刑事责任

Simon Wilson
{"title":"刑事责任","authors":"Simon Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite our intuitions, there is no generally agreed definition of criminal responsibility. Here, the relevant English legal background, the mental condition defences, and the main philosophical theories of criminal responsibility are reviewed. The latter are the choice and capacity theories, character theory, agency theory, social theory, and the definitional theory. The psychiatric defences of insanity and diminished responsibility are considered in respect of each of these theories. Although criminal responsibility does not have any explicit role in English criminal law, it does pervade the system, and the problem with the lack of any generally agreed approach is perhaps most starkly exposed when the mental condition defences are contested in court.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88653,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)","volume":"8 12","pages":"Pages 473-475"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.09.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criminal responsibility\",\"authors\":\"Simon Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite our intuitions, there is no generally agreed definition of criminal responsibility. Here, the relevant English legal background, the mental condition defences, and the main philosophical theories of criminal responsibility are reviewed. The latter are the choice and capacity theories, character theory, agency theory, social theory, and the definitional theory. The psychiatric defences of insanity and diminished responsibility are considered in respect of each of these theories. Although criminal responsibility does not have any explicit role in English criminal law, it does pervade the system, and the problem with the lack of any generally agreed approach is perhaps most starkly exposed when the mental condition defences are contested in court.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)\",\"volume\":\"8 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 473-475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.09.003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147617930900202X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147617930900202X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与我们的直觉不同,对于刑事责任并没有一个公认的定义。在此,对相关的英国法律背景、精神状态抗辩以及刑事责任的主要哲学理论进行了回顾。后者包括选择与能力理论、性格理论、代理理论、社会理论和定义理论。精神病学对精神错乱和责任减少的辩护是根据这些理论来考虑的。尽管刑事责任在英国刑法中没有任何明确的角色,但它确实在整个体系中无处不在。当精神状况辩护在法庭上受到质疑时,缺乏普遍认可的方法的问题可能最为明显地暴露出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Criminal responsibility

Despite our intuitions, there is no generally agreed definition of criminal responsibility. Here, the relevant English legal background, the mental condition defences, and the main philosophical theories of criminal responsibility are reviewed. The latter are the choice and capacity theories, character theory, agency theory, social theory, and the definitional theory. The psychiatric defences of insanity and diminished responsibility are considered in respect of each of these theories. Although criminal responsibility does not have any explicit role in English criminal law, it does pervade the system, and the problem with the lack of any generally agreed approach is perhaps most starkly exposed when the mental condition defences are contested in court.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信