评估非特异性慢性颈部疼痛患者在颈部运动中加入整骨疗法的长期效果:一项随机试验

Sandro Groisman PhD, MSc , Luciano de Souza da Silva MS , Tamara Rocha Ribeiro Sanches MS , Clarice Sperotto dos Santos Rocha PhD , Tais Malysz PhD, MSc , Geraldo Pereira Jotz PhD, MSc
{"title":"评估非特异性慢性颈部疼痛患者在颈部运动中加入整骨疗法的长期效果:一项随机试验","authors":"Sandro Groisman PhD, MSc ,&nbsp;Luciano de Souza da Silva MS ,&nbsp;Tamara Rocha Ribeiro Sanches MS ,&nbsp;Clarice Sperotto dos Santos Rocha PhD ,&nbsp;Tais Malysz PhD, MSc ,&nbsp;Geraldo Pereira Jotz PhD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2023.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of adding osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) to neck exercises compared to exercises alone for individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain (NCNP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A randomized controlled trial<span> was conducted by assigning 90 individuals with NCNP into the following 2 groups: (1) exercises group (EG, n = 45) or (2) OMT plus exercises group (OMT/EG, n = 45). All participants received 4 weeks of treatment. The clinical outcomes were recorded at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after the treatment. The primary outcomes were pain and function—Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Pressure Pain Threshold<span>, and the Neck Disability Index<span> (NDI). The secondary outcomes included range of motion for cervical spine rotation, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In comparison to baseline data, both groups had a reduction of NPRS (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) and NDI (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) after the treatment. However, no statistically significant differences in pain intensity or disability were found when OMT/EG was compared to EG alone at 3 months (<em>P</em> = 0.1 and <em>P</em> = 0.2, respectively) and at 6 months (<em>P</em> = 0.4 and <em>P</em> = 0.9, respectively for pain and disability) and no difference was found between OMT/EG and the EG in the secondary outcomes during the same follow-up period (<em>P</em> &gt; .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Outcomes of pain and functionality for patients in both groups were improved at 6 months. Our findings show that the combination of OMT and neck exercises for 4 weeks did not improve functionality and reduction of pain in patients with NCNP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Long-term Effects of Adding Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment to Neck Exercises for Individuals With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Trial\",\"authors\":\"Sandro Groisman PhD, MSc ,&nbsp;Luciano de Souza da Silva MS ,&nbsp;Tamara Rocha Ribeiro Sanches MS ,&nbsp;Clarice Sperotto dos Santos Rocha PhD ,&nbsp;Tais Malysz PhD, MSc ,&nbsp;Geraldo Pereira Jotz PhD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcm.2023.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of adding osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) to neck exercises compared to exercises alone for individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain (NCNP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A randomized controlled trial<span> was conducted by assigning 90 individuals with NCNP into the following 2 groups: (1) exercises group (EG, n = 45) or (2) OMT plus exercises group (OMT/EG, n = 45). All participants received 4 weeks of treatment. The clinical outcomes were recorded at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after the treatment. The primary outcomes were pain and function—Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Pressure Pain Threshold<span>, and the Neck Disability Index<span> (NDI). The secondary outcomes included range of motion for cervical spine rotation, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In comparison to baseline data, both groups had a reduction of NPRS (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) and NDI (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) after the treatment. However, no statistically significant differences in pain intensity or disability were found when OMT/EG was compared to EG alone at 3 months (<em>P</em> = 0.1 and <em>P</em> = 0.2, respectively) and at 6 months (<em>P</em> = 0.4 and <em>P</em> = 0.9, respectively for pain and disability) and no difference was found between OMT/EG and the EG in the secondary outcomes during the same follow-up period (<em>P</em> &gt; .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Outcomes of pain and functionality for patients in both groups were improved at 6 months. Our findings show that the combination of OMT and neck exercises for 4 weeks did not improve functionality and reduction of pain in patients with NCNP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370723000597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370723000597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究的目的是评估在颈部运动中加入整骨疗法(OMT)与单独运动对非特异性慢性颈部疼痛(NCNP)患者的长期效果。方法采用随机对照试验,将90例NCNP患者分为2组:(1)运动组(EG, n = 45)和(2)OMT +运动组(OMT/EG, n = 45)。所有参与者均接受4周的治疗。临床结果记录在基线和治疗后3和6个月。主要结果是疼痛和功能-数值疼痛评定量表(NPRS),压痛阈值和颈部残疾指数(NDI)。次要结果包括颈椎旋转活动度、恐惧-回避信念问卷和疼痛自我效能问卷。结果与基线数据比较,两组患者NPRS均降低(P <P <0.05)。然而,在3个月时(分别为P = 0.1和P = 0.2)和6个月时(疼痛和残疾分别为P = 0.4和P = 0.9),OMT/EG与EG在同一随访期内的次要结局无统计学差异(P >. 05)。结论6个月时两组患者疼痛和功能均有改善。我们的研究结果表明,OMT联合颈部运动4周并没有改善NCNP患者的功能和减轻疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Long-term Effects of Adding Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment to Neck Exercises for Individuals With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Trial

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of adding osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) to neck exercises compared to exercises alone for individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain (NCNP).

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was conducted by assigning 90 individuals with NCNP into the following 2 groups: (1) exercises group (EG, n = 45) or (2) OMT plus exercises group (OMT/EG, n = 45). All participants received 4 weeks of treatment. The clinical outcomes were recorded at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after the treatment. The primary outcomes were pain and function—Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Pressure Pain Threshold, and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). The secondary outcomes included range of motion for cervical spine rotation, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.

Results

In comparison to baseline data, both groups had a reduction of NPRS (P < .05) and NDI (P < .05) after the treatment. However, no statistically significant differences in pain intensity or disability were found when OMT/EG was compared to EG alone at 3 months (P = 0.1 and P = 0.2, respectively) and at 6 months (P = 0.4 and P = 0.9, respectively for pain and disability) and no difference was found between OMT/EG and the EG in the secondary outcomes during the same follow-up period (P > .05).

Conclusion

Outcomes of pain and functionality for patients in both groups were improved at 6 months. Our findings show that the combination of OMT and neck exercises for 4 weeks did not improve functionality and reduction of pain in patients with NCNP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信