从复杂性理论中选择正确的算法

IF 0.8 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Shouda Wang , Weijie Zheng , Benjamin Doerr
{"title":"从复杂性理论中选择正确的算法","authors":"Shouda Wang ,&nbsp;Weijie Zheng ,&nbsp;Benjamin Doerr","doi":"10.1016/j.ic.2023.105125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Choosing a suitable algorithm from the myriads of different search heuristics is difficult when faced with a novel optimization problem. In this work, we argue that the purely academic question of what could be the best possible algorithm in a certain broad class of black-box optimizers can give fruitful indications in which direction to search for good established heuristics. We demonstrate this approach on the recently proposed DLB benchmark. Our finding that the unary unbiased black-box complexity is only <span><math><mi>O</mi><mo>(</mo><msup><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>)</mo></math></span> suggests the Metropolis algorithm as an interesting candidate and we prove that it solves the DLB problem in quadratic time. We also prove that better runtimes cannot be obtained in the class of unary unbiased algorithms. We therefore shift our attention to algorithms that use the information of more parents to generate new solutions and find that the significance-based compact genetic algorithm can solve the DLB problem in time <span><math><mi>O</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>n</mi><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54985,"journal":{"name":"Information and Computation","volume":"296 ","pages":"Article 105125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890540123001281/pdfft?md5=8b4268eeef641099a096e9ad52fb7722&pid=1-s2.0-S0890540123001281-main.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choosing the right algorithm with hints from complexity theory\",\"authors\":\"Shouda Wang ,&nbsp;Weijie Zheng ,&nbsp;Benjamin Doerr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ic.2023.105125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Choosing a suitable algorithm from the myriads of different search heuristics is difficult when faced with a novel optimization problem. In this work, we argue that the purely academic question of what could be the best possible algorithm in a certain broad class of black-box optimizers can give fruitful indications in which direction to search for good established heuristics. We demonstrate this approach on the recently proposed DLB benchmark. Our finding that the unary unbiased black-box complexity is only <span><math><mi>O</mi><mo>(</mo><msup><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>)</mo></math></span> suggests the Metropolis algorithm as an interesting candidate and we prove that it solves the DLB problem in quadratic time. We also prove that better runtimes cannot be obtained in the class of unary unbiased algorithms. We therefore shift our attention to algorithms that use the information of more parents to generate new solutions and find that the significance-based compact genetic algorithm can solve the DLB problem in time <span><math><mi>O</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>n</mi><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Computation\",\"volume\":\"296 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890540123001281/pdfft?md5=8b4268eeef641099a096e9ad52fb7722&pid=1-s2.0-S0890540123001281-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890540123001281\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890540123001281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

当面临一个新的优化问题时,从无数不同的搜索启发式算法中选择一个合适的算法是困难的。在这项工作中,我们认为,在某种广泛的黑盒优化器类别中,什么可能是最好的算法这一纯粹的学术问题可以提供富有成效的指示,在哪个方向上搜索良好的已建立的启发式。我们在最近提出的DLB基准上演示了这种方法。我们发现一元无偏黑盒复杂度仅为O(n2),这表明Metropolis算法是一个有趣的候选算法,我们证明了它在二次时间内解决了DLB问题。我们也证明了在一元无偏算法中不能得到更好的运行时间。因此,我们将注意力转移到使用更多父母信息生成新解的算法上,并发现基于显著性的紧凑遗传算法可以在O(nlog ln n)时间内解决DLB问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choosing the right algorithm with hints from complexity theory

Choosing a suitable algorithm from the myriads of different search heuristics is difficult when faced with a novel optimization problem. In this work, we argue that the purely academic question of what could be the best possible algorithm in a certain broad class of black-box optimizers can give fruitful indications in which direction to search for good established heuristics. We demonstrate this approach on the recently proposed DLB benchmark. Our finding that the unary unbiased black-box complexity is only O(n2) suggests the Metropolis algorithm as an interesting candidate and we prove that it solves the DLB problem in quadratic time. We also prove that better runtimes cannot be obtained in the class of unary unbiased algorithms. We therefore shift our attention to algorithms that use the information of more parents to generate new solutions and find that the significance-based compact genetic algorithm can solve the DLB problem in time O(nlogn).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information and Computation
Information and Computation 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
审稿时长
140 days
期刊介绍: Information and Computation welcomes original papers in all areas of theoretical computer science and computational applications of information theory. Survey articles of exceptional quality will also be considered. Particularly welcome are papers contributing new results in active theoretical areas such as -Biological computation and computational biology- Computational complexity- Computer theorem-proving- Concurrency and distributed process theory- Cryptographic theory- Data base theory- Decision problems in logic- Design and analysis of algorithms- Discrete optimization and mathematical programming- Inductive inference and learning theory- Logic & constraint programming- Program verification & model checking- Probabilistic & Quantum computation- Semantics of programming languages- Symbolic computation, lambda calculus, and rewriting systems- Types and typechecking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信