{"title":"高分辨率电子显微镜用细胞骨架全支架制备的相关问题。","authors":"P B Bell, M Lindroth, B A Fredriksson, X D Liu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The resolution currently available in both transmission and scanning electron microscopes is theoretically adequate to visualize the organization of the cytoskeleton at the supramolecular and macromolecular levels. However, achieving this resolution in practice requires that the methods used to prepare the specimens both preserve the structures of interest and render them visible for observation in the microscope without obscuring or altering them. In this paper we discuss our own and others efforts to develop methods to overcome several problems associated with preparing whole mounts of cytoskeletons for observation by electron microscopy. These problems include: controlling the degree to which cellular components are extracted; the effects of osmium tetroxide on the cytoskeleton; controlling and recognizing shrinkage and drying artifacts; the choice of a method of visualization; deposition of grain-free ultrathin films of metal; and interpreting the results. The standard procedure which we currently use consists of the following steps: growing cells on carbon-stabilized Formvar-coated gold electron microscope grids; extracting in 0.5% Triton X-100 detergent in a microtubule stabilizing buffer; postfixing in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in stabilizing buffer; freeze-drying; magnetron sputter-coating with 1.5 nm of tungsten; and observation by TEM, SEM, or STEM. Cytoskeletons prepared in this manner contain over 100 polypeptides and are composed of a complex three dimensional meshwork of clean, uniform filaments, the smallest of which are 7 nm in diameter. A structure resembling the microtrabecular lattice is present only if the cells are prefixed with a relatively long bifunctional protein crosslinking reagent prior to extraction with detergent.</p>","PeriodicalId":77379,"journal":{"name":"Scanning microscopy. Supplement","volume":"3 ","pages":"117-34; discussion 134-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problems associated with the preparation of whole mounts of cytoskeletons for high resolution electron microscopy.\",\"authors\":\"P B Bell, M Lindroth, B A Fredriksson, X D Liu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The resolution currently available in both transmission and scanning electron microscopes is theoretically adequate to visualize the organization of the cytoskeleton at the supramolecular and macromolecular levels. However, achieving this resolution in practice requires that the methods used to prepare the specimens both preserve the structures of interest and render them visible for observation in the microscope without obscuring or altering them. In this paper we discuss our own and others efforts to develop methods to overcome several problems associated with preparing whole mounts of cytoskeletons for observation by electron microscopy. These problems include: controlling the degree to which cellular components are extracted; the effects of osmium tetroxide on the cytoskeleton; controlling and recognizing shrinkage and drying artifacts; the choice of a method of visualization; deposition of grain-free ultrathin films of metal; and interpreting the results. The standard procedure which we currently use consists of the following steps: growing cells on carbon-stabilized Formvar-coated gold electron microscope grids; extracting in 0.5% Triton X-100 detergent in a microtubule stabilizing buffer; postfixing in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in stabilizing buffer; freeze-drying; magnetron sputter-coating with 1.5 nm of tungsten; and observation by TEM, SEM, or STEM. Cytoskeletons prepared in this manner contain over 100 polypeptides and are composed of a complex three dimensional meshwork of clean, uniform filaments, the smallest of which are 7 nm in diameter. A structure resembling the microtrabecular lattice is present only if the cells are prefixed with a relatively long bifunctional protein crosslinking reagent prior to extraction with detergent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scanning microscopy. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"117-34; discussion 134-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scanning microscopy. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scanning microscopy. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Problems associated with the preparation of whole mounts of cytoskeletons for high resolution electron microscopy.
The resolution currently available in both transmission and scanning electron microscopes is theoretically adequate to visualize the organization of the cytoskeleton at the supramolecular and macromolecular levels. However, achieving this resolution in practice requires that the methods used to prepare the specimens both preserve the structures of interest and render them visible for observation in the microscope without obscuring or altering them. In this paper we discuss our own and others efforts to develop methods to overcome several problems associated with preparing whole mounts of cytoskeletons for observation by electron microscopy. These problems include: controlling the degree to which cellular components are extracted; the effects of osmium tetroxide on the cytoskeleton; controlling and recognizing shrinkage and drying artifacts; the choice of a method of visualization; deposition of grain-free ultrathin films of metal; and interpreting the results. The standard procedure which we currently use consists of the following steps: growing cells on carbon-stabilized Formvar-coated gold electron microscope grids; extracting in 0.5% Triton X-100 detergent in a microtubule stabilizing buffer; postfixing in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in stabilizing buffer; freeze-drying; magnetron sputter-coating with 1.5 nm of tungsten; and observation by TEM, SEM, or STEM. Cytoskeletons prepared in this manner contain over 100 polypeptides and are composed of a complex three dimensional meshwork of clean, uniform filaments, the smallest of which are 7 nm in diameter. A structure resembling the microtrabecular lattice is present only if the cells are prefixed with a relatively long bifunctional protein crosslinking reagent prior to extraction with detergent.