结核分枝杆菌分子进化的悖论及其对结核病出现日期推断的影响

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
R. Zein-Eddine , F. Hak , A. Le Meur , C. Genestet , O. Dumitrescu , C. Guyeux , G. Senelle , C. Sola , G. Refrégier
{"title":"结核分枝杆菌分子进化的悖论及其对结核病出现日期推断的影响","authors":"R. Zein-Eddine ,&nbsp;F. Hak ,&nbsp;A. Le Meur ,&nbsp;C. Genestet ,&nbsp;O. Dumitrescu ,&nbsp;C. Guyeux ,&nbsp;G. Senelle ,&nbsp;C. Sola ,&nbsp;G. Refrégier","doi":"10.1016/j.tube.2023.102378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The date of <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> complex emergence has been the subject of long debates. New studies joining archaeological efforts with sequencing methods raise high hopes for solving whether this emergence is closer to 70,000 or to 6000 years before present.</p><p><span>Inferring the date of emergence of this pathogen<span> based on sequence data requires a molecular clock. Several clocks inferred from different types of loci and/or different samples, using both sound reasoning and reliable data, are actually very different, which we refer to as the paradoxes of </span></span><em>M. tuberculosis</em><span> molecular evolution. After having presented these paradoxes, we will remind the limits of the molecular clocks used in the different studies such as the assumption of homogeneous substitution rate. We will then review recent results that shed new light on the characteristics of </span><em>M. tuberculosis</em> molecular evolution: traces of diverse selection pressures, the impact of host dynamics, etc. We provide some ideas on what to do next to get nearer to a reliable dating of <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> complex emergence. Among them, the collection of additional remains from ancient tuberculosis seems still essential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23383,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 102378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The paradoxes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis molecular evolution and consequences for the inference of tuberculosis emergence date\",\"authors\":\"R. Zein-Eddine ,&nbsp;F. Hak ,&nbsp;A. Le Meur ,&nbsp;C. Genestet ,&nbsp;O. Dumitrescu ,&nbsp;C. Guyeux ,&nbsp;G. Senelle ,&nbsp;C. Sola ,&nbsp;G. Refrégier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tube.2023.102378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The date of <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> complex emergence has been the subject of long debates. New studies joining archaeological efforts with sequencing methods raise high hopes for solving whether this emergence is closer to 70,000 or to 6000 years before present.</p><p><span>Inferring the date of emergence of this pathogen<span> based on sequence data requires a molecular clock. Several clocks inferred from different types of loci and/or different samples, using both sound reasoning and reliable data, are actually very different, which we refer to as the paradoxes of </span></span><em>M. tuberculosis</em><span> molecular evolution. After having presented these paradoxes, we will remind the limits of the molecular clocks used in the different studies such as the assumption of homogeneous substitution rate. We will then review recent results that shed new light on the characteristics of </span><em>M. tuberculosis</em> molecular evolution: traces of diverse selection pressures, the impact of host dynamics, etc. We provide some ideas on what to do next to get nearer to a reliable dating of <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> complex emergence. Among them, the collection of additional remains from ancient tuberculosis seems still essential.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuberculosis\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuberculosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472979223000768\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472979223000768","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结核分枝杆菌复合体出现的日期一直是长期争论的主题。新的研究将考古工作与测序方法结合起来,为解决这种出现是在距今更近7万年还是6000年前提出了很高的希望。根据序列数据推断这种病原体出现的日期需要一个分子钟。利用合理的推理和可靠的数据,从不同类型的位点和/或不同的样本推断出的几个时钟实际上是非常不同的,我们称之为结核分枝杆菌分子进化的悖论。在提出这些矛盾之后,我们将提醒不同研究中使用的分子钟的局限性,例如均匀取代率的假设。然后,我们将回顾最近的研究结果,这些结果揭示了结核分枝杆菌分子进化的特征:多种选择压力的痕迹,宿主动力学的影响等。我们提供了一些想法,下一步该怎么做,以更接近可靠的日期结核分枝杆菌复合体的出现。其中,收集古代结核病的额外遗骸似乎仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The paradoxes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis molecular evolution and consequences for the inference of tuberculosis emergence date

The date of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex emergence has been the subject of long debates. New studies joining archaeological efforts with sequencing methods raise high hopes for solving whether this emergence is closer to 70,000 or to 6000 years before present.

Inferring the date of emergence of this pathogen based on sequence data requires a molecular clock. Several clocks inferred from different types of loci and/or different samples, using both sound reasoning and reliable data, are actually very different, which we refer to as the paradoxes of M. tuberculosis molecular evolution. After having presented these paradoxes, we will remind the limits of the molecular clocks used in the different studies such as the assumption of homogeneous substitution rate. We will then review recent results that shed new light on the characteristics of M. tuberculosis molecular evolution: traces of diverse selection pressures, the impact of host dynamics, etc. We provide some ideas on what to do next to get nearer to a reliable dating of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex emergence. Among them, the collection of additional remains from ancient tuberculosis seems still essential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Tuberculosis is a speciality journal focusing on basic experimental research on tuberculosis, notably on bacteriological, immunological and pathogenesis aspects of the disease. The journal publishes original research and reviews on the host response and immunology of tuberculosis and the molecular biology, genetics and physiology of the organism, however discourages submissions with a meta-analytical focus (for example, articles based on searches of published articles in public electronic databases, especially where there is lack of evidence of the personal involvement of authors in the generation of such material). We do not publish Clinical Case-Studies. Areas on which submissions are welcomed include: -Clinical TrialsDiagnostics- Antimicrobial resistance- Immunology- Leprosy- Microbiology, including microbial physiology- Molecular epidemiology- Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria- Pathogenesis- Pathology- Vaccine development. This Journal does not accept case-reports. The resurgence of interest in tuberculosis has accelerated the pace of relevant research and Tuberculosis has grown with it, as the only journal dedicated to experimental biomedical research in tuberculosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信