{"title":"骨的独特研究","authors":"Frank Scheuchl, Elmar Peuker, Rainer Kamp","doi":"10.1016/S1615-9071(23)00111-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Applied osteopathic medical research often focuses on external scientific evidence, with randomized controlled trials (RCT) and meta-analyses as the gold standard. Investigators mostly collect data on defined outcomes or evaluate the results of treatments from the perspective of the patients (patient-reported outcome measures – PROMs).</p><p>So far, a specifically osteopathic point of view on health disorders has played a minor role and is reported only sporadically. In order to be able to evaluate this field – which has until now received little interest – the instrument of OCROOMs (osteopathic clinicians-reported opinions and outcome measures) is proposed in the form of a mixed-methods approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100996,"journal":{"name":"Osteopathische Medizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Besonderheiten osteopathischer Forschung\",\"authors\":\"Frank Scheuchl, Elmar Peuker, Rainer Kamp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1615-9071(23)00111-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Applied osteopathic medical research often focuses on external scientific evidence, with randomized controlled trials (RCT) and meta-analyses as the gold standard. Investigators mostly collect data on defined outcomes or evaluate the results of treatments from the perspective of the patients (patient-reported outcome measures – PROMs).</p><p>So far, a specifically osteopathic point of view on health disorders has played a minor role and is reported only sporadically. In order to be able to evaluate this field – which has until now received little interest – the instrument of OCROOMs (osteopathic clinicians-reported opinions and outcome measures) is proposed in the form of a mixed-methods approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteopathische Medizin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteopathische Medizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1615907123001119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteopathische Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1615907123001119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Applied osteopathic medical research often focuses on external scientific evidence, with randomized controlled trials (RCT) and meta-analyses as the gold standard. Investigators mostly collect data on defined outcomes or evaluate the results of treatments from the perspective of the patients (patient-reported outcome measures – PROMs).
So far, a specifically osteopathic point of view on health disorders has played a minor role and is reported only sporadically. In order to be able to evaluate this field – which has until now received little interest – the instrument of OCROOMs (osteopathic clinicians-reported opinions and outcome measures) is proposed in the form of a mixed-methods approach.