澳大利亚的死后受孕——法律和伦理考虑。

Q2 Medicine
Medico-Legal Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-24 DOI:10.1177/00258172231200839
Alex Polyakov, Jacqueline Piskopos, Genia Rozen
{"title":"澳大利亚的死后受孕——法律和伦理考虑。","authors":"Alex Polyakov, Jacqueline Piskopos, Genia Rozen","doi":"10.1177/00258172231200839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Posthumous conception, the ability to conceive a child after the death of one partner, is increasingly prevalent due to advances in Artificial Reproduction Technology (ART). This paper considers the complexities surrounding the practice in Australia, focusing primarily on the ethical and legal dimensions. It observes that state-based regulations in Australia create disparities in accessibility: some states prohibit the procedure without the deceased's written consent, while others permit it based on guidelines or lack explicit prohibitions. Addressing the juxtaposition of Will Theory and Interest Theory, it emphasises the ongoing debate on whether rights, particularly reproductive autonomy, outlive a person's demise. Finally, the paper highlights an evident inconsistency in Australian legislation and promotes a uniform approach across states.</p>","PeriodicalId":35529,"journal":{"name":"Medico-Legal Journal","volume":" ","pages":"86-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posthumous conception in Australia - legal and ethical considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Polyakov, Jacqueline Piskopos, Genia Rozen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00258172231200839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Posthumous conception, the ability to conceive a child after the death of one partner, is increasingly prevalent due to advances in Artificial Reproduction Technology (ART). This paper considers the complexities surrounding the practice in Australia, focusing primarily on the ethical and legal dimensions. It observes that state-based regulations in Australia create disparities in accessibility: some states prohibit the procedure without the deceased's written consent, while others permit it based on guidelines or lack explicit prohibitions. Addressing the juxtaposition of Will Theory and Interest Theory, it emphasises the ongoing debate on whether rights, particularly reproductive autonomy, outlive a person's demise. Finally, the paper highlights an evident inconsistency in Australian legislation and promotes a uniform approach across states.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medico-Legal Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"86-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medico-Legal Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00258172231200839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medico-Legal Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00258172231200839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于人工生殖技术(ART)的进步,死后受孕,即在伴侣一方死亡后怀上孩子的能力,越来越普遍。本文考虑了澳大利亚实践的复杂性,主要集中在道德和法律方面。委员会注意到,澳大利亚以州为基础的法规造成了可及性方面的差异:一些州禁止未经死者书面同意的手术,而另一些州则根据指导方针或缺乏明确的禁令允许这种手术。为了解决意志理论和利益理论的并置问题,它强调了正在进行的关于权利,特别是生育自主权,是否在人死后仍然存在的辩论。最后,本文强调了澳大利亚立法的明显不一致性,并促进了各州统一的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Posthumous conception in Australia - legal and ethical considerations.

Posthumous conception, the ability to conceive a child after the death of one partner, is increasingly prevalent due to advances in Artificial Reproduction Technology (ART). This paper considers the complexities surrounding the practice in Australia, focusing primarily on the ethical and legal dimensions. It observes that state-based regulations in Australia create disparities in accessibility: some states prohibit the procedure without the deceased's written consent, while others permit it based on guidelines or lack explicit prohibitions. Addressing the juxtaposition of Will Theory and Interest Theory, it emphasises the ongoing debate on whether rights, particularly reproductive autonomy, outlive a person's demise. Finally, the paper highlights an evident inconsistency in Australian legislation and promotes a uniform approach across states.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medico-Legal Journal
Medico-Legal Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Medico-Legal journal is the official journal of Medico-Legal Society. The Royal Society of Medicine Press is delighted to announce the launch in July 2009 of the Medico-Legal journal, on behalf of the Medico-Legal Society. The Medico-Legal Journal provides an official record of the proceedings of the Medico-Legal Society, and is dedicated to promoting Medico-Legal knowledge in all its aspects. As well as providing a record of activity in the Society, the journal includes a unique collection of contributions and speeches from eminent speakers at society events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信