一项实用的阶梯式楔形聚类随机临床试验方案,测试行为经济实施策略,以增加极致密乳房患者的补充乳房MRI筛查。

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anne Marie McCarthy, Claudia Fernandez Perez, Rinad S Beidas, Justin E Bekelman, Daniel Blumenthal, Elizabeth Mack, Anna-Marika Bauer, Sarah Ehsan, Emily F Conant, Bernadette C Wheeler, Carmen E Guerra, Linda W Nunes, Peter Gabriel, Abigail Doucette, E Paul Wileyto, Alison M Buttenheim, David A Asch, Katharine A Rendle, Rachel C Shelton, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju, Sue Ware, Martina Plag, Steven Hyland, Tracy Gionta, Lawrence N Shulman, Robert Schnoll
{"title":"一项实用的阶梯式楔形聚类随机临床试验方案,测试行为经济实施策略,以增加极致密乳房患者的补充乳房MRI筛查。","authors":"Anne Marie McCarthy, Claudia Fernandez Perez, Rinad S Beidas, Justin E Bekelman, Daniel Blumenthal, Elizabeth Mack, Anna-Marika Bauer, Sarah Ehsan, Emily F Conant, Bernadette C Wheeler, Carmen E Guerra, Linda W Nunes, Peter Gabriel, Abigail Doucette, E Paul Wileyto, Alison M Buttenheim, David A Asch, Katharine A Rendle, Rachel C Shelton, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju, Sue Ware, Martina Plag, Steven Hyland, Tracy Gionta, Lawrence N Shulman, Robert Schnoll","doi":"10.1186/s13012-023-01323-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increased breast density augments breast cancer risk and reduces mammography sensitivity. Supplemental breast MRI screening can significantly increase cancer detection among women with dense breasts. However, few women undergo this exam, and screening is consistently lower among racially minoritized populations. Implementation strategies informed by behavioral economics (\"nudges\") can promote evidence-based practices by improving clinician decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. Nudges directed toward clinicians and patients may facilitate the implementation of supplemental breast MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Approximately 1600 patients identified as having extremely dense breasts after non-actionable mammograms, along with about 1100 clinicians involved with their care at 32 primary care or OB/GYN clinics across a racially diverse academically based health system, will be enrolled. A 2 × 2 randomized pragmatic trial will test nudges to patients, clinicians, both, or neither to promote supplemental breast MRI screening. Before implementation, rapid cycle approaches informed by clinician and patient experiences and behavioral economics and health equity frameworks guided nudge design. Clinicians will be clustered into clinic groups based on existing administrative departments and care patterns, and these clinic groups will be randomized to have the nudge activated at different times per a stepped wedge design. Clinicians will receive nudges integrated into the routine mammographic report or sent through electronic health record (EHR) in-basket messaging once their clinic group (i.e., wedge) is randomized to receive the intervention. Independently, patients will be randomized to receive text message nudges or not. The primary outcome will be defined as ordering or scheduling supplemental breast MRI. Secondary outcomes include MRI completion, cancer detection rates, and false-positive rates. Patient sociodemographic information and clinic-level variables will be examined as moderators of nudge effectiveness. Qualitative interviews conducted at the trial's conclusion will examine barriers and facilitators to implementation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will add to the growing literature on the effectiveness of behavioral economics-informed implementation strategies to promote evidence-based interventions. The design will facilitate testing the relative effects of nudges to patients and clinicians and the effects of moderators of nudge effectiveness, including key indicators of health disparities. The results may inform the introduction of low-cost, scalable implementation strategies to promote early breast cancer detection.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05787249. Registered on March 28, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":54995,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protocol for a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial testing behavioral economic implementation strategies to increase supplemental breast MRI screening among patients with extremely dense breasts.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Marie McCarthy, Claudia Fernandez Perez, Rinad S Beidas, Justin E Bekelman, Daniel Blumenthal, Elizabeth Mack, Anna-Marika Bauer, Sarah Ehsan, Emily F Conant, Bernadette C Wheeler, Carmen E Guerra, Linda W Nunes, Peter Gabriel, Abigail Doucette, E Paul Wileyto, Alison M Buttenheim, David A Asch, Katharine A Rendle, Rachel C Shelton, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju, Sue Ware, Martina Plag, Steven Hyland, Tracy Gionta, Lawrence N Shulman, Robert Schnoll\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13012-023-01323-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increased breast density augments breast cancer risk and reduces mammography sensitivity. Supplemental breast MRI screening can significantly increase cancer detection among women with dense breasts. However, few women undergo this exam, and screening is consistently lower among racially minoritized populations. Implementation strategies informed by behavioral economics (\\\"nudges\\\") can promote evidence-based practices by improving clinician decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. Nudges directed toward clinicians and patients may facilitate the implementation of supplemental breast MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Approximately 1600 patients identified as having extremely dense breasts after non-actionable mammograms, along with about 1100 clinicians involved with their care at 32 primary care or OB/GYN clinics across a racially diverse academically based health system, will be enrolled. A 2 × 2 randomized pragmatic trial will test nudges to patients, clinicians, both, or neither to promote supplemental breast MRI screening. Before implementation, rapid cycle approaches informed by clinician and patient experiences and behavioral economics and health equity frameworks guided nudge design. Clinicians will be clustered into clinic groups based on existing administrative departments and care patterns, and these clinic groups will be randomized to have the nudge activated at different times per a stepped wedge design. Clinicians will receive nudges integrated into the routine mammographic report or sent through electronic health record (EHR) in-basket messaging once their clinic group (i.e., wedge) is randomized to receive the intervention. Independently, patients will be randomized to receive text message nudges or not. The primary outcome will be defined as ordering or scheduling supplemental breast MRI. Secondary outcomes include MRI completion, cancer detection rates, and false-positive rates. Patient sociodemographic information and clinic-level variables will be examined as moderators of nudge effectiveness. Qualitative interviews conducted at the trial's conclusion will examine barriers and facilitators to implementation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will add to the growing literature on the effectiveness of behavioral economics-informed implementation strategies to promote evidence-based interventions. The design will facilitate testing the relative effects of nudges to patients and clinicians and the effects of moderators of nudge effectiveness, including key indicators of health disparities. The results may inform the introduction of low-cost, scalable implementation strategies to promote early breast cancer detection.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05787249. Registered on March 28, 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation Science\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01323-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01323-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺密度增加会增加患乳腺癌的风险,降低乳房x光检查的敏感性。补充乳腺MRI筛查可以显著提高致密乳房女性的癌症检出率。然而,很少有女性接受这项检查,而且在少数族裔人群中,筛查率一直较低。基于行为经济学的实施策略(“助推”)可以通过改善临床医生在不确定条件下的决策来促进循证实践。对临床医生和患者的督促可能会促进补充性乳腺MRI的实施。方法:将招募大约1600名在不可操作的乳房x光检查后被确定为极度致密乳房的患者,以及大约1100名在32个初级保健或妇产科诊所参与其护理的临床医生,这些诊所位于一个种族多元化的学术卫生系统中。一项2 × 2随机实用试验将测试对患者、临床医生、两者或两者都推动补充乳腺MRI筛查的效果。在实施之前,以临床医生和患者经验以及行为经济学和卫生公平框架为依据的快速循环方法指导了轻推设计。临床医生将根据现有的行政部门和护理模式聚集到临床组中,这些临床组将随机化,在不同的时间按阶梯式楔形设计激活轻推。一旦他们的临床组(即楔形)被随机分配接受干预,临床医生将收到整合到常规乳房x光检查报告或通过电子健康记录(EHR)收件箱消息发送的提示。另外,患者将随机接受或不接受短信激励。主要结果将被定义为订购或安排补充乳房MRI。次要结局包括MRI完成率、癌症检出率和假阳性率。患者的社会人口统计信息和临床水平变量将被检查作为轻推效果的调节因子。在试验结束时进行的定性访谈将审查实施的障碍和促进因素。讨论:本研究将为越来越多的关于行为经济学知情实施策略的有效性的文献提供补充,以促进循证干预。该设计将有助于测试轻推对患者和临床医生的相对影响,以及轻推有效性的调节因子的影响,包括健康差异的关键指标。该结果可能为引入低成本、可扩展的实施策略以促进早期乳腺癌检测提供信息。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05787249。注册日期:2023年3月28日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protocol for a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial testing behavioral economic implementation strategies to increase supplemental breast MRI screening among patients with extremely dense breasts.

Background: Increased breast density augments breast cancer risk and reduces mammography sensitivity. Supplemental breast MRI screening can significantly increase cancer detection among women with dense breasts. However, few women undergo this exam, and screening is consistently lower among racially minoritized populations. Implementation strategies informed by behavioral economics ("nudges") can promote evidence-based practices by improving clinician decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. Nudges directed toward clinicians and patients may facilitate the implementation of supplemental breast MRI.

Methods: Approximately 1600 patients identified as having extremely dense breasts after non-actionable mammograms, along with about 1100 clinicians involved with their care at 32 primary care or OB/GYN clinics across a racially diverse academically based health system, will be enrolled. A 2 × 2 randomized pragmatic trial will test nudges to patients, clinicians, both, or neither to promote supplemental breast MRI screening. Before implementation, rapid cycle approaches informed by clinician and patient experiences and behavioral economics and health equity frameworks guided nudge design. Clinicians will be clustered into clinic groups based on existing administrative departments and care patterns, and these clinic groups will be randomized to have the nudge activated at different times per a stepped wedge design. Clinicians will receive nudges integrated into the routine mammographic report or sent through electronic health record (EHR) in-basket messaging once their clinic group (i.e., wedge) is randomized to receive the intervention. Independently, patients will be randomized to receive text message nudges or not. The primary outcome will be defined as ordering or scheduling supplemental breast MRI. Secondary outcomes include MRI completion, cancer detection rates, and false-positive rates. Patient sociodemographic information and clinic-level variables will be examined as moderators of nudge effectiveness. Qualitative interviews conducted at the trial's conclusion will examine barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Discussion: This study will add to the growing literature on the effectiveness of behavioral economics-informed implementation strategies to promote evidence-based interventions. The design will facilitate testing the relative effects of nudges to patients and clinicians and the effects of moderators of nudge effectiveness, including key indicators of health disparities. The results may inform the introduction of low-cost, scalable implementation strategies to promote early breast cancer detection.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05787249. Registered on March 28, 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Implementation Science
Implementation Science 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Implementation Science is a leading journal committed to disseminating evidence on methods for integrating research findings into routine healthcare practice and policy. It offers a multidisciplinary platform for studying implementation strategies, encompassing their development, outcomes, economics, processes, and associated factors. The journal prioritizes rigorous studies and innovative, theory-based approaches, covering implementation science across various healthcare services and settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信