贝叶斯方法在基因-环境和基因-基因相互作用研究中的应用综述。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
N A Sun, Y U Wang, Jiadong Chu, Qiang Han, Yueping Shen
{"title":"贝叶斯方法在基因-环境和基因-基因相互作用研究中的应用综述。","authors":"N A Sun, Y U Wang, Jiadong Chu, Qiang Han, Yueping Shen","doi":"10.21873/cgp.20414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid advancements in high-throughput biological techniques have facilitated the generation of high-dimensional omics datasets, which have provided a solid foundation for precision medicine and prognosis prediction. Nonetheless, the problem of missing heritability persists. To solve this problem, it is essential to explain the genetic structure of disease incidence risk and prognosis by incorporating interactions. The development of the Bayesian theory has provided new approaches for developing models for interaction identification and estimation. Several Bayesian models have been developed to improve the accuracy of model and identify the main effect, gene-environment (G×E) and gene-gene (G×G) interactions. Studies based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are significant for the exploration of rare and common variants. Models based on the effect heredity principle and group-based models are relatively flexible and do not require strict constraints when dealing with the hierarchical structure between the main effect and interactions (M-I). These models have a good interpretability of biological mechanisms. Machine learning-based Bayesian approaches are highly competitive in improving prediction accuracy. These models provide insights into the mechanisms underlying the occurrence and progression of complex diseases, identify more reliable biomarkers, and develop higher predictive accuracy. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of these Bayesian approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":9516,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Genomics & Proteomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian Approaches in Exploring Gene-environment and Gene-gene Interactions: A Comprehensive Review.\",\"authors\":\"N A Sun, Y U Wang, Jiadong Chu, Qiang Han, Yueping Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/cgp.20414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rapid advancements in high-throughput biological techniques have facilitated the generation of high-dimensional omics datasets, which have provided a solid foundation for precision medicine and prognosis prediction. Nonetheless, the problem of missing heritability persists. To solve this problem, it is essential to explain the genetic structure of disease incidence risk and prognosis by incorporating interactions. The development of the Bayesian theory has provided new approaches for developing models for interaction identification and estimation. Several Bayesian models have been developed to improve the accuracy of model and identify the main effect, gene-environment (G×E) and gene-gene (G×G) interactions. Studies based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are significant for the exploration of rare and common variants. Models based on the effect heredity principle and group-based models are relatively flexible and do not require strict constraints when dealing with the hierarchical structure between the main effect and interactions (M-I). These models have a good interpretability of biological mechanisms. Machine learning-based Bayesian approaches are highly competitive in improving prediction accuracy. These models provide insights into the mechanisms underlying the occurrence and progression of complex diseases, identify more reliable biomarkers, and develop higher predictive accuracy. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of these Bayesian approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Genomics & Proteomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687732/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Genomics & Proteomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/cgp.20414\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Genomics & Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/cgp.20414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高通量生物技术的快速发展促进了高维组学数据集的生成,为精准医学和预后预测提供了坚实的基础。尽管如此,缺失遗传性的问题依然存在。为了解决这一问题,必须通过结合相互作用来解释疾病发病率、风险和预后的遗传结构。贝叶斯理论的发展为建立相互作用识别和估计模型提供了新的途径。为了提高模型的准确性,建立了几个贝叶斯模型,并确定了主效应、基因-环境(G×E)和基因-基因(G×G)的相互作用。基于单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)的研究对于探索罕见和常见变异具有重要意义。基于效应遗传原理的模型和基于群体的模型在处理主效应与交互作用(M-I)之间的层次结构时相对灵活,不需要严格的约束。这些模型具有良好的生物学机制解释性。基于机器学习的贝叶斯方法在提高预测精度方面具有很强的竞争力。这些模型提供了对复杂疾病发生和发展的机制的见解,确定了更可靠的生物标志物,并开发了更高的预测准确性。在本文中,我们提供了这些贝叶斯方法的全面回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bayesian Approaches in Exploring Gene-environment and Gene-gene Interactions: A Comprehensive Review.

Rapid advancements in high-throughput biological techniques have facilitated the generation of high-dimensional omics datasets, which have provided a solid foundation for precision medicine and prognosis prediction. Nonetheless, the problem of missing heritability persists. To solve this problem, it is essential to explain the genetic structure of disease incidence risk and prognosis by incorporating interactions. The development of the Bayesian theory has provided new approaches for developing models for interaction identification and estimation. Several Bayesian models have been developed to improve the accuracy of model and identify the main effect, gene-environment (G×E) and gene-gene (G×G) interactions. Studies based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are significant for the exploration of rare and common variants. Models based on the effect heredity principle and group-based models are relatively flexible and do not require strict constraints when dealing with the hierarchical structure between the main effect and interactions (M-I). These models have a good interpretability of biological mechanisms. Machine learning-based Bayesian approaches are highly competitive in improving prediction accuracy. These models provide insights into the mechanisms underlying the occurrence and progression of complex diseases, identify more reliable biomarkers, and develop higher predictive accuracy. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of these Bayesian approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics ONCOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Cancer Genomics & Proteomics (CGP) is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to publish rapidly high quality articles and reviews on the application of genomic and proteomic technology to basic, experimental and clinical cancer research. In this site you may find information concerning the editorial board, editorial policy, issue contents, subscriptions, submission of manuscripts and advertising. The first issue of CGP circulated in January 2004. Cancer Genomics & Proteomics is a journal of the International Institute of Anticancer Research. From January 2013 CGP is converted to an online-only open access journal. Cancer Genomics & Proteomics supports (a) the aims and the research projects of the INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ANTICANCER RESEARCH and (b) the organization of the INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES OF ANTICANCER RESEARCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信