南非产妇患者和提供者在电子时代对后续健康数据使用的偏好:一项定性研究。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Amnesty LeFevre, Olivia Welte, Kearabetswe Moopelo, Nicki Tiffin, Gaolatlhe Mothoagae, Nobukhosi Ncube, Nasiphi Gwiji, Manape Shogole, Amy L Slogrove, Nomakhawuta Moshani, Andrew Boulle, Jane Goudge, Frances Griffiths, Lee Fairlie, Ushma Mehta, Kerry Scott, Nirvana Pillay
{"title":"南非产妇患者和提供者在电子时代对后续健康数据使用的偏好:一项定性研究。","authors":"Amnesty LeFevre, Olivia Welte, Kearabetswe Moopelo, Nicki Tiffin, Gaolatlhe Mothoagae, Nobukhosi Ncube, Nasiphi Gwiji, Manape Shogole, Amy L Slogrove, Nomakhawuta Moshani, Andrew Boulle, Jane Goudge, Frances Griffiths, Lee Fairlie, Ushma Mehta, Kerry Scott, Nirvana Pillay","doi":"10.1080/26410397.2023.2274667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the expanding digitisation of individual health data, informed consent for the collection and use of health data is seldom explicitly sought in public sector clinics in South Africa. This study aims to identify perceptions of informed consent practices for health data capture, access, and use in Gauteng and the Western Cape provinces of South Africa. Data collection from September to December 2021 included in-depth interviews with healthcare providers (<i>n</i> = 12) and women (<i>n</i> = 62) attending maternity services. Study findings suggest that most patients were not aware that their data were being used for purposes beyond the individualised provision of medical care. Understanding the concept of anonymised use of electronic health data was at times challenging for patients who understood their data in the limited context of paper-based folders and booklets. When asked about preferences for electronic data, patients overwhelmingly were in favour of digitisation. They viewed electronic access to their health data as facilitating rapid and continuous access to health information. Patients were additionally asked about preferences, including delivery of health information, onward health data use, and recontacting. Understanding of these use cases varied and was often challenging to convey to participants who understood their health data in the context of information inputted into their paper folders. Future systems need to be established to collect informed consent for onward health data use. In light of perceived ties to the care received, these systems need to ensure that patient preferences do not impede the content nor quality of care received.</p>","PeriodicalId":37074,"journal":{"name":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences for onward health data use in the electronic age among maternity patients and providers in South Africa: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Amnesty LeFevre, Olivia Welte, Kearabetswe Moopelo, Nicki Tiffin, Gaolatlhe Mothoagae, Nobukhosi Ncube, Nasiphi Gwiji, Manape Shogole, Amy L Slogrove, Nomakhawuta Moshani, Andrew Boulle, Jane Goudge, Frances Griffiths, Lee Fairlie, Ushma Mehta, Kerry Scott, Nirvana Pillay\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26410397.2023.2274667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the expanding digitisation of individual health data, informed consent for the collection and use of health data is seldom explicitly sought in public sector clinics in South Africa. This study aims to identify perceptions of informed consent practices for health data capture, access, and use in Gauteng and the Western Cape provinces of South Africa. Data collection from September to December 2021 included in-depth interviews with healthcare providers (<i>n</i> = 12) and women (<i>n</i> = 62) attending maternity services. Study findings suggest that most patients were not aware that their data were being used for purposes beyond the individualised provision of medical care. Understanding the concept of anonymised use of electronic health data was at times challenging for patients who understood their data in the limited context of paper-based folders and booklets. When asked about preferences for electronic data, patients overwhelmingly were in favour of digitisation. They viewed electronic access to their health data as facilitating rapid and continuous access to health information. Patients were additionally asked about preferences, including delivery of health information, onward health data use, and recontacting. Understanding of these use cases varied and was often challenging to convey to participants who understood their health data in the context of information inputted into their paper folders. Future systems need to be established to collect informed consent for onward health data use. In light of perceived ties to the care received, these systems need to ensure that patient preferences do not impede the content nor quality of care received.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001361/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2023.2274667\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2023.2274667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管个人健康数据的数字化不断扩大,但南非公共部门诊所很少明确征求收集和使用健康数据的知情同意。本研究旨在确定对南非豪登省和西开普省卫生数据获取、获取和使用的知情同意做法的看法。2021年9月至12月的数据收集包括对医疗保健提供者(n = 12)和参加产科服务的妇女(n = 62)的深入访谈。研究结果表明,大多数患者并不知道他们的数据被用于提供个性化医疗服务以外的目的。理解匿名使用电子健康数据的概念有时对在纸质文件夹和小册子的有限背景下理解其数据的患者具有挑战性。当被问及对电子数据的偏好时,患者压倒性地支持数字化。他们认为以电子方式获取其卫生数据有助于快速和持续地获取卫生信息。此外,还询问了患者的偏好,包括提供健康信息、继续使用健康数据和再次联系。对这些用例的理解各不相同,而且往往很难向参与者传达,因为他们了解自己的健康数据是在输入到纸质文件夹中的信息背景下进行的。未来需要建立系统来收集知情同意,以便进一步使用卫生数据。考虑到与所接受护理的关系,这些系统需要确保患者的偏好不会影响所接受护理的内容和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preferences for onward health data use in the electronic age among maternity patients and providers in South Africa: a qualitative study.

Despite the expanding digitisation of individual health data, informed consent for the collection and use of health data is seldom explicitly sought in public sector clinics in South Africa. This study aims to identify perceptions of informed consent practices for health data capture, access, and use in Gauteng and the Western Cape provinces of South Africa. Data collection from September to December 2021 included in-depth interviews with healthcare providers (n = 12) and women (n = 62) attending maternity services. Study findings suggest that most patients were not aware that their data were being used for purposes beyond the individualised provision of medical care. Understanding the concept of anonymised use of electronic health data was at times challenging for patients who understood their data in the limited context of paper-based folders and booklets. When asked about preferences for electronic data, patients overwhelmingly were in favour of digitisation. They viewed electronic access to their health data as facilitating rapid and continuous access to health information. Patients were additionally asked about preferences, including delivery of health information, onward health data use, and recontacting. Understanding of these use cases varied and was often challenging to convey to participants who understood their health data in the context of information inputted into their paper folders. Future systems need to be established to collect informed consent for onward health data use. In light of perceived ties to the care received, these systems need to ensure that patient preferences do not impede the content nor quality of care received.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: SRHM is a multidisciplinary journal, welcoming submissions from a wide range of disciplines, including the social sciences and humanities, behavioural science, public health, human rights and law. The journal welcomes a range of methodological approaches, including qualitative and quantitative analyses such as policy analysis; mixed methods approaches to public health and health systems research; economic, political and historical analysis; and epidemiological work with a focus on SRHR. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based and other forms of interpersonal violence, young people, gender, sexuality, sexual rights and sexual pleasure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信