痴呆是否与较长等待时间分配到新的初级保健提供者有关?新斯科舍省需要一个家庭实践登记处的分析来自小狗的研究。

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Miranda L McConnell, Emily Gard Marshall, David Stock, Shanna C Trenaman, Melissa K Andrew
{"title":"痴呆是否与较长等待时间分配到新的初级保健提供者有关?新斯科舍省需要一个家庭实践登记处的分析来自小狗的研究。","authors":"Miranda L McConnell, Emily Gard Marshall, David Stock, Shanna C Trenaman, Melissa K Andrew","doi":"10.5770/cgj.26.681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to Primary Care Providers (PCPs) is limited for many Canadians. \"Unattached patients\" are persons who do not have a PCP. Older adults living with dementia may face greater challenges seeking attachment. This study investigated whether older adults living with dementia experience differential wait times for PCPs compared to those without a diagnosis of dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational descriptive study of the centralized wait-list data from the Nova Scotia (NS) Need a Family Practice Registry (NaFPR). Time on provider wait-list by dementia diagnosis and age were compared. Number of days on the registry across these measures was estimated. Multivariable proportional hazards regression was used to compare hazards of remaining on the registry over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unattached older adults living with dementia were on the NaFPR for less time compared to those without dementia (381.4 vs. 428.8 days, respectively). After adjusting for age, self-reported gender, comorbidity, rurality, income quintiles, and overall deprivation, older adults with dementia had a 1.13-fold (95% CI: 1.04-1.24) increase in the likelihood of leaving the NaFPR. Potential contributors to this small difference could be placement in Long Term Care (LTC) and subsequent facility PCP attachment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysis of the NaFPR exhibited similarly time to PCP attachment despite a diagnosis of dementia. This represented an effective equality model of health care utilized in NS. Future studies should investigate whether an equity model with priority attachment for vulnerable patients would reduce hospitalization and LTC institutionalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"26 4","pages":"502-510"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Dementia Related to a Longer Wait Time to be Assigned a New Primary Care Provider? An Analysis of the Nova Scotia Need a Family Practice Registry Derived from the PUPPY-Study.\",\"authors\":\"Miranda L McConnell, Emily Gard Marshall, David Stock, Shanna C Trenaman, Melissa K Andrew\",\"doi\":\"10.5770/cgj.26.681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to Primary Care Providers (PCPs) is limited for many Canadians. \\\"Unattached patients\\\" are persons who do not have a PCP. Older adults living with dementia may face greater challenges seeking attachment. This study investigated whether older adults living with dementia experience differential wait times for PCPs compared to those without a diagnosis of dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational descriptive study of the centralized wait-list data from the Nova Scotia (NS) Need a Family Practice Registry (NaFPR). Time on provider wait-list by dementia diagnosis and age were compared. Number of days on the registry across these measures was estimated. Multivariable proportional hazards regression was used to compare hazards of remaining on the registry over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unattached older adults living with dementia were on the NaFPR for less time compared to those without dementia (381.4 vs. 428.8 days, respectively). After adjusting for age, self-reported gender, comorbidity, rurality, income quintiles, and overall deprivation, older adults with dementia had a 1.13-fold (95% CI: 1.04-1.24) increase in the likelihood of leaving the NaFPR. Potential contributors to this small difference could be placement in Long Term Care (LTC) and subsequent facility PCP attachment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysis of the NaFPR exhibited similarly time to PCP attachment despite a diagnosis of dementia. This represented an effective equality model of health care utilized in NS. Future studies should investigate whether an equity model with priority attachment for vulnerable patients would reduce hospitalization and LTC institutionalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Geriatrics Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"502-510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684307/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Geriatrics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.26.681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.26.681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对许多加拿大人来说,获得初级保健提供者(pcp)的机会有限。“独立患者”是指没有PCP的人。患有痴呆症的老年人在寻求依恋方面可能面临更大的挑战。这项研究调查了患有痴呆症的老年人与没有诊断为痴呆症的老年人相比,是否经历了不同的pcp等待时间。方法:这是一项来自新斯科舍省(NS)需要家庭实践登记处(NaFPR)的集中等候名单数据的观察性描述性研究。通过痴呆诊断和年龄比较提供者等待名单上的时间。估计了这些措施在登记处的天数。使用多变量比例风险回归来比较随时间留在注册表上的风险。结果:与没有痴呆的老年人相比,患有痴呆症的独居老年人使用NaFPR的时间更短(分别为381.4天和428.8天)。在调整了年龄、自我报告的性别、合并症、乡村性、收入五分位数和总体剥夺等因素后,老年痴呆患者离开NaFPR的可能性增加了1.13倍(95% CI: 1.04-1.24)。造成这种微小差异的潜在因素可能是长期护理(LTC)的安置和随后的设施PCP附属。结论:尽管诊断为痴呆,NaFPR分析显示出与PCP依恋相似的时间。这代表了国家保健服务中使用的一种有效的平等模式。未来的研究应探讨具有优先依恋的公平模型是否会减少弱势患者的住院和LTC机构化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Dementia Related to a Longer Wait Time to be Assigned a New Primary Care Provider? An Analysis of the Nova Scotia Need a Family Practice Registry Derived from the PUPPY-Study.

Background: Access to Primary Care Providers (PCPs) is limited for many Canadians. "Unattached patients" are persons who do not have a PCP. Older adults living with dementia may face greater challenges seeking attachment. This study investigated whether older adults living with dementia experience differential wait times for PCPs compared to those without a diagnosis of dementia.

Methods: This was an observational descriptive study of the centralized wait-list data from the Nova Scotia (NS) Need a Family Practice Registry (NaFPR). Time on provider wait-list by dementia diagnosis and age were compared. Number of days on the registry across these measures was estimated. Multivariable proportional hazards regression was used to compare hazards of remaining on the registry over time.

Results: Unattached older adults living with dementia were on the NaFPR for less time compared to those without dementia (381.4 vs. 428.8 days, respectively). After adjusting for age, self-reported gender, comorbidity, rurality, income quintiles, and overall deprivation, older adults with dementia had a 1.13-fold (95% CI: 1.04-1.24) increase in the likelihood of leaving the NaFPR. Potential contributors to this small difference could be placement in Long Term Care (LTC) and subsequent facility PCP attachment.

Conclusions: Analysis of the NaFPR exhibited similarly time to PCP attachment despite a diagnosis of dementia. This represented an effective equality model of health care utilized in NS. Future studies should investigate whether an equity model with priority attachment for vulnerable patients would reduce hospitalization and LTC institutionalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信