两种氯硝西泮2mg片剂的生物等效性研究:一项随机、开放标签、交叉研究,在墨西哥健康志愿者禁食条件下进行。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-02 DOI:10.1007/s40120-023-00567-5
Luis Genis-Najera, Maria Elena Sañudo-Maury
{"title":"两种氯硝西泮2mg片剂的生物等效性研究:一项随机、开放标签、交叉研究,在墨西哥健康志愿者禁食条件下进行。","authors":"Luis Genis-Najera, Maria Elena Sañudo-Maury","doi":"10.1007/s40120-023-00567-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevalence of neurological disorders is high among the Mexican population. Clonazepam is primarily indicated to treat panic disorders, certain kinds of epilepsy such as status epilepticus, childhood motor seizures (petit mal absence, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and infantile spasms), anxiety, and muscle spasm. This study was performed to compare bioequivalence between two oral tablet formulations of clonazepam 2 mg in healthy Mexican volunteers under fasting conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase I, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, crossover study included 30 healthy volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to either test or reference formulation of clonazepam 2 mg. Each study period was separated by 21-day washout period. Blood samples were collected at pre-dose and up to 72 h after drug administration. Clonazepam concentrations were determined using a validated ultra-flow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using a non-compartmental method. Two formulations were considered bioequivalent if geometric mean ratios (test/reference) were between 80% and 125%. Safety was evaluated by recording adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable between test and reference formulations. The mean maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) was ≈ 13 ng/mL, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to last measurable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>) was ≈ 360 ng h/mL, time to reach maximum plasma concentration (T<sub>max</sub>) was ≈ 3 h, and elimination half-life (t<sub>1/2</sub>) was ≈ 43 h. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of C<sub>max</sub> (99.2-115.3%), AUC<sub>0-t</sub> (100.6-110.6%), and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> (98.5-111.6%) were within the bioequivalence range. Seven non-serious adverse events (mostly asymptomatic hypotension) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The test and reference formulations of clonazepam 2 mg were bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Mexican volunteers under fasting conditions.</p><p><strong>Protocol authorization number: </strong>213301410B0051 (Approved on April 13, 2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":19216,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10787705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioequivalence Study of Two Tablet Formulations of Clonazepam 2 mg: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study in Healthy Mexican Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Luis Genis-Najera, Maria Elena Sañudo-Maury\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40120-023-00567-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevalence of neurological disorders is high among the Mexican population. Clonazepam is primarily indicated to treat panic disorders, certain kinds of epilepsy such as status epilepticus, childhood motor seizures (petit mal absence, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and infantile spasms), anxiety, and muscle spasm. This study was performed to compare bioequivalence between two oral tablet formulations of clonazepam 2 mg in healthy Mexican volunteers under fasting conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase I, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, crossover study included 30 healthy volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to either test or reference formulation of clonazepam 2 mg. Each study period was separated by 21-day washout period. Blood samples were collected at pre-dose and up to 72 h after drug administration. Clonazepam concentrations were determined using a validated ultra-flow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using a non-compartmental method. Two formulations were considered bioequivalent if geometric mean ratios (test/reference) were between 80% and 125%. Safety was evaluated by recording adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable between test and reference formulations. The mean maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) was ≈ 13 ng/mL, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to last measurable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>) was ≈ 360 ng h/mL, time to reach maximum plasma concentration (T<sub>max</sub>) was ≈ 3 h, and elimination half-life (t<sub>1/2</sub>) was ≈ 43 h. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of C<sub>max</sub> (99.2-115.3%), AUC<sub>0-t</sub> (100.6-110.6%), and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> (98.5-111.6%) were within the bioequivalence range. Seven non-serious adverse events (mostly asymptomatic hypotension) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The test and reference formulations of clonazepam 2 mg were bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Mexican volunteers under fasting conditions.</p><p><strong>Protocol authorization number: </strong>213301410B0051 (Approved on April 13, 2021).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology and Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10787705/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00567-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00567-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:墨西哥人口中神经系统疾病的患病率很高。氯硝西泮主要用于治疗惊恐障碍、某些类型的癫痫,如癫痫持续状态、儿童运动癫痫发作(小症状缺失、lenox - gastaut综合征和婴儿痉挛)、焦虑和肌肉痉挛。本研究比较了两种口服氯硝西泮2毫克片剂在墨西哥健康志愿者空腹条件下的生物等效性。方法:该I期随机、开放标签、双治疗、交叉研究包括30名健康志愿者。受试者被随机分配到氯硝西泮2 mg的试验制剂或参比制剂。每个研究期都有21天的洗脱期。在给药前和给药后72小时采集血样。氯硝西泮的浓度采用超流液相色谱-串联质谱法测定。采用非室室法测定药代动力学参数。如果几何平均比率(试验/参比)在80%至125%之间,则认为两种制剂具有生物等效性。通过记录不良事件来评估安全性。结果:试验方与参比方的药动学参数具有可比性。平均最大血药浓度(Cmax)≈13 ng/mL,从时间0到最后可测浓度(AUC0-t)的血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0-t)≈360 ng h/mL,达到最大血药浓度(Tmax)的时间(Tmax)≈3 h,消除半衰期(t1/2)≈43 h。Cmax(99.2 ~ 115.3%)、AUC0-t(100.6 ~ 110.6%)和AUC0-∞(98.5 ~ 111.6%)的几何平均比值(90%置信区间)均在生物等效性范围内。记录了7个非严重不良事件(主要是无症状性低血压)。结论:氯硝西泮2 mg试验剂型与对照剂型具有生物等效性,在墨西哥健康志愿者空腹条件下耐受性良好。协议授权号:213301410B0051(2021年4月13日批准)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioequivalence Study of Two Tablet Formulations of Clonazepam 2 mg: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study in Healthy Mexican Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions.

Introduction: The prevalence of neurological disorders is high among the Mexican population. Clonazepam is primarily indicated to treat panic disorders, certain kinds of epilepsy such as status epilepticus, childhood motor seizures (petit mal absence, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and infantile spasms), anxiety, and muscle spasm. This study was performed to compare bioequivalence between two oral tablet formulations of clonazepam 2 mg in healthy Mexican volunteers under fasting conditions.

Methods: This phase I, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, crossover study included 30 healthy volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to either test or reference formulation of clonazepam 2 mg. Each study period was separated by 21-day washout period. Blood samples were collected at pre-dose and up to 72 h after drug administration. Clonazepam concentrations were determined using a validated ultra-flow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using a non-compartmental method. Two formulations were considered bioequivalent if geometric mean ratios (test/reference) were between 80% and 125%. Safety was evaluated by recording adverse events.

Results: Pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable between test and reference formulations. The mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was ≈ 13 ng/mL, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) was ≈ 360 ng h/mL, time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) was ≈ 3 h, and elimination half-life (t1/2) was ≈ 43 h. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of Cmax (99.2-115.3%), AUC0-t (100.6-110.6%), and AUC0-∞ (98.5-111.6%) were within the bioequivalence range. Seven non-serious adverse events (mostly asymptomatic hypotension) were recorded.

Conclusion: The test and reference formulations of clonazepam 2 mg were bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Mexican volunteers under fasting conditions.

Protocol authorization number: 213301410B0051 (Approved on April 13, 2021).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology and Therapy
Neurology and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope Neurology and Therapy aims to provide reliable and inclusive, rapid publication for all therapy related research for neurological indications, supporting the timely dissemination of research with a global reach, to help advance scientific discovery and support clinical practice. Neurology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of neurological and psychiatric therapies, (also covering surgery and devices). Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also welcomed. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial designs, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Neurology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research. Rapid Publication The journal’s rapid publication timelines aim for a peer review decision within 2 weeks of submission. If an article is accepted, it will be published online 3-4 weeks from acceptance. These rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who closely manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with rapid peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model, this allows for the rapid and efficient communication of the latest research and reviews to support scientific discovery and clinical practice. Open Access All articles published by Neurology and Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning that authors will always have a personal point of contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. We also encourage pre-submission enquiries and are always happy to provide a confidential assessment of manuscripts. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Neurology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case-by-case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviews conflict, an Editorial Board Member will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed. Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised, it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor, and authors are welcome to make rebuttals against individual reviewer comments, if appropriate. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors'' or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Please see here for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Neurology and Therapy is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact managing editor Lydia Alborn at lydia.alborn@springer.com.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信