骨的独特研究

Frank Scheuchl, Elmar Peuker, Rainer Kamp
{"title":"骨的独特研究","authors":"Frank Scheuchl,&nbsp;Elmar Peuker,&nbsp;Rainer Kamp","doi":"10.1016/S1615-9071(23)00111-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Applied osteopathic medical research often focuses on external scientific evidence, with randomized controlled trials (RCT) and meta-analyses as the gold standard. Investigators mostly collect data on defined outcomes or evaluate the results of treatments from the perspective of the patients (patient-reported outcome measures – PROMs).</p><p>So far, a specifically osteopathic point of view on health disorders has played a minor role and is reported only sporadically. In order to be able to evaluate this field – which has until now received little interest – the instrument of OCROOMs (osteopathic clinicians-reported opinions and outcome measures) is proposed in the form of a mixed-methods approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100996,"journal":{"name":"Osteopathische Medizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Besonderheiten osteopathischer Forschung\",\"authors\":\"Frank Scheuchl,&nbsp;Elmar Peuker,&nbsp;Rainer Kamp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1615-9071(23)00111-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Applied osteopathic medical research often focuses on external scientific evidence, with randomized controlled trials (RCT) and meta-analyses as the gold standard. Investigators mostly collect data on defined outcomes or evaluate the results of treatments from the perspective of the patients (patient-reported outcome measures – PROMs).</p><p>So far, a specifically osteopathic point of view on health disorders has played a minor role and is reported only sporadically. In order to be able to evaluate this field – which has until now received little interest – the instrument of OCROOMs (osteopathic clinicians-reported opinions and outcome measures) is proposed in the form of a mixed-methods approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteopathische Medizin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteopathische Medizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1615907123001119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteopathische Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1615907123001119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

应用骨科医学研究通常侧重于外部科学证据,随机对照试验(RCT)和荟萃分析是黄金标准。研究人员主要收集确定结果的数据或从患者的角度评估治疗结果(患者报告的结果测量- PROMs)。到目前为止,一个具体的整骨疗法的观点对健康障碍起了次要的作用,只是零星的报道。为了能够评估这一领域——迄今为止很少有人对此感兴趣——OCROOMs(骨科临床医生报告意见和结果测量)的工具被提议以混合方法的形式提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Besonderheiten osteopathischer Forschung

Applied osteopathic medical research often focuses on external scientific evidence, with randomized controlled trials (RCT) and meta-analyses as the gold standard. Investigators mostly collect data on defined outcomes or evaluate the results of treatments from the perspective of the patients (patient-reported outcome measures – PROMs).

So far, a specifically osteopathic point of view on health disorders has played a minor role and is reported only sporadically. In order to be able to evaluate this field – which has until now received little interest – the instrument of OCROOMs (osteopathic clinicians-reported opinions and outcome measures) is proposed in the form of a mixed-methods approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信