《见证的文化:法律与约克戏剧》,作者:艾玛·利普顿

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Elisabeth Dutton
{"title":"《见证的文化:法律与约克戏剧》,作者:艾玛·利普顿","authors":"Elisabeth Dutton","doi":"10.1353/cdr.2023.a913248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Cultures of Witnessing: Law and the York Plays</em> by Emma Lipton <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Elisabeth Dutton (bio) </li> </ul> Emma Lipton. <em>Cultures of Witnessing: Law and the York Plays</em>. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2022. Pp. 248. $65. <p>Records of the York plays are preserved in the <em>York Memorandum Books</em>, manuscripts that also contain administrative records and charters defining and demonstrating York's politically powerful civic culture. These books offer some rationale for the approach that Emma Lipton follows in <em>Cultures of Witnessing</em>: the now firmly established interdisciplinary method that places the study of law alongside topics more generally explored in departments of language and literature. The York Plays are perhaps the most researched examples of medieval drama, but Lipton's approach does enable her to offer some new insights into their familiar material, particularly the Trial, Crucifixion and Last Judgment plays on which her discussion focuses.</p> <p>The book first describes the particular legal privileges granted to the city of York by successive English kings: the negotiation of these privileges provides \"crucial context for the depiction of legal witnessing in the York plays\" (6). Also outlined in the Introduction is the rise in the legal significance of witnesses as a result of the ban, imposed by the Fourth Lateran Council, on trial by ordeal: witnessing and jury trials, however, relied \"as much on rumor or shared knowledge as they did on direct perception\" (9), and many individuals were disqualified as witnesses on the basis of condition, gender, age, reputation, and fortune. Nonetheless, witnessing was an important civic duty, contributing to local, legal identity within the city. Witness records are also here described as similar to records of performance, with their accounts of places, times and persons resembling \"the unities of action, place and time long associated with the drama\" (17). Of course, these unities were no concern of medieval drama itself, but they may suggest associations in the mind of the modern scholar of drama.</p> <p>Subsequent chapters use medieval witnessing to theorize dramatic space, speech acts, affect, and temporality. Dramatic space is discussed in chapter 1 in relation to the York play of Christ's Entry into Jerusalem: unsurprisingly, comparison is drawn with the royal entry of King Henry IV into the city, but new light is cast on the comparison by Lipton's discussion of those present at the entry as if they were legal witnesses, \"neighbors close enough to have seen and heard relevant events, or to have local knowledge of reputation accorded by spatial proximity\" (24-5). The idea of the witness as neighbor then contributes to observations about the different stations around York at which each play was performed in turn: very localized spaces of individual performance were defined temporally by what small groups of witnesses could individually and collectively see and hear, \"just as in legal witnessing the neighborhood came into being in the actions of seeing, hearing, and sharing knowledge\" (44). <strong>[End Page 278]</strong></p> <p>The trial plays are the focus of chapter 2, which analyzes the speeches of Christ and the Beadle as models of witness testimony and good citizenship. Christ's reluctance to speak also reflects the ideal behavior prescribed in contemporary conduct books, this chapter argues. By contrast, the excessive speeches of Pilate and Herod identify them as tyrants according to the portraits of tyranny found in mirrors for princes. This is not new, but Lipton argues that her focus on witnessing offers fresh insight into the role of the body in speech, by contrast with scholars' concentration on Christ's body as symbol of the Christian community; furthermore, she argues that attention to a witness's intention and emotion, as emphasized by medieval legal theory, offers an understanding of affect in the plays as a public practice, different from the imaginative affective piety the plays are often thought to engage. Chapter 3 also discusses the trial plays, this time exploring witnessing as an activity poised between individual and social. The motives of Annas and Caiaphas are not presented as envious, as they are in the source texts, but rather are articulated in legal terms.</p> <p>Chapter 4 discusses the York Doomsday pageant in the light of the asynchronous model of temporality implied by witness. Although...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":39600,"journal":{"name":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","volume":"90 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultures of Witnessing: Law and the York Plays by Emma Lipton (review)\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Dutton\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cdr.2023.a913248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Cultures of Witnessing: Law and the York Plays</em> by Emma Lipton <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Elisabeth Dutton (bio) </li> </ul> Emma Lipton. <em>Cultures of Witnessing: Law and the York Plays</em>. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2022. Pp. 248. $65. <p>Records of the York plays are preserved in the <em>York Memorandum Books</em>, manuscripts that also contain administrative records and charters defining and demonstrating York's politically powerful civic culture. These books offer some rationale for the approach that Emma Lipton follows in <em>Cultures of Witnessing</em>: the now firmly established interdisciplinary method that places the study of law alongside topics more generally explored in departments of language and literature. The York Plays are perhaps the most researched examples of medieval drama, but Lipton's approach does enable her to offer some new insights into their familiar material, particularly the Trial, Crucifixion and Last Judgment plays on which her discussion focuses.</p> <p>The book first describes the particular legal privileges granted to the city of York by successive English kings: the negotiation of these privileges provides \\\"crucial context for the depiction of legal witnessing in the York plays\\\" (6). Also outlined in the Introduction is the rise in the legal significance of witnesses as a result of the ban, imposed by the Fourth Lateran Council, on trial by ordeal: witnessing and jury trials, however, relied \\\"as much on rumor or shared knowledge as they did on direct perception\\\" (9), and many individuals were disqualified as witnesses on the basis of condition, gender, age, reputation, and fortune. Nonetheless, witnessing was an important civic duty, contributing to local, legal identity within the city. Witness records are also here described as similar to records of performance, with their accounts of places, times and persons resembling \\\"the unities of action, place and time long associated with the drama\\\" (17). Of course, these unities were no concern of medieval drama itself, but they may suggest associations in the mind of the modern scholar of drama.</p> <p>Subsequent chapters use medieval witnessing to theorize dramatic space, speech acts, affect, and temporality. Dramatic space is discussed in chapter 1 in relation to the York play of Christ's Entry into Jerusalem: unsurprisingly, comparison is drawn with the royal entry of King Henry IV into the city, but new light is cast on the comparison by Lipton's discussion of those present at the entry as if they were legal witnesses, \\\"neighbors close enough to have seen and heard relevant events, or to have local knowledge of reputation accorded by spatial proximity\\\" (24-5). The idea of the witness as neighbor then contributes to observations about the different stations around York at which each play was performed in turn: very localized spaces of individual performance were defined temporally by what small groups of witnesses could individually and collectively see and hear, \\\"just as in legal witnessing the neighborhood came into being in the actions of seeing, hearing, and sharing knowledge\\\" (44). <strong>[End Page 278]</strong></p> <p>The trial plays are the focus of chapter 2, which analyzes the speeches of Christ and the Beadle as models of witness testimony and good citizenship. Christ's reluctance to speak also reflects the ideal behavior prescribed in contemporary conduct books, this chapter argues. By contrast, the excessive speeches of Pilate and Herod identify them as tyrants according to the portraits of tyranny found in mirrors for princes. This is not new, but Lipton argues that her focus on witnessing offers fresh insight into the role of the body in speech, by contrast with scholars' concentration on Christ's body as symbol of the Christian community; furthermore, she argues that attention to a witness's intention and emotion, as emphasized by medieval legal theory, offers an understanding of affect in the plays as a public practice, different from the imaginative affective piety the plays are often thought to engage. Chapter 3 also discusses the trial plays, this time exploring witnessing as an activity poised between individual and social. The motives of Annas and Caiaphas are not presented as envious, as they are in the source texts, but rather are articulated in legal terms.</p> <p>Chapter 4 discusses the York Doomsday pageant in the light of the asynchronous model of temporality implied by witness. Although...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMPARATIVE DRAMA\",\"volume\":\"90 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMPARATIVE DRAMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2023.a913248\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2023.a913248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

代替摘要,这里是内容的简短摘录:回顾:见证的文化:法律和约克戏剧由艾玛·利普顿伊丽莎白·达顿(传记)艾玛·利普顿。见证文化:法律与约克戏剧。费城:宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2022。248页。65美元。约克戏剧的记录保存在约克备忘录中,手稿中还包含行政记录和章程,定义和展示了约克政治上强大的公民文化。这些书为艾玛·利普顿在《见证的文化》中所采用的方法提供了一些基本原理:现在已经确立的跨学科方法,将法律研究与语言和文学部门更普遍探索的主题放在一起。约克戏剧可能是中世纪戏剧研究最多的例子,但利普顿的方法确实使她能够对他们熟悉的材料提供一些新的见解,特别是她的讨论重点关注的审判,钉十字架和最后审判戏剧。这本书首先描述了历任英国国王授予约克市的特殊法律特权:这些特权的谈判为“约克戏剧中法律见证的描述提供了至关重要的背景”(6)。引言中还概述了证人的法律意义的上升,这是第四次拉特兰会议对酷刑审判的禁令的结果:然而,证人和陪审团审判“依赖于谣言或共享的知识,就像他们依赖于直接感知一样”(9),许多人因为条件、性别、年龄、声誉和财富而被取消了证人资格。尽管如此,见证是一项重要的公民义务,有助于在城市中建立当地的法律身份。证人记录在这里也被描述为类似于表演记录,它们对地点、时间和人物的描述类似于“与戏剧长期相关的行动、地点和时间的统一”(17)。当然,这些统一与中世纪戏剧本身无关,但在现代戏剧学者的心目中,它们可能暗示着联系。随后的章节使用中世纪的见证来理论化戏剧空间、言语行为、情感和时间性。第一章讨论了戏剧空间与约克戏剧《基督进入耶路撒冷》的关系:毫不奇怪,将其与亨利四世国王进入耶路撒冷进行比较,但利普顿讨论了进入时在场的人,仿佛他们是法律证人,“邻居足够近,可以看到和听到相关事件,或者知道当地的声誉”(24-5)。证人作为邻居的想法有助于观察约克周围不同的车站,每个戏剧轮流上演:个人表演的非常局部的空间是由小群证人可以单独或集体地看到和听到的时间定义的,“就像在法律见证中,邻居在看到,听到和分享知识的行为中形成”(44)。审判剧是第二章的重点,这一章分析了基督和执事作为证人证词和良好公民典范的演讲。本章认为,基督不愿说话也反映了当代行为书籍中规定的理想行为。相比之下,彼拉多和希律的过度讲话,根据在王子的镜子中发现的暴政肖像,将他们确定为暴君。这并不新鲜,但利普顿认为,她对见证的关注为身体在言语中的作用提供了新的见解,与学者们专注于基督的身体作为基督教社区的象征形成鲜明对比;此外,她认为,对证人意图和情感的关注,正如中世纪法律理论所强调的那样,提供了一种对戏剧中的情感的理解,作为一种公共实践,不同于戏剧通常被认为参与的想象情感虔诚。第三章还讨论了审判剧,这一次探讨了见证作为一种介于个人和社会之间的活动。亚那和该亚法的动机并没有像原始文本中那样表现为嫉妒,而是用法律术语表达出来的。第四章从证人隐含的时间异步模型出发,讨论了约克的世界末日庆典。尽管……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cultures of Witnessing: Law and the York Plays by Emma Lipton (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Cultures of Witnessing: Law and the York Plays by Emma Lipton
  • Elisabeth Dutton (bio)
Emma Lipton. Cultures of Witnessing: Law and the York Plays. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2022. Pp. 248. $65.

Records of the York plays are preserved in the York Memorandum Books, manuscripts that also contain administrative records and charters defining and demonstrating York's politically powerful civic culture. These books offer some rationale for the approach that Emma Lipton follows in Cultures of Witnessing: the now firmly established interdisciplinary method that places the study of law alongside topics more generally explored in departments of language and literature. The York Plays are perhaps the most researched examples of medieval drama, but Lipton's approach does enable her to offer some new insights into their familiar material, particularly the Trial, Crucifixion and Last Judgment plays on which her discussion focuses.

The book first describes the particular legal privileges granted to the city of York by successive English kings: the negotiation of these privileges provides "crucial context for the depiction of legal witnessing in the York plays" (6). Also outlined in the Introduction is the rise in the legal significance of witnesses as a result of the ban, imposed by the Fourth Lateran Council, on trial by ordeal: witnessing and jury trials, however, relied "as much on rumor or shared knowledge as they did on direct perception" (9), and many individuals were disqualified as witnesses on the basis of condition, gender, age, reputation, and fortune. Nonetheless, witnessing was an important civic duty, contributing to local, legal identity within the city. Witness records are also here described as similar to records of performance, with their accounts of places, times and persons resembling "the unities of action, place and time long associated with the drama" (17). Of course, these unities were no concern of medieval drama itself, but they may suggest associations in the mind of the modern scholar of drama.

Subsequent chapters use medieval witnessing to theorize dramatic space, speech acts, affect, and temporality. Dramatic space is discussed in chapter 1 in relation to the York play of Christ's Entry into Jerusalem: unsurprisingly, comparison is drawn with the royal entry of King Henry IV into the city, but new light is cast on the comparison by Lipton's discussion of those present at the entry as if they were legal witnesses, "neighbors close enough to have seen and heard relevant events, or to have local knowledge of reputation accorded by spatial proximity" (24-5). The idea of the witness as neighbor then contributes to observations about the different stations around York at which each play was performed in turn: very localized spaces of individual performance were defined temporally by what small groups of witnesses could individually and collectively see and hear, "just as in legal witnessing the neighborhood came into being in the actions of seeing, hearing, and sharing knowledge" (44). [End Page 278]

The trial plays are the focus of chapter 2, which analyzes the speeches of Christ and the Beadle as models of witness testimony and good citizenship. Christ's reluctance to speak also reflects the ideal behavior prescribed in contemporary conduct books, this chapter argues. By contrast, the excessive speeches of Pilate and Herod identify them as tyrants according to the portraits of tyranny found in mirrors for princes. This is not new, but Lipton argues that her focus on witnessing offers fresh insight into the role of the body in speech, by contrast with scholars' concentration on Christ's body as symbol of the Christian community; furthermore, she argues that attention to a witness's intention and emotion, as emphasized by medieval legal theory, offers an understanding of affect in the plays as a public practice, different from the imaginative affective piety the plays are often thought to engage. Chapter 3 also discusses the trial plays, this time exploring witnessing as an activity poised between individual and social. The motives of Annas and Caiaphas are not presented as envious, as they are in the source texts, but rather are articulated in legal terms.

Chapter 4 discusses the York Doomsday pageant in the light of the asynchronous model of temporality implied by witness. Although...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COMPARATIVE DRAMA
COMPARATIVE DRAMA Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Comparative Drama (ISSN 0010-4078) is a scholarly journal devoted to studies international in spirit and interdisciplinary in scope; it is published quarterly (Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter) at Western Michigan University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信