David Nazarian, Viktoriia Olegovna Dzhuganova, Anastasia Nefedkina, Georgy Zakharov, Aleksander Fedosov, Grigoriy Kyalov, Arbak Khachatryan
{"title":"假体-外科联合入路及美观区软组织增强术的长期评价。","authors":"David Nazarian, Viktoriia Olegovna Dzhuganova, Anastasia Nefedkina, Georgy Zakharov, Aleksander Fedosov, Grigoriy Kyalov, Arbak Khachatryan","doi":"10.34172/joddd.2023.40593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no standard protocol for immediate implant placement and subsequent loading in the smile zone. We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of simultaneous implant placement, soft tissue grafting, and immediate prosthetic loading in the esthetic zone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five implants were placed in the maxillary aesthetic zone. Twenty-two patients were evaluated using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and White Esthetic Score (WES). Also, the degree of peri-implant bone resorption and patient survey were applied for the esthetic and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The esthetic and harmonizing outcomes were achieved according to the mean total PES/WES value (17.9±2.0). The mean overall PES was 8.5±1.66. The papilla level had the highest mean score (1.8±0.36). Furthermore, the combination of root convexity/color and soft tissue color and texture was one of the key values in evaluating the effectiveness of this method (the mean value was 1.5±0.5). The mesial and distal papillae were 1.6±0.5 and 1.8±0.4, respectively. None of the 35 implants reached below 6 points (which is considered an esthetically unsatisfactory result). The mean WES score was 9.5±0.57. The average degree of total peri-implant bone resorption was 1.05±0.3 mm after 12 months. According to the questionnaire, all the patients smiled without hesitation and were satisfied with the treatment (100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that restoring one or more teeth in the smile zone using the concept of one-stage implant placement, soft tissue flap augmentation, and loading with provisional crowns was an esthetically successful and predictable method.</p>","PeriodicalId":15599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","volume":"17 3","pages":"170-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term evaluation of combined prosthetic-surgical approach and soft tissue augmentation in the esthetic zone.\",\"authors\":\"David Nazarian, Viktoriia Olegovna Dzhuganova, Anastasia Nefedkina, Georgy Zakharov, Aleksander Fedosov, Grigoriy Kyalov, Arbak Khachatryan\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/joddd.2023.40593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no standard protocol for immediate implant placement and subsequent loading in the smile zone. We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of simultaneous implant placement, soft tissue grafting, and immediate prosthetic loading in the esthetic zone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five implants were placed in the maxillary aesthetic zone. Twenty-two patients were evaluated using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and White Esthetic Score (WES). Also, the degree of peri-implant bone resorption and patient survey were applied for the esthetic and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The esthetic and harmonizing outcomes were achieved according to the mean total PES/WES value (17.9±2.0). The mean overall PES was 8.5±1.66. The papilla level had the highest mean score (1.8±0.36). Furthermore, the combination of root convexity/color and soft tissue color and texture was one of the key values in evaluating the effectiveness of this method (the mean value was 1.5±0.5). The mesial and distal papillae were 1.6±0.5 and 1.8±0.4, respectively. None of the 35 implants reached below 6 points (which is considered an esthetically unsatisfactory result). The mean WES score was 9.5±0.57. The average degree of total peri-implant bone resorption was 1.05±0.3 mm after 12 months. According to the questionnaire, all the patients smiled without hesitation and were satisfied with the treatment (100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that restoring one or more teeth in the smile zone using the concept of one-stage implant placement, soft tissue flap augmentation, and loading with provisional crowns was an esthetically successful and predictable method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"170-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676532/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2023.40593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2023.40593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term evaluation of combined prosthetic-surgical approach and soft tissue augmentation in the esthetic zone.
Background: There is no standard protocol for immediate implant placement and subsequent loading in the smile zone. We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of simultaneous implant placement, soft tissue grafting, and immediate prosthetic loading in the esthetic zone.
Methods: Thirty-five implants were placed in the maxillary aesthetic zone. Twenty-two patients were evaluated using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and White Esthetic Score (WES). Also, the degree of peri-implant bone resorption and patient survey were applied for the esthetic and functional outcomes.
Results: The esthetic and harmonizing outcomes were achieved according to the mean total PES/WES value (17.9±2.0). The mean overall PES was 8.5±1.66. The papilla level had the highest mean score (1.8±0.36). Furthermore, the combination of root convexity/color and soft tissue color and texture was one of the key values in evaluating the effectiveness of this method (the mean value was 1.5±0.5). The mesial and distal papillae were 1.6±0.5 and 1.8±0.4, respectively. None of the 35 implants reached below 6 points (which is considered an esthetically unsatisfactory result). The mean WES score was 9.5±0.57. The average degree of total peri-implant bone resorption was 1.05±0.3 mm after 12 months. According to the questionnaire, all the patients smiled without hesitation and were satisfied with the treatment (100%).
Conclusion: This study showed that restoring one or more teeth in the smile zone using the concept of one-stage implant placement, soft tissue flap augmentation, and loading with provisional crowns was an esthetically successful and predictable method.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects (JODDD) is a Platinum* Open Access, peer-reviewed quarterly indexed journal that publishes articles of basic, clinical, and prospective nature in all areas of dentistry and oral health.