设计以用户为中心的城市道路空间再分配策略

IF 12.5 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Manu Sasidharan , Mehran Eskandari Torbaghan , Yasmin Fathy , Christopher D.F. Rogers , Nicole Metje , Jennifer Schooling
{"title":"设计以用户为中心的城市道路空间再分配策略","authors":"Manu Sasidharan ,&nbsp;Mehran Eskandari Torbaghan ,&nbsp;Yasmin Fathy ,&nbsp;Christopher D.F. Rogers ,&nbsp;Nicole Metje ,&nbsp;Jennifer Schooling","doi":"10.1016/j.commtr.2023.100109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cities worldwide are geared to promote economic growth, improve accessibility, address environmental issues, and enhance the quality of life. However, the processes that lead to the design of urban roads, particularly the space distribution, reflect the inequalities existing in the fabric of our society. Motorists often have shorter travel time and more space than passengers of other modes. Furthermore, the existing transport appraisal and planning tools that frame sustainable transport policies fall short of considering the dimension of social justice. Therefore, our urban transport systems are essential areas for advancing sustainability through a transport justice-based approach to planning that can pivot the distribution of infrastructure investments over different social groups and transport modes. This study proposes such an approach by which such suitable urban transport strategies can be identified, co-created with users and appraised while considering the commuters’ needs. Specifically, the interaction between the multidimensional characteristics of sustainability and the principles of transport justice are investigated. The proposed approach is applied to London and Birmingham. The results show that a transparent and holistic approach to integrating users within transport planning is an effective way to reflect diverse needs and local circumstances and thereby ensure a just transition to sustainable urban transport policies. The results from the case studies highlight a strong rationale for the centrality of justice in any urban transport planning and policy making efforts, particularly in the allocation of road space.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100292,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Transportation Research","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100109"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424723000203/pdfft?md5=b58bac02ae47ff8721f08f0605348003&pid=1-s2.0-S2772424723000203-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing user-centric transport strategies for urban road space redistribution\",\"authors\":\"Manu Sasidharan ,&nbsp;Mehran Eskandari Torbaghan ,&nbsp;Yasmin Fathy ,&nbsp;Christopher D.F. Rogers ,&nbsp;Nicole Metje ,&nbsp;Jennifer Schooling\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.commtr.2023.100109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cities worldwide are geared to promote economic growth, improve accessibility, address environmental issues, and enhance the quality of life. However, the processes that lead to the design of urban roads, particularly the space distribution, reflect the inequalities existing in the fabric of our society. Motorists often have shorter travel time and more space than passengers of other modes. Furthermore, the existing transport appraisal and planning tools that frame sustainable transport policies fall short of considering the dimension of social justice. Therefore, our urban transport systems are essential areas for advancing sustainability through a transport justice-based approach to planning that can pivot the distribution of infrastructure investments over different social groups and transport modes. This study proposes such an approach by which such suitable urban transport strategies can be identified, co-created with users and appraised while considering the commuters’ needs. Specifically, the interaction between the multidimensional characteristics of sustainability and the principles of transport justice are investigated. The proposed approach is applied to London and Birmingham. The results show that a transparent and holistic approach to integrating users within transport planning is an effective way to reflect diverse needs and local circumstances and thereby ensure a just transition to sustainable urban transport policies. The results from the case studies highlight a strong rationale for the centrality of justice in any urban transport planning and policy making efforts, particularly in the allocation of road space.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications in Transportation Research\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424723000203/pdfft?md5=b58bac02ae47ff8721f08f0605348003&pid=1-s2.0-S2772424723000203-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications in Transportation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424723000203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Transportation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424723000203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界各地的城市都以促进经济增长、改善可达性、解决环境问题和提高生活质量为目标。然而,导致城市道路设计的过程,特别是空间分布,反映了我们社会结构中存在的不平等。驾车者通常比其他交通工具的乘客有更短的旅行时间和更多的空间。此外,制定可持续运输政策的现有运输评估和规划工具没有考虑到社会正义的层面。因此,我们的城市交通系统是促进可持续发展的重要领域,通过基于交通公正的规划方法,可以根据不同的社会群体和交通方式调整基础设施投资的分配。本研究提出了这样一种方法,通过这种方法,可以识别合适的城市交通策略,与用户共同创造,并在考虑通勤者需求的同时进行评估。具体而言,研究了可持续性的多维特征与运输公平原则之间的相互作用。所提出的方法适用于伦敦和伯明翰。结果表明,将用户纳入交通规划的透明和整体方法是反映不同需求和当地情况的有效方法,从而确保向可持续城市交通政策的公正过渡。案例研究的结果突出了在任何城市运输规划和政策制定工作中,特别是在道路空间分配方面,正义处于中心地位的有力理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing user-centric transport strategies for urban road space redistribution

Cities worldwide are geared to promote economic growth, improve accessibility, address environmental issues, and enhance the quality of life. However, the processes that lead to the design of urban roads, particularly the space distribution, reflect the inequalities existing in the fabric of our society. Motorists often have shorter travel time and more space than passengers of other modes. Furthermore, the existing transport appraisal and planning tools that frame sustainable transport policies fall short of considering the dimension of social justice. Therefore, our urban transport systems are essential areas for advancing sustainability through a transport justice-based approach to planning that can pivot the distribution of infrastructure investments over different social groups and transport modes. This study proposes such an approach by which such suitable urban transport strategies can be identified, co-created with users and appraised while considering the commuters’ needs. Specifically, the interaction between the multidimensional characteristics of sustainability and the principles of transport justice are investigated. The proposed approach is applied to London and Birmingham. The results show that a transparent and holistic approach to integrating users within transport planning is an effective way to reflect diverse needs and local circumstances and thereby ensure a just transition to sustainable urban transport policies. The results from the case studies highlight a strong rationale for the centrality of justice in any urban transport planning and policy making efforts, particularly in the allocation of road space.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信