从急症医院获得住院护理:我们能更有效率吗?

Craig Whitehead FRACP, Rachel Wundke RN, Lou Williamson BN, Paul Finucane FRACP
{"title":"从急症医院获得住院护理:我们能更有效率吗?","authors":"Craig Whitehead FRACP,&nbsp;Rachel Wundke RN,&nbsp;Lou Williamson BN,&nbsp;Paul Finucane FRACP","doi":"10.1111/j.1440-1762.2001.00394.pp.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> Hospitalized patients who require admission to residential care are often thought to make prolonged and inappropriate use of hospital resources. There are no Australian data on the factors that contribute to length of hospital stay for such patients. The aim of this study was to determine the timing of critical steps in discharge planning for hospitalized patients who need residential care. We prospectively audited 100 consecutive referrals to an Aged Care Assessment Team (ACAT) from one acute hospital in South Australia. Case notes were examined to determine the timings of critical events in discharge planning. We found 47% of patients were discharged to a nursing home, 16% to a hostel, 11% died, 10% returned home and 16% went to another facility. The average length of hospital stay was 27.2 days, and an average of 8.4 days elapsed before a decision to seek residential care was first recorded. A further 4.5 days elapsed before ACAT referral, 4.6 days before ACAT approval and 9.7 days before a residential care bed became available. We conclude that people admitted to our hospital from the community and who subsequently need residential care, spend 36% of their stay awaiting a residential care bed. Most of their hospital stay has elapsed before residential care is considered necessary and referral and approval processes have been activated. Strategies to reduce length of stay should perhaps focus on the earlier recognition of the need for residential care and accelerated referral and assessment processes. Earlier involvement by social work and occupational therapy should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"21 1-2","pages":"9-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1440-1762.2001.00394.pp.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accessing residential care from an acute hospital: Can we be more efficient?\",\"authors\":\"Craig Whitehead FRACP,&nbsp;Rachel Wundke RN,&nbsp;Lou Williamson BN,&nbsp;Paul Finucane FRACP\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1440-1762.2001.00394.pp.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <b>Abstract</b> Hospitalized patients who require admission to residential care are often thought to make prolonged and inappropriate use of hospital resources. There are no Australian data on the factors that contribute to length of hospital stay for such patients. The aim of this study was to determine the timing of critical steps in discharge planning for hospitalized patients who need residential care. We prospectively audited 100 consecutive referrals to an Aged Care Assessment Team (ACAT) from one acute hospital in South Australia. Case notes were examined to determine the timings of critical events in discharge planning. We found 47% of patients were discharged to a nursing home, 16% to a hostel, 11% died, 10% returned home and 16% went to another facility. The average length of hospital stay was 27.2 days, and an average of 8.4 days elapsed before a decision to seek residential care was first recorded. A further 4.5 days elapsed before ACAT referral, 4.6 days before ACAT approval and 9.7 days before a residential care bed became available. We conclude that people admitted to our hospital from the community and who subsequently need residential care, spend 36% of their stay awaiting a residential care bed. Most of their hospital stay has elapsed before residential care is considered necessary and referral and approval processes have been activated. Strategies to reduce length of stay should perhaps focus on the earlier recognition of the need for residential care and accelerated referral and assessment processes. Earlier involvement by social work and occupational therapy should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of quality in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"21 1-2\",\"pages\":\"9-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1440-1762.2001.00394.pp.x\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of quality in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1440-1762.2001.00394.pp.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1440-1762.2001.00394.pp.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

需要住院的住院患者通常被认为是长期和不适当地使用医院资源。澳大利亚没有关于影响这类病人住院时间长短的因素的数据。本研究的目的是确定需要住院护理的住院患者出院计划中关键步骤的时机。我们前瞻性审计100连续转介到老年护理评估小组(ACAT)从一家急性医院在南澳大利亚。检查病例记录以确定出院计划中关键事件的时间安排。我们发现47%的病人出院后去了养老院,16%去了招待所,11%死亡,10%回家,16%去了其他机构。平均住院时间为27.2天,平均8.4天之后才决定寻求住院治疗。再过4.5天ACAT转诊,4.6天ACAT批准,9.7天住院护理床位可用。我们得出的结论是,从社区进入我们医院并随后需要住宿护理的人,花费36%的住院时间等待住宿护理床。他们的大部分住院时间已过,才被认为需要住院治疗,并启动了转诊和批准程序。减少住院时间的战略也许应侧重于尽早认识到需要住院护理和加快转诊和评估进程。应考虑社会工作和职业治疗的早期介入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accessing residential care from an acute hospital: Can we be more efficient?

Abstract Hospitalized patients who require admission to residential care are often thought to make prolonged and inappropriate use of hospital resources. There are no Australian data on the factors that contribute to length of hospital stay for such patients. The aim of this study was to determine the timing of critical steps in discharge planning for hospitalized patients who need residential care. We prospectively audited 100 consecutive referrals to an Aged Care Assessment Team (ACAT) from one acute hospital in South Australia. Case notes were examined to determine the timings of critical events in discharge planning. We found 47% of patients were discharged to a nursing home, 16% to a hostel, 11% died, 10% returned home and 16% went to another facility. The average length of hospital stay was 27.2 days, and an average of 8.4 days elapsed before a decision to seek residential care was first recorded. A further 4.5 days elapsed before ACAT referral, 4.6 days before ACAT approval and 9.7 days before a residential care bed became available. We conclude that people admitted to our hospital from the community and who subsequently need residential care, spend 36% of their stay awaiting a residential care bed. Most of their hospital stay has elapsed before residential care is considered necessary and referral and approval processes have been activated. Strategies to reduce length of stay should perhaps focus on the earlier recognition of the need for residential care and accelerated referral and assessment processes. Earlier involvement by social work and occupational therapy should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信