8 to 90.9%. A consensus (i.e., ≥75% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed) was reached on all the clinical standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work highlighted the main NFC indications, the technical equipment that should be used, how to carry out the procedure, standardization of the terminology of the parameters, and the interpretation of NFC findings. An evidence-based consensus incorporating the advice and experience of a diverse international expert panel was reached.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689008/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.9875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.9875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基于甲襞毛细血管镜作为风湿病学家调查工具的主流采用,本工作由一组毛细血管镜和微循环领域的专家进行,就毛细血管镜图像采集和分析标准化发表共识意见。患者和方法:在核心团队确定关键临床问题后,对已发表的研究进行系统回顾,重点关注可变毛细管镜技术、定义和特征,包括毛细血管密度(毛细血管数量)、毛细血管形态(每条毛细血管的形状)、毛细血管尺寸(毛细血管的根尖、动脉和静脉分支的宽度)和出血的存在。专家小组达成了共识,并提出了在临床实践中标准化毛细管镜检查的建议。其中包括对正常和异常的建议以及不同的毛细血管镜模式。它还包括对评分系统、可靠性和报告的建议。结果:由11名专家组成的小组参与了两轮问卷调查,回复率为100%。共提出了九项建议。与建议的一致度(7-9分)从81.8%到90.9%不等。就所有临床标准达成共识(即,≥75%的应答者强烈同意或同意)。结论:本工作强调了NFC的主要适应症、应使用的技术设备、如何执行程序、参数术语的标准化以及NFC研究结果的解释。达成了一项基于证据的共识,其中纳入了不同国际专家小组的建议和经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a consensus on the clinical applications and interpretations of the nailfold capillaroscopy standards in clinical practice: An initiative by the Egyptian Society of Microcirculation.

Objectives: Based on the mainstream adoption of nailfold capillaroscopy as an investigative tool for rheumatologists, this work was carried out by a panel of experts in the field of capillaroscopy and microcirculation to issue a consensus view on capillaroscopic image acquisition and analysis standardization.

Patients and methods: After the key clinical questions were identified by the core team, a systematic review of the published research was carried out focusing on variable capillaroscopic techniques, definitions, and characteristics, including capillary density (number of capillaries), capillary morphology (shape of each capillary), capillary dimensions (width of apical, arterial, and venous limb of the capillary), and the presence of hemorrhages. The expert panel attained a consensus and developed recommendations for the standardization of capillaroscopy in clinical practice. These included recommendations for normality and abnormality and the different capillaroscopic patterns. It also involved recommendations for scoring systems, reliability, and reporting.

Results: A panel of 11 experts participated in the two rounds with a response rate of 100%. A total of nine recommendations were obtained. The agreement with the recommendations (a score of 7-9) ranged from 81.8 to 90.9%. A consensus (i.e., ≥75% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed) was reached on all the clinical standards.

Conclusion: This work highlighted the main NFC indications, the technical equipment that should be used, how to carry out the procedure, standardization of the terminology of the parameters, and the interpretation of NFC findings. An evidence-based consensus incorporating the advice and experience of a diverse international expert panel was reached.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信