两种小鼠系在出生体重环境变异的不同选择下纯合子的差异模式。

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Candela Ojeda-Marín, Juan Pablo Gutiérrez, Nora Formoso-Rafferty, Félix Goyache, Isabel Cervantes
{"title":"两种小鼠系在出生体重环境变异的不同选择下纯合子的差异模式。","authors":"Candela Ojeda-Marín,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Gutiérrez,&nbsp;Nora Formoso-Rafferty,&nbsp;Félix Goyache,&nbsp;Isabel Cervantes","doi":"10.1111/jbg.12835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Runs of homozygosity (ROH) are defined as long continuous homozygous stretches in the genome which are assumed to originate from a common ancestor. It has been demonstrated that divergent selection for variability in mice is possible and that low variability in birth weight is associated with robustness. To analyse ROH patterns and ROH-based genomic inbreeding, two mouse lines that were divergently selected for birth weight variability for 26 generations were used, with: 752 individuals for the high variability line (H-Line), 766 individuals for the low variability line (L-Line) and 74 individuals as a reference population. Individuals were genotyped using the high density Affymetrix Mouse Diversity Genotyping Array. ROH were identified using both the sliding windows (SW) and the consecutive runs (CR) methods. Inbreeding coefficients were calculated based on pedigree (<i>F</i><sub>PED</sub>) information, on ROH identified using the SW method (<i>F</i><sub>ROHSW</sub>) and on ROH identified using the CR method (<i>F</i><sub>ROHCR</sub>). Differences in genomic inbreeding were not consistent across generations and these parameters did not show clear differences between lines. Correlations between <i>F</i><sub>PED</sub> and <i>F</i><sub>ROH</sub> were high, particularly for <i>F</i><sub>ROHSW</sub>. Moreover, correlations between <i>F</i><sub>ROHSW</sub> and <i>F</i><sub>PED</sub> were even higher when ROH were identified with no restrictions in the number of heterozygotes per ROH. The comparison of <i>F</i><sub>ROH</sub> estimates between either of the selected lines were based on significant differences at the chromosome level, mainly in chromosomes 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 15 and 19. ROH-based inbreeding estimates that were computed using longer homozygous segments had a higher relationship with <i>F</i><sub>PED</sub>. Differences in robustness between lines were not attributable to a higher homozygosis in the L-Line, but maybe to the different distribution of ROH at the chromosome level between lines. The analysis identified a set of genomic regions for future research to establish the genomic basis of robustness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","volume":"141 2","pages":"193-206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbg.12835","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential patterns in runs of homozygosity in two mice lines under divergent selection for environmental variability for birth weight\",\"authors\":\"Candela Ojeda-Marín,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Gutiérrez,&nbsp;Nora Formoso-Rafferty,&nbsp;Félix Goyache,&nbsp;Isabel Cervantes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbg.12835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Runs of homozygosity (ROH) are defined as long continuous homozygous stretches in the genome which are assumed to originate from a common ancestor. It has been demonstrated that divergent selection for variability in mice is possible and that low variability in birth weight is associated with robustness. To analyse ROH patterns and ROH-based genomic inbreeding, two mouse lines that were divergently selected for birth weight variability for 26 generations were used, with: 752 individuals for the high variability line (H-Line), 766 individuals for the low variability line (L-Line) and 74 individuals as a reference population. Individuals were genotyped using the high density Affymetrix Mouse Diversity Genotyping Array. ROH were identified using both the sliding windows (SW) and the consecutive runs (CR) methods. Inbreeding coefficients were calculated based on pedigree (<i>F</i><sub>PED</sub>) information, on ROH identified using the SW method (<i>F</i><sub>ROHSW</sub>) and on ROH identified using the CR method (<i>F</i><sub>ROHCR</sub>). Differences in genomic inbreeding were not consistent across generations and these parameters did not show clear differences between lines. Correlations between <i>F</i><sub>PED</sub> and <i>F</i><sub>ROH</sub> were high, particularly for <i>F</i><sub>ROHSW</sub>. Moreover, correlations between <i>F</i><sub>ROHSW</sub> and <i>F</i><sub>PED</sub> were even higher when ROH were identified with no restrictions in the number of heterozygotes per ROH. The comparison of <i>F</i><sub>ROH</sub> estimates between either of the selected lines were based on significant differences at the chromosome level, mainly in chromosomes 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 15 and 19. ROH-based inbreeding estimates that were computed using longer homozygous segments had a higher relationship with <i>F</i><sub>PED</sub>. Differences in robustness between lines were not attributable to a higher homozygosis in the L-Line, but maybe to the different distribution of ROH at the chromosome level between lines. The analysis identified a set of genomic regions for future research to establish the genomic basis of robustness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics\",\"volume\":\"141 2\",\"pages\":\"193-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbg.12835\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbg.12835\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbg.12835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纯合子序列(runof homozygosity, ROH)被定义为基因组中长而连续的纯合子延伸,它们被认为起源于一个共同的祖先。已经证明,小鼠的差异性选择是可能的,并且出生体重的低变异性与健壮性有关。为了分析ROH模式和基于ROH的基因组近交,使用了26代的两个小鼠系,高变异性系(H-Line) 752个,低变异性系(L-Line) 766个,作为参考群体74个。使用高密度Affymetrix小鼠多样性基因分型阵列对个体进行基因分型。采用滑动窗口(SW)和连续运行(CR)方法识别ROH。根据家系(FPED)信息、SW法(FROHSW)和CR法(FROHCR)鉴定的ROH计算近交系数。基因组近交的差异在代际间不一致,这些参数在品系间没有明显差异。FPED和FROH之间的相关性很高,尤其是FROHSW。此外,当对每个ROH的杂合子数量没有限制时,FROHSW和FPED之间的相关性甚至更高。在染色体水平上,主要在3、4、6、8、11、15和19号染色体上存在显著差异。使用较长的纯合片段计算的基于roh的近交估计值与FPED的关系较高。株系间的鲁棒性差异不是由于L-Line的高纯合子,而可能是由于株系间ROH在染色体水平上的不同分布。分析确定了一组基因组区域,为未来的研究建立健壮性的基因组基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Differential patterns in runs of homozygosity in two mice lines under divergent selection for environmental variability for birth weight

Differential patterns in runs of homozygosity in two mice lines under divergent selection for environmental variability for birth weight

Runs of homozygosity (ROH) are defined as long continuous homozygous stretches in the genome which are assumed to originate from a common ancestor. It has been demonstrated that divergent selection for variability in mice is possible and that low variability in birth weight is associated with robustness. To analyse ROH patterns and ROH-based genomic inbreeding, two mouse lines that were divergently selected for birth weight variability for 26 generations were used, with: 752 individuals for the high variability line (H-Line), 766 individuals for the low variability line (L-Line) and 74 individuals as a reference population. Individuals were genotyped using the high density Affymetrix Mouse Diversity Genotyping Array. ROH were identified using both the sliding windows (SW) and the consecutive runs (CR) methods. Inbreeding coefficients were calculated based on pedigree (FPED) information, on ROH identified using the SW method (FROHSW) and on ROH identified using the CR method (FROHCR). Differences in genomic inbreeding were not consistent across generations and these parameters did not show clear differences between lines. Correlations between FPED and FROH were high, particularly for FROHSW. Moreover, correlations between FROHSW and FPED were even higher when ROH were identified with no restrictions in the number of heterozygotes per ROH. The comparison of FROH estimates between either of the selected lines were based on significant differences at the chromosome level, mainly in chromosomes 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 15 and 19. ROH-based inbreeding estimates that were computed using longer homozygous segments had a higher relationship with FPED. Differences in robustness between lines were not attributable to a higher homozygosis in the L-Line, but maybe to the different distribution of ROH at the chromosome level between lines. The analysis identified a set of genomic regions for future research to establish the genomic basis of robustness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics publishes original articles by international scientists on genomic selection, and any other topic related to breeding programmes, selection, quantitative genetic, genomics, diversity and evolution of domestic animals. Researchers, teachers, and the animal breeding industry will find the reports of interest. Book reviews appear in many issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信