完善临终关怀的政策与实践:医疗保险临终关怀福利的历史探索。

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging & Social Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1080/08959420.2023.2286164
Cara L Wallace, Stephanie P Wladkowski
{"title":"完善临终关怀的政策与实践:医疗保险临终关怀福利的历史探索。","authors":"Cara L Wallace, Stephanie P Wladkowski","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2023.2286164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hospice care in the US is heavily regulated to ensure access to the Medicare Hospice Benefit (MHB) for individuals with serious illness. Policy changes to the MHB, many of which intended to minimize potential fraud (e.g. focused medical reviews; documentation requirements for certifications, recertifications, and discharges; requirements of physician narratives and face-to-face visits), directly impact current hospice discharge practices and experiences. When patients revoke hospice or are unable to be recertified due to a stabilized condition, they lose access to the holistic philosophy of care and experience additional stressors with increased potential for burdensome transitions. Patients with chronic conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease or related dementias, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, or heart failure are more likely to have longer length of stays and are more often discharged alive from hospice. Few policy changes have been made to account for growing incidents of patients dying of chronic illness though the policy was originally created primarily for cancer patients, reflecting a time when most patients were dying of cancer. This manuscript describes the uniquely American phenomenon of a hospice live discharge, reviews relevant and historical policies, and provides recommendations for future research, policy, and practice to better support patients and families during this critical healthcare transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"996-1011"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Policy and Practices of Hospice Live Discharge: A Historical Exploration of the Medicare Hospice Benefit.\",\"authors\":\"Cara L Wallace, Stephanie P Wladkowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959420.2023.2286164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hospice care in the US is heavily regulated to ensure access to the Medicare Hospice Benefit (MHB) for individuals with serious illness. Policy changes to the MHB, many of which intended to minimize potential fraud (e.g. focused medical reviews; documentation requirements for certifications, recertifications, and discharges; requirements of physician narratives and face-to-face visits), directly impact current hospice discharge practices and experiences. When patients revoke hospice or are unable to be recertified due to a stabilized condition, they lose access to the holistic philosophy of care and experience additional stressors with increased potential for burdensome transitions. Patients with chronic conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease or related dementias, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, or heart failure are more likely to have longer length of stays and are more often discharged alive from hospice. Few policy changes have been made to account for growing incidents of patients dying of chronic illness though the policy was originally created primarily for cancer patients, reflecting a time when most patients were dying of cancer. This manuscript describes the uniquely American phenomenon of a hospice live discharge, reviews relevant and historical policies, and provides recommendations for future research, policy, and practice to better support patients and families during this critical healthcare transition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"996-1011\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143077/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2023.2286164\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2023.2286164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,临终关怀受到严格监管,以确保患有严重疾病的个人能够获得医疗保险临终关怀福利(MHB)。MHB的政策变化,其中许多旨在最大限度地减少潜在的欺诈行为(例如,重点医疗审查;认证、再认证和出院的文件要求;医生叙述和面对面访问的要求),直接影响目前的临终关怀出院实践和经验。当病人撤销安宁疗护或因病情稳定而无法重新认证时,他们失去了获得整体照护哲学的机会,并经历了额外的压力源,增加了负担转变的可能性。患有慢性疾病的患者,如阿尔茨海默病或相关痴呆,慢性阻塞性肺病或心力衰竭,更有可能有更长的住院时间,并且更经常从临终关怀出院。尽管该政策最初主要是为癌症患者制定的,反映了大多数患者死于癌症的时代,但几乎没有对日益增长的慢性疾病死亡事件做出政策改变。本文描述了美国独特的临终关怀现场出院现象,回顾了相关的历史政策,并为未来的研究、政策和实践提供建议,以更好地支持患者和家属在这一关键的医疗保健过渡期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Policy and Practices of Hospice Live Discharge: A Historical Exploration of the Medicare Hospice Benefit.

Hospice care in the US is heavily regulated to ensure access to the Medicare Hospice Benefit (MHB) for individuals with serious illness. Policy changes to the MHB, many of which intended to minimize potential fraud (e.g. focused medical reviews; documentation requirements for certifications, recertifications, and discharges; requirements of physician narratives and face-to-face visits), directly impact current hospice discharge practices and experiences. When patients revoke hospice or are unable to be recertified due to a stabilized condition, they lose access to the holistic philosophy of care and experience additional stressors with increased potential for burdensome transitions. Patients with chronic conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease or related dementias, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, or heart failure are more likely to have longer length of stays and are more often discharged alive from hospice. Few policy changes have been made to account for growing incidents of patients dying of chronic illness though the policy was originally created primarily for cancer patients, reflecting a time when most patients were dying of cancer. This manuscript describes the uniquely American phenomenon of a hospice live discharge, reviews relevant and historical policies, and provides recommendations for future research, policy, and practice to better support patients and families during this critical healthcare transition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信