针刺相关疗法治疗原发性痛经的随机对照试验的循证研究方法:一项meta研究。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1007/s11655-023-3711-3
Xiao-Yi Hu, Zi-Yu Tian, Huan Chen, Xiang-Yu Hu, Tian-Yu Ming, Hao-Xuan Peng, Rui-Min Jiao, Lan-Jun Shi, Wen-Cui Xiu, Ji-Wei Yang, Wei-Juan Gang, Xiang-Hong Jing
{"title":"针刺相关疗法治疗原发性痛经的随机对照试验的循证研究方法:一项meta研究。","authors":"Xiao-Yi Hu, Zi-Yu Tian, Huan Chen, Xiang-Yu Hu, Tian-Yu Ming, Hao-Xuan Peng, Rui-Min Jiao, Lan-Jun Shi, Wen-Cui Xiu, Ji-Wei Yang, Wei-Juan Gang, Xiang-Hong Jing","doi":"10.1007/s11655-023-3711-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the use of evidence-based research (EBR) approach in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture-related therapies for primary dysmenorrhea (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database were searched from January 2013 to December 2022 for RCTs of acupuncture on PD. The full text and references of each RCT were read to assess whether systematic reviews (SRs) or other types of studies with similar research questions and end-users' perspectives were cited to justify and design the trial. In addition, the discussion section were analyzed to evaluate whether trials placed the new result in the existing SRs to draw a conclusion. Multivariable logistic regression was used to find variables that associated with 3 aspects of EBR approach: (1) citing clinical studies for justification, (2) citing relevant studies that obtain the perspectives of end users, and (3) citing clinical studies for results discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 473 RCTs included, 45.67% (216) of the trials cited relevant similar studies, 21.56% (102) referenced to the studies that collected end-users' perspectives, and 10.99% (52) placed result in the context of the previous research. Few RCTs appropriately applied EBR approach. Among all the included studies, 3.17% (15) of the trials used SRs to inform study questions but none of them used updated SRs with acceptable quality; 1.05% (5) of the trials cited SRs of end-user's perspectives in the justification and design of the study, and only 1 trial added results in existing SR to draw a conclusion. Year of publication, language, funding, registration, ethical approval and number of sites were significantly associated with 1 of the 3 aspects of EBR approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few RCTs in acupuncture-related therapies for PD used the EBR approach to minimize research redundancy. Researchers, research institutes, funding agencies, ethics committees, journals and peer reviewers in acupuncture should make efforts to use and promote the EBR approach to ensure the value of new trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10005,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"551-558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Evidence-Based Research Approach in RCTs of Acupuncture-Related Therapies for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Meta-Research.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Yi Hu, Zi-Yu Tian, Huan Chen, Xiang-Yu Hu, Tian-Yu Ming, Hao-Xuan Peng, Rui-Min Jiao, Lan-Jun Shi, Wen-Cui Xiu, Ji-Wei Yang, Wei-Juan Gang, Xiang-Hong Jing\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11655-023-3711-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the use of evidence-based research (EBR) approach in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture-related therapies for primary dysmenorrhea (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database were searched from January 2013 to December 2022 for RCTs of acupuncture on PD. The full text and references of each RCT were read to assess whether systematic reviews (SRs) or other types of studies with similar research questions and end-users' perspectives were cited to justify and design the trial. In addition, the discussion section were analyzed to evaluate whether trials placed the new result in the existing SRs to draw a conclusion. Multivariable logistic regression was used to find variables that associated with 3 aspects of EBR approach: (1) citing clinical studies for justification, (2) citing relevant studies that obtain the perspectives of end users, and (3) citing clinical studies for results discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 473 RCTs included, 45.67% (216) of the trials cited relevant similar studies, 21.56% (102) referenced to the studies that collected end-users' perspectives, and 10.99% (52) placed result in the context of the previous research. Few RCTs appropriately applied EBR approach. Among all the included studies, 3.17% (15) of the trials used SRs to inform study questions but none of them used updated SRs with acceptable quality; 1.05% (5) of the trials cited SRs of end-user's perspectives in the justification and design of the study, and only 1 trial added results in existing SR to draw a conclusion. Year of publication, language, funding, registration, ethical approval and number of sites were significantly associated with 1 of the 3 aspects of EBR approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few RCTs in acupuncture-related therapies for PD used the EBR approach to minimize research redundancy. Researchers, research institutes, funding agencies, ethics committees, journals and peer reviewers in acupuncture should make efforts to use and promote the EBR approach to ensure the value of new trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"551-558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-023-3711-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-023-3711-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价循证研究(EBR)方法在针灸治疗原发性痛经(PD)的随机对照试验(RCTs)中的应用。方法:检索2013年1月至2022年12月PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、中国国家知识基础设施、万方数据库、中国生物医学数据库和中国科技期刊数据库,检索针灸治疗帕金森病的rct。阅读每个RCT的全文和参考文献,以评估是否引用了系统评价(SRs)或具有类似研究问题和最终用户观点的其他类型的研究来证明和设计试验的合理性。此外,对讨论部分进行了分析,以评估试验是否将新的结果置于现有的SRs中以得出结论。使用多变量逻辑回归找到与EBR方法的3个方面相关的变量:(1)引用临床研究来证明,(2)引用获得最终用户观点的相关研究,(3)引用临床研究来讨论结果。结果:在纳入的473项随机对照试验中,45.67%(216项)的试验引用了相关的类似研究,21.56%(102项)的试验引用了收集最终用户观点的研究,10.99%(52项)的试验将结果置于先前研究的背景中。很少有随机对照试验恰当地应用了EBR方法。在所有纳入的研究中,3.17%(15)的试验使用SRs来告知研究问题,但没有一项试验使用质量可接受的更新SRs;1.05%(5)的试验在研究的论证和设计中引用了最终用户视角的SR,只有1项试验在现有SR中添加结果得出结论。出版年份、语言、经费、注册、伦理批准和站点数量与EBR方法的三个方面中的一个显著相关。结论:很少有针刺相关PD治疗的随机对照试验使用EBR方法来减少研究冗余。针灸领域的研究人员、研究机构、资助机构、伦理委员会、期刊和同行评审人员应该努力使用和推广EBR方法,以确保新试验的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Evidence-Based Research Approach in RCTs of Acupuncture-Related Therapies for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Meta-Research.

Objective: To assess the use of evidence-based research (EBR) approach in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture-related therapies for primary dysmenorrhea (PD).

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database were searched from January 2013 to December 2022 for RCTs of acupuncture on PD. The full text and references of each RCT were read to assess whether systematic reviews (SRs) or other types of studies with similar research questions and end-users' perspectives were cited to justify and design the trial. In addition, the discussion section were analyzed to evaluate whether trials placed the new result in the existing SRs to draw a conclusion. Multivariable logistic regression was used to find variables that associated with 3 aspects of EBR approach: (1) citing clinical studies for justification, (2) citing relevant studies that obtain the perspectives of end users, and (3) citing clinical studies for results discussion.

Results: Of 473 RCTs included, 45.67% (216) of the trials cited relevant similar studies, 21.56% (102) referenced to the studies that collected end-users' perspectives, and 10.99% (52) placed result in the context of the previous research. Few RCTs appropriately applied EBR approach. Among all the included studies, 3.17% (15) of the trials used SRs to inform study questions but none of them used updated SRs with acceptable quality; 1.05% (5) of the trials cited SRs of end-user's perspectives in the justification and design of the study, and only 1 trial added results in existing SR to draw a conclusion. Year of publication, language, funding, registration, ethical approval and number of sites were significantly associated with 1 of the 3 aspects of EBR approach.

Conclusions: Few RCTs in acupuncture-related therapies for PD used the EBR approach to minimize research redundancy. Researchers, research institutes, funding agencies, ethics committees, journals and peer reviewers in acupuncture should make efforts to use and promote the EBR approach to ensure the value of new trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
2413
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine seeks to promote international communication and exchange on integrative medicine as well as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and provide a rapid forum for the dissemination of scientific articles focusing on the latest developments and trends as well as experiences and achievements on integrative medicine or CAM in clinical practice, scientific research, education and healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信