急诊剖腹手术风险评估:南澳大利亚医院审计

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Joseph N. Hewitt , Thomas J. Milton , Octavia Tz-Shane Lee , Joshua Tinnion , Antonio Barbaro , Katarina Foley , Ishraq Murshed , Nick Georges , Rippan Shukla , Cameron Main , Christopher Dobbins , Markus I. Trochsler
{"title":"急诊剖腹手术风险评估:南澳大利亚医院审计","authors":"Joseph N. Hewitt ,&nbsp;Thomas J. Milton ,&nbsp;Octavia Tz-Shane Lee ,&nbsp;Joshua Tinnion ,&nbsp;Antonio Barbaro ,&nbsp;Katarina Foley ,&nbsp;Ishraq Murshed ,&nbsp;Nick Georges ,&nbsp;Rippan Shukla ,&nbsp;Cameron Main ,&nbsp;Christopher Dobbins ,&nbsp;Markus I. Trochsler","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emergency laparotomy (EL) is associated with high mortality rates and is performed on a heterogenous patient population. Pre-operative risk assessment is one tool which can assist with EL patient care. We aimed to characterise rates of pre-operative risk assessment for EL patients in South Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective audit of all patients undergoing EL over one year in six participating hospitals in South Australia was undertaken. Patient demographics, operation details, risk assessments (e.g. NELA, POSSUM, ACS-NSQIP) and outcomes were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>422 ELs were audited. Preoperative risk assessments were recorded for 42 (10 %) operations. The 30-day mortality rate was 9 %. There was no difference in mortality rates for patients with or without a risk assessment documented. Hospital participation in the Australia and New Zealand Emergency Laparotomy Audit (ANZELA) was associated with increased rates of risk assessment. Increasing patient age and then presence of certain comorbidities were also associated with increased rates of risk assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This audit shows poor uptake of recommendations for preoperative risk assessment in EL patients in South Australia. Comparable mortality rates to previously published Australian and international data are demonstrated. Factors associated with increased risk assessment rates are identified and are relevant to future quality improvement activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000712/pdfft?md5=ae629eeeb12d27d8542747ac0611d36c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262023000712-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency laparotomy risk assessment: An audit of South Australian hospitals\",\"authors\":\"Joseph N. Hewitt ,&nbsp;Thomas J. Milton ,&nbsp;Octavia Tz-Shane Lee ,&nbsp;Joshua Tinnion ,&nbsp;Antonio Barbaro ,&nbsp;Katarina Foley ,&nbsp;Ishraq Murshed ,&nbsp;Nick Georges ,&nbsp;Rippan Shukla ,&nbsp;Cameron Main ,&nbsp;Christopher Dobbins ,&nbsp;Markus I. Trochsler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emergency laparotomy (EL) is associated with high mortality rates and is performed on a heterogenous patient population. Pre-operative risk assessment is one tool which can assist with EL patient care. We aimed to characterise rates of pre-operative risk assessment for EL patients in South Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective audit of all patients undergoing EL over one year in six participating hospitals in South Australia was undertaken. Patient demographics, operation details, risk assessments (e.g. NELA, POSSUM, ACS-NSQIP) and outcomes were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>422 ELs were audited. Preoperative risk assessments were recorded for 42 (10 %) operations. The 30-day mortality rate was 9 %. There was no difference in mortality rates for patients with or without a risk assessment documented. Hospital participation in the Australia and New Zealand Emergency Laparotomy Audit (ANZELA) was associated with increased rates of risk assessment. Increasing patient age and then presence of certain comorbidities were also associated with increased rates of risk assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This audit shows poor uptake of recommendations for preoperative risk assessment in EL patients in South Australia. Comparable mortality rates to previously published Australian and international data are demonstrated. Factors associated with increased risk assessment rates are identified and are relevant to future quality improvement activities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000712/pdfft?md5=ae629eeeb12d27d8542747ac0611d36c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262023000712-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景急诊剖腹手术(EL)与高死亡率相关,并且在异质患者群体中进行。术前风险评估是辅助EL患者护理的一种工具。我们的目的是描述南澳大利亚州EL患者的术前风险评估率。方法回顾性分析南澳6家医院1年以上接受EL治疗的患者。记录患者人口统计、手术细节、风险评估(如NELA、POSSUM、ACS-NSQIP)和结果。结果共审核了422例el。42例(10%)手术记录术前风险评估。30天死亡率为9%。有或没有风险评估记录的患者的死亡率没有差异。医院参与澳大利亚和新西兰紧急剖腹手术审计(ANZELA)与风险评估率增加相关。患者年龄的增加和某些合并症的出现也与风险评估率的增加有关。结论:本次审计显示,南澳大利亚州EL患者术前风险评估建议采纳率较低。报告显示了与以前公布的澳大利亚和国际数据相当的死亡率。确定与风险评估率增加有关的因素,并与未来的质量改进活动有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency laparotomy risk assessment: An audit of South Australian hospitals

Background

Emergency laparotomy (EL) is associated with high mortality rates and is performed on a heterogenous patient population. Pre-operative risk assessment is one tool which can assist with EL patient care. We aimed to characterise rates of pre-operative risk assessment for EL patients in South Australia.

Methods

A retrospective audit of all patients undergoing EL over one year in six participating hospitals in South Australia was undertaken. Patient demographics, operation details, risk assessments (e.g. NELA, POSSUM, ACS-NSQIP) and outcomes were recorded.

Results

422 ELs were audited. Preoperative risk assessments were recorded for 42 (10 %) operations. The 30-day mortality rate was 9 %. There was no difference in mortality rates for patients with or without a risk assessment documented. Hospital participation in the Australia and New Zealand Emergency Laparotomy Audit (ANZELA) was associated with increased rates of risk assessment. Increasing patient age and then presence of certain comorbidities were also associated with increased rates of risk assessment.

Conclusions

This audit shows poor uptake of recommendations for preoperative risk assessment in EL patients in South Australia. Comparable mortality rates to previously published Australian and international data are demonstrated. Factors associated with increased risk assessment rates are identified and are relevant to future quality improvement activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信