J. Deniel , D. Schnebelen , E. Reynaud , M.C. Ouimet , J. Navarro
{"title":"接管操作之前、期间和之后驾驶员的凝视行为:不同自动化解决方案相关的能动性的影响","authors":"J. Deniel , D. Schnebelen , E. Reynaud , M.C. Ouimet , J. Navarro","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2023.11.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the context of progressive automation of the driving activity, an alternation of automated driving phases and manual driving phases is becoming a reality. The problem of regaining manual control of the vehicle after a period of automated control (i.e., take-over) is critical, particularly concerning visual exploration during the transition phase. A driving simulator experiment was designed to investigate the impact of the level of agentivity manipulated by different levels of motor engagement on gaze parameters during the different temporal stages of a non-critical take-over situation (i.e., overtaking collision zone). The level of motor engagement decreased according to the increase in the level of automation; eye tracking data were collected, and gaze distribution over functional areas of interest was analysed across several periods of interest. Results revealed an influence of the degree of motor engagement on the gaze parameters linked to the integration and processing of visual information for a nominal driving period (i.e., automation activated) as well as during the take-over preparation period. During the period of effective resumption of manual control, most of the ocular parameters went back to their initial values, except for the higher motor disengagement modes (i.e., lowest levels of agentivity). These automation levels seem to show a residual influence of take-overs on manual driving, particularly in the ocular exploration of areas carrying the information useful for the fine regulation of the vehicle trajectory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"100 ","pages":"Pages 181-196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847823002620/pdfft?md5=686751e2d21942bafbedcda9e169d9a6&pid=1-s2.0-S1369847823002620-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driver’s gaze behaviour before, during and after take-over manoeuvres: Influence of agentivity associated with different automation solutions\",\"authors\":\"J. Deniel , D. Schnebelen , E. Reynaud , M.C. Ouimet , J. Navarro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2023.11.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the context of progressive automation of the driving activity, an alternation of automated driving phases and manual driving phases is becoming a reality. The problem of regaining manual control of the vehicle after a period of automated control (i.e., take-over) is critical, particularly concerning visual exploration during the transition phase. A driving simulator experiment was designed to investigate the impact of the level of agentivity manipulated by different levels of motor engagement on gaze parameters during the different temporal stages of a non-critical take-over situation (i.e., overtaking collision zone). The level of motor engagement decreased according to the increase in the level of automation; eye tracking data were collected, and gaze distribution over functional areas of interest was analysed across several periods of interest. Results revealed an influence of the degree of motor engagement on the gaze parameters linked to the integration and processing of visual information for a nominal driving period (i.e., automation activated) as well as during the take-over preparation period. During the period of effective resumption of manual control, most of the ocular parameters went back to their initial values, except for the higher motor disengagement modes (i.e., lowest levels of agentivity). These automation levels seem to show a residual influence of take-overs on manual driving, particularly in the ocular exploration of areas carrying the information useful for the fine regulation of the vehicle trajectory.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"100 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 181-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847823002620/pdfft?md5=686751e2d21942bafbedcda9e169d9a6&pid=1-s2.0-S1369847823002620-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847823002620\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847823002620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Driver’s gaze behaviour before, during and after take-over manoeuvres: Influence of agentivity associated with different automation solutions
In the context of progressive automation of the driving activity, an alternation of automated driving phases and manual driving phases is becoming a reality. The problem of regaining manual control of the vehicle after a period of automated control (i.e., take-over) is critical, particularly concerning visual exploration during the transition phase. A driving simulator experiment was designed to investigate the impact of the level of agentivity manipulated by different levels of motor engagement on gaze parameters during the different temporal stages of a non-critical take-over situation (i.e., overtaking collision zone). The level of motor engagement decreased according to the increase in the level of automation; eye tracking data were collected, and gaze distribution over functional areas of interest was analysed across several periods of interest. Results revealed an influence of the degree of motor engagement on the gaze parameters linked to the integration and processing of visual information for a nominal driving period (i.e., automation activated) as well as during the take-over preparation period. During the period of effective resumption of manual control, most of the ocular parameters went back to their initial values, except for the higher motor disengagement modes (i.e., lowest levels of agentivity). These automation levels seem to show a residual influence of take-overs on manual driving, particularly in the ocular exploration of areas carrying the information useful for the fine regulation of the vehicle trajectory.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.