验证安全有效地使用神经康复系统(串联)来改善慢性中风人群的行走:可用性研究。

Q2 Medicine
Kirsten Elisabeth Smayda, Sarah Hodsdon Cooper, Katie Leyden, Jackie Ulaszek, Nicole Ferko, Annamaria Dobrin
{"title":"验证安全有效地使用神经康复系统(串联)来改善慢性中风人群的行走:可用性研究。","authors":"Kirsten Elisabeth Smayda, Sarah Hodsdon Cooper, Katie Leyden, Jackie Ulaszek, Nicole Ferko, Annamaria Dobrin","doi":"10.2196/50438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent walking impairment following a stroke is common. Although rehabilitative interventions exist, few exist for use at home in the chronic phase of stroke recovery. InTandem (MedRhythms, Inc) is a neurorehabilitation system intended to improve walking and community ambulation in adults with chronic stroke walking impairment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using design best practices and human factors engineering principles, the research presented here was conducted to validate the safe and effective use of InTandem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 15 participants in the chronic phase of stroke recovery (≥6 months after stroke) participated in this validation study. Participants were scored on 8 simulated use tasks, 4 knowledge assessments, and 7 comprehension assessments in a simulated home environment. The number and types of use errors, close calls, and operational difficulties were evaluated. Analyses of task performances, participant behaviors, and follow-up interviews were conducted to determine the root cause of use errors and difficulties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During this validation study, 93% (14/15) of participants were able to successfully complete the critical tasks associated with the simulated use of the InTandem system. Following simulated use task assessments, participants' knowledge and comprehension of the instructions for use and key safety information were evaluated. Overall, participants were able to find and correctly interpret information in the materials in order to answer the knowledge assessment questions. During the comprehension assessment, participants understood warning statements associated with critical tasks presented in the instructions for use. Across the entire study, 3 \"use errors\" and 1 \"success with difficulty\" were recorded. No adverse events, including slips, trips, or falls, occurred in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this validation study, people in the chronic phase of stroke recovery were able to safely and effectively use InTandem in the intended use environment. This validation study contributes to the overall understanding of residual use-related risks of InTandem in consideration of the established benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":36224,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","volume":"10 ","pages":"e50438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating the Safe and Effective Use of a Neurorehabilitation System (InTandem) to Improve Walking in the Chronic Stroke Population: Usability Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten Elisabeth Smayda, Sarah Hodsdon Cooper, Katie Leyden, Jackie Ulaszek, Nicole Ferko, Annamaria Dobrin\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/50438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent walking impairment following a stroke is common. Although rehabilitative interventions exist, few exist for use at home in the chronic phase of stroke recovery. InTandem (MedRhythms, Inc) is a neurorehabilitation system intended to improve walking and community ambulation in adults with chronic stroke walking impairment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using design best practices and human factors engineering principles, the research presented here was conducted to validate the safe and effective use of InTandem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 15 participants in the chronic phase of stroke recovery (≥6 months after stroke) participated in this validation study. Participants were scored on 8 simulated use tasks, 4 knowledge assessments, and 7 comprehension assessments in a simulated home environment. The number and types of use errors, close calls, and operational difficulties were evaluated. Analyses of task performances, participant behaviors, and follow-up interviews were conducted to determine the root cause of use errors and difficulties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During this validation study, 93% (14/15) of participants were able to successfully complete the critical tasks associated with the simulated use of the InTandem system. Following simulated use task assessments, participants' knowledge and comprehension of the instructions for use and key safety information were evaluated. Overall, participants were able to find and correctly interpret information in the materials in order to answer the knowledge assessment questions. During the comprehension assessment, participants understood warning statements associated with critical tasks presented in the instructions for use. Across the entire study, 3 \\\"use errors\\\" and 1 \\\"success with difficulty\\\" were recorded. No adverse events, including slips, trips, or falls, occurred in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this validation study, people in the chronic phase of stroke recovery were able to safely and effectively use InTandem in the intended use environment. This validation study contributes to the overall understanding of residual use-related risks of InTandem in consideration of the established benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"e50438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696501/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/50438\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/50438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卒中后持续性行走障碍很常见。虽然存在康复干预措施,但很少有在家中用于脑卒中慢性恢复期的干预措施。InTandem (MedRhythms, Inc)是一种神经康复系统,旨在改善慢性卒中步行障碍成人的步行和社区活动。目的:利用设计最佳实践和人为因素工程原理,进行研究以验证InTandem的安全有效使用。方法:共有15名脑卒中恢复慢性期(脑卒中后≥6个月)患者参与了本验证研究。参与者在模拟家庭环境中对8项模拟使用任务、4项知识评估和7项理解评估进行评分。评估了使用错误、近距离呼叫和操作困难的数量和类型。通过对任务绩效、参与者行为和后续访谈的分析来确定使用错误和困难的根本原因。结果:在这项验证研究中,93%(14/15)的参与者能够成功完成与模拟使用InTandem系统相关的关键任务。在模拟使用任务评估之后,评估了参与者对使用说明和关键安全信息的知识和理解。总体而言,为了回答知识评估问题,参与者能够找到并正确解释材料中的信息。在理解评估期间,参与者理解了使用说明中与关键任务相关的警告语句。在整个研究中,记录了3个“使用错误”和1个“困难成功”。本研究未发生滑倒、绊倒或跌倒等不良事件。结论:在这项验证性研究中,处于脑卒中恢复期的患者能够在预期的使用环境中安全有效地使用InTandem。该验证研究有助于全面了解InTandem的剩余使用相关风险,并考虑到已确定的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating the Safe and Effective Use of a Neurorehabilitation System (InTandem) to Improve Walking in the Chronic Stroke Population: Usability Study.

Background: Persistent walking impairment following a stroke is common. Although rehabilitative interventions exist, few exist for use at home in the chronic phase of stroke recovery. InTandem (MedRhythms, Inc) is a neurorehabilitation system intended to improve walking and community ambulation in adults with chronic stroke walking impairment.

Objective: Using design best practices and human factors engineering principles, the research presented here was conducted to validate the safe and effective use of InTandem.

Methods: In total, 15 participants in the chronic phase of stroke recovery (≥6 months after stroke) participated in this validation study. Participants were scored on 8 simulated use tasks, 4 knowledge assessments, and 7 comprehension assessments in a simulated home environment. The number and types of use errors, close calls, and operational difficulties were evaluated. Analyses of task performances, participant behaviors, and follow-up interviews were conducted to determine the root cause of use errors and difficulties.

Results: During this validation study, 93% (14/15) of participants were able to successfully complete the critical tasks associated with the simulated use of the InTandem system. Following simulated use task assessments, participants' knowledge and comprehension of the instructions for use and key safety information were evaluated. Overall, participants were able to find and correctly interpret information in the materials in order to answer the knowledge assessment questions. During the comprehension assessment, participants understood warning statements associated with critical tasks presented in the instructions for use. Across the entire study, 3 "use errors" and 1 "success with difficulty" were recorded. No adverse events, including slips, trips, or falls, occurred in this study.

Conclusions: In this validation study, people in the chronic phase of stroke recovery were able to safely and effectively use InTandem in the intended use environment. This validation study contributes to the overall understanding of residual use-related risks of InTandem in consideration of the established benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信