在意大利和日本,对技术的亲和力和群体凝聚力与社会隔离期间的心理健康有关

Marlena R. Fraune , Danielle Langlois , Harrison Preusse , Jennifer Rheman , Katrina Ling , Katherine M. Tsui
{"title":"在意大利和日本,对技术的亲和力和群体凝聚力与社会隔离期间的心理健康有关","authors":"Marlena R. Fraune ,&nbsp;Danielle Langlois ,&nbsp;Harrison Preusse ,&nbsp;Jennifer Rheman ,&nbsp;Katrina Ling ,&nbsp;Katherine M. Tsui","doi":"10.1016/j.teler.2023.100109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social group cohesion and social support are critical for positive mental health. People may use technology to maintain existing, or even create new, social groups – particularly when in-person contact is limited. During the global COVID-19 pandemic, countries mandated various stay-at-home orders; for many people worldwide, this was their first experience of extended periods of social isolation. To better understand the relationship of affinity for technology, group cohesion, and mental health depending on change in social isolation, we surveyed people based on country. We studied Italy because of its relatively large increase in social isolation, and we studied Japan because of its relatively small increase in social isolation. We surveyed participants about <em>existing</em> and <em>new</em> social groups in a country that strongly socially isolated (Study 1: Italy, <em>n</em> = 426) and one with few changes from normal (Study 2: Japan, <em>n</em> = 280). We collected data in June 2020, several months after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Affinity for technology related to increased group cohesion and mental health depending on country and on whether groups were new or existing. Dimensions of group cohesion had varied effects on mental health. We synthesize results from this work and a prior study in the United States (U.S., <em>n</em> = 276), which had a very mixed approach to dealing with COVID-19 that differed from approaches in Italy and Japan. Finally, we discuss overall patterns across all three countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101213,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503023000695/pdfft?md5=c6ee278037690a65e8029e4a39d31b73&pid=1-s2.0-S2772503023000695-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Affinity for technology and group cohesion link to mental health during social isolation in Italy and Japan\",\"authors\":\"Marlena R. Fraune ,&nbsp;Danielle Langlois ,&nbsp;Harrison Preusse ,&nbsp;Jennifer Rheman ,&nbsp;Katrina Ling ,&nbsp;Katherine M. Tsui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teler.2023.100109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Social group cohesion and social support are critical for positive mental health. People may use technology to maintain existing, or even create new, social groups – particularly when in-person contact is limited. During the global COVID-19 pandemic, countries mandated various stay-at-home orders; for many people worldwide, this was their first experience of extended periods of social isolation. To better understand the relationship of affinity for technology, group cohesion, and mental health depending on change in social isolation, we surveyed people based on country. We studied Italy because of its relatively large increase in social isolation, and we studied Japan because of its relatively small increase in social isolation. We surveyed participants about <em>existing</em> and <em>new</em> social groups in a country that strongly socially isolated (Study 1: Italy, <em>n</em> = 426) and one with few changes from normal (Study 2: Japan, <em>n</em> = 280). We collected data in June 2020, several months after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Affinity for technology related to increased group cohesion and mental health depending on country and on whether groups were new or existing. Dimensions of group cohesion had varied effects on mental health. We synthesize results from this work and a prior study in the United States (U.S., <em>n</em> = 276), which had a very mixed approach to dealing with COVID-19 that differed from approaches in Italy and Japan. Finally, we discuss overall patterns across all three countries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telematics and Informatics Reports\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503023000695/pdfft?md5=c6ee278037690a65e8029e4a39d31b73&pid=1-s2.0-S2772503023000695-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telematics and Informatics Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503023000695\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503023000695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会群体凝聚力和社会支持对积极的心理健康至关重要。人们可能会使用技术来维持现有的社会群体,甚至创建新的社会群体——尤其是在面对面接触有限的情况下。在全球COVID-19大流行期间,各国颁布了各种居家令;对于世界各地的许多人来说,这是他们第一次经历长期的社会孤立。为了更好地理解对技术的亲和力、群体凝聚力和心理健康的关系取决于社会孤立的变化,我们根据国家对人们进行了调查。我们研究意大利是因为它的社会孤立程度增加相对较大,我们研究日本是因为它的社会孤立程度增加相对较小。我们在一个社会隔离程度很高的国家(研究1:意大利,n = 426)和一个与正常情况变化不大的国家(研究2:日本,n = 280)调查了参与者现有的和新的社会群体。我们在2019冠状病毒病大流行爆发几个月后的2020年6月收集了数据。对技术的亲近感与增加群体凝聚力和心理健康有关,这取决于国家和群体是新的还是现有的。群体凝聚力各维度对心理健康的影响各不相同。我们综合了这项工作的结果和美国之前的一项研究(美国,n = 276),该研究采用了一种非常混合的方法来处理COVID-19,与意大利和日本的方法不同。最后,我们讨论了这三个国家的总体模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Affinity for technology and group cohesion link to mental health during social isolation in Italy and Japan

Social group cohesion and social support are critical for positive mental health. People may use technology to maintain existing, or even create new, social groups – particularly when in-person contact is limited. During the global COVID-19 pandemic, countries mandated various stay-at-home orders; for many people worldwide, this was their first experience of extended periods of social isolation. To better understand the relationship of affinity for technology, group cohesion, and mental health depending on change in social isolation, we surveyed people based on country. We studied Italy because of its relatively large increase in social isolation, and we studied Japan because of its relatively small increase in social isolation. We surveyed participants about existing and new social groups in a country that strongly socially isolated (Study 1: Italy, n = 426) and one with few changes from normal (Study 2: Japan, n = 280). We collected data in June 2020, several months after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Affinity for technology related to increased group cohesion and mental health depending on country and on whether groups were new or existing. Dimensions of group cohesion had varied effects on mental health. We synthesize results from this work and a prior study in the United States (U.S., n = 276), which had a very mixed approach to dealing with COVID-19 that differed from approaches in Italy and Japan. Finally, we discuss overall patterns across all three countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信