电生物阻抗测定心输出量。

Health technology assessment reports Pub Date : 1989-01-01
H Handelsman
{"title":"电生物阻抗测定心输出量。","authors":"H Handelsman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous CO measurement by EB is a highly technical issue requiring expert opinion for evaluation. At present, the NIH, American Society of Anesthesiologists, and the American College of Cardiology consider continuous CO monitoring by EB to be investigational. However, EB has numerous advantages when compared with other presently available techniques. Consequently, advances may require that the OHTA conduct another assessment in the near future. The NIH suggested that the use of EB on a noncontinuous basis in selected patients to measure changes in CO (but not the absolute value of CO) is reasonable. If the use of EB on a continuous basis is contemplated, then studies should be conducted to determine the safety of long-term electrical input into the thorax. Electrical bioimpedance should not be used in patients with pacemakers and may be inappropriate in patients with regurgitant valvular heart disease, intracardiac shunts, arrhythmias, ventricular asynchrony, tachycardia, hypertension, significant airway obstruction, or in patients undergoing therapy such as atropinization, all of which may change the shape of the dZ/dt waveform.</p>","PeriodicalId":77156,"journal":{"name":"Health technology assessment reports","volume":" 3","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac output by electrical bioimpedance.\",\"authors\":\"H Handelsman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Continuous CO measurement by EB is a highly technical issue requiring expert opinion for evaluation. At present, the NIH, American Society of Anesthesiologists, and the American College of Cardiology consider continuous CO monitoring by EB to be investigational. However, EB has numerous advantages when compared with other presently available techniques. Consequently, advances may require that the OHTA conduct another assessment in the near future. The NIH suggested that the use of EB on a noncontinuous basis in selected patients to measure changes in CO (but not the absolute value of CO) is reasonable. If the use of EB on a continuous basis is contemplated, then studies should be conducted to determine the safety of long-term electrical input into the thorax. Electrical bioimpedance should not be used in patients with pacemakers and may be inappropriate in patients with regurgitant valvular heart disease, intracardiac shunts, arrhythmias, ventricular asynchrony, tachycardia, hypertension, significant airway obstruction, or in patients undergoing therapy such as atropinization, all of which may change the shape of the dZ/dt waveform.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health technology assessment reports\",\"volume\":\" 3\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health technology assessment reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health technology assessment reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用EB连续测量CO是一个高度技术性的问题,需要专家意见进行评估。目前,美国国立卫生研究院、美国麻醉师学会和美国心脏病学会认为,通过EB进行连续CO监测是一种研究。然而,与目前可用的其他技术相比,EB具有许多优点。因此,进展可能要求OHTA在不久的将来进行另一次评估。美国国立卫生研究院建议,在选定的患者中使用非连续的EB来测量CO的变化(但不是CO的绝对值)是合理的。如果考虑持续使用EB,则应进行研究以确定长期电输入胸腔的安全性。电生物阻抗不应用于装有起搏器的患者,也不适用于有反流性瓣膜性心脏病、心内分流、心律失常、室性不同步、心动过速、高血压、明显气道阻塞或正在接受阿托品化等治疗的患者,所有这些患者都可能改变dZ/dt波形的形状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiac output by electrical bioimpedance.

Continuous CO measurement by EB is a highly technical issue requiring expert opinion for evaluation. At present, the NIH, American Society of Anesthesiologists, and the American College of Cardiology consider continuous CO monitoring by EB to be investigational. However, EB has numerous advantages when compared with other presently available techniques. Consequently, advances may require that the OHTA conduct another assessment in the near future. The NIH suggested that the use of EB on a noncontinuous basis in selected patients to measure changes in CO (but not the absolute value of CO) is reasonable. If the use of EB on a continuous basis is contemplated, then studies should be conducted to determine the safety of long-term electrical input into the thorax. Electrical bioimpedance should not be used in patients with pacemakers and may be inappropriate in patients with regurgitant valvular heart disease, intracardiac shunts, arrhythmias, ventricular asynchrony, tachycardia, hypertension, significant airway obstruction, or in patients undergoing therapy such as atropinization, all of which may change the shape of the dZ/dt waveform.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信