寰枢外侧关节内固定术缓解颈部疼痛和颈源性头痛。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnad153
Richard D Ferch, Tyson Zhang, Nikolai Bogduk
{"title":"寰枢外侧关节内固定术缓解颈部疼痛和颈源性头痛。","authors":"Richard D Ferch, Tyson Zhang, Nikolai Bogduk","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnad153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthrosis of the lateral atlanto-axial joint (LAAJ) may be a cause of upper neck pain and headache. Intra-articular injection of steroids may provide only short-lasting relief. For intractable pain, arthrodesis of the joint might be considered.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the success rates of arthrodesis of the lateral atlanto-axial joint for relieving neck pain and disability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Practice audit.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private practice of senior author.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Prospective series of 23 consecutive patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outcomes were measured using a numerical rating scale for neck pain, and the Neck Disability Index for disability. Success rates were calculated for various degrees of improvement of neck pain at long-term follow-up (8-40 months), and for achieving various combinations of improvement of both neck pain and disability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete relief of pain was achieved in 40% of patients, with a further 40% achieving at least 50% relief. At long-term follow-up, 30% of patients had no neck pain and no disability, and a further 25% had only minimal pain, minimal disability, or both.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study did not corroborate earlier studies that claimed outstanding outcomes for arthrodesis of the LAAJ, but its outcomes are consonant with more recent studies that provided transparent outcome data. These studies provide Pain Physicians with empirical data on success rates and outcomes, upon which they can base their consideration of referral for arthrodesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10906710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Athrodesis of the lateral atlanto-axial joint for the relief of neck pain and cervicogenic headache.\",\"authors\":\"Richard D Ferch, Tyson Zhang, Nikolai Bogduk\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pm/pnad153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthrosis of the lateral atlanto-axial joint (LAAJ) may be a cause of upper neck pain and headache. Intra-articular injection of steroids may provide only short-lasting relief. For intractable pain, arthrodesis of the joint might be considered.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the success rates of arthrodesis of the lateral atlanto-axial joint for relieving neck pain and disability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Practice audit.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private practice of senior author.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Prospective series of 23 consecutive patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outcomes were measured using a numerical rating scale for neck pain, and the Neck Disability Index for disability. Success rates were calculated for various degrees of improvement of neck pain at long-term follow-up (8-40 months), and for achieving various combinations of improvement of both neck pain and disability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete relief of pain was achieved in 40% of patients, with a further 40% achieving at least 50% relief. At long-term follow-up, 30% of patients had no neck pain and no disability, and a further 25% had only minimal pain, minimal disability, or both.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study did not corroborate earlier studies that claimed outstanding outcomes for arthrodesis of the LAAJ, but its outcomes are consonant with more recent studies that provided transparent outcome data. These studies provide Pain Physicians with empirical data on success rates and outcomes, upon which they can base their consideration of referral for arthrodesis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10906710/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnad153\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnad153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:寰枢外侧关节骨关节病(LAAJ)可能是引起上颈部疼痛和头痛的原因。关节内注射类固醇可能只能提供短期的缓解。对于顽固性疼痛,可以考虑关节融合术。目的:探讨寰枢外侧关节融合术治疗颈部疼痛和残疾的成功率。设计:实践审核。背景:资深作家私人执业。受试者:前瞻性连续23例患者。方法:使用颈部疼痛的数值评定量表和颈部残疾指数来测量结果。在长期随访(8-40个月)中计算不同程度颈部疼痛改善的成功率,以及实现颈部疼痛和残疾改善的各种组合的成功率。结果:40%的患者疼痛完全缓解,另外40%的患者疼痛至少缓解50%。在长期随访中,30%的患者没有颈部疼痛和残疾,另外25%的患者只有轻微疼痛、轻微残疾或两者兼而有之。结论:目前的研究并没有证实早期的研究声称LAAJ关节融合术的显著结果,但其结果与最近提供透明结果数据的研究一致。这些研究为疼痛医生提供了成功率和结果的经验数据,他们可以根据这些数据考虑关节融合术的转诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Athrodesis of the lateral atlanto-axial joint for the relief of neck pain and cervicogenic headache.

Background: Osteoarthrosis of the lateral atlanto-axial joint (LAAJ) may be a cause of upper neck pain and headache. Intra-articular injection of steroids may provide only short-lasting relief. For intractable pain, arthrodesis of the joint might be considered.

Objective: To determine the success rates of arthrodesis of the lateral atlanto-axial joint for relieving neck pain and disability.

Design: Practice audit.

Setting: Private practice of senior author.

Subjects: Prospective series of 23 consecutive patients.

Methods: Outcomes were measured using a numerical rating scale for neck pain, and the Neck Disability Index for disability. Success rates were calculated for various degrees of improvement of neck pain at long-term follow-up (8-40 months), and for achieving various combinations of improvement of both neck pain and disability.

Results: Complete relief of pain was achieved in 40% of patients, with a further 40% achieving at least 50% relief. At long-term follow-up, 30% of patients had no neck pain and no disability, and a further 25% had only minimal pain, minimal disability, or both.

Conclusions: The present study did not corroborate earlier studies that claimed outstanding outcomes for arthrodesis of the LAAJ, but its outcomes are consonant with more recent studies that provided transparent outcome data. These studies provide Pain Physicians with empirical data on success rates and outcomes, upon which they can base their consideration of referral for arthrodesis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信