特刊:学习与工作的未来:关注能力如何支持公平的经济复苏

Stacey Clawson PhD
{"title":"特刊:学习与工作的未来:关注能力如何支持公平的经济复苏","authors":"Stacey Clawson PhD","doi":"10.1002/cbe2.1243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As editors, we had excellent reasons to create a special edition on the future of learning and work long before the COVID-19 pandemic swept across the world, leading to massive levels of death and unemployment that has unproportionally impacted Black, Latinx, and people of color.</p><p>As this introduction is written, the rationale seems even more compelling for a special issue focused on the role of competencies in workforce and economic recovery. The pandemic’s impact on society has revealed fissures in all of our social systems, but education stands out as especially fragile. In spite of monumental efforts toward improvement in the past several decades, our education infrastructure is simply not providing equitable, workforce-aligned, student-centered learning for too many of our Black, Latinx, people of color, and low-income students and workers. Many of us knew all about this failing before COVID-19, but now the awareness has spread to every household, school, occupation, and community.</p><p>As tragic as the onset of the virus has been, educators would be remiss if we did not take this opportunity to advocate for dramatic improvement. Unfortunately, social system transformation rarely happens in good times; usually when the old ways clearly become dysfunctional are people willing to consider alternatives.</p><p>The alternatives are there and have been for many years: Competency-based education (CBE) offers a path to better, more fair pedagogy and careers with value for more learners—but only if educators and employers come together to implement them.</p><p>Several common themes are interwoven throughout the issue. Assessing the pandemic’s impact is, of course, necessary and unavoidable. It is a unique historical event in which the entire world has been simultaneously affected. However, it is also a familiar story in that different populations have suffered in unequal ways. Linked to this fact, and not surprisingly, a concern for equity presents itself in almost every article. The uneven impact of COVID-19 has illuminated class and racial divides that can no longer be ignored. Unlike the virus, equity has been all too easy to overlook for many with more privileged race and economic backgrounds. Now, however, it shouts for attention.</p><p>A long-standing challenge makes yet another appearance in these pages: Close collaboration between educators and employers emerges as perhaps the missing piece of the entire puzzle. We must create clearly defined pathways from the classroom to the workplace (in person or virtual), and learners must know how to follow them to a job or career.</p><p>Educators can “buy into” the CBE mindset and make dramatic changes in their programs, but if there are no good jobs at the “end of that rainbow,” the whole effort, time, and expense will be for naught. Learners and workers who are already in despair over their situations will grow ever more cynical about the system’s concern (or lack thereof) for them.</p><p>Finally, there is the big question: If these alternatives have been available all along, why have they not been implemented on a much wider scale? Is it only the lack of a crisis that has hindered development? The foundational document in this issue, from Clawson and Girardi of Jobs for the Future, argues that there is another variable: the lack of a sustained national commitment to competency-based, equity-centered education (CBEE).</p><p>In calling for such a commitment, JFF reflects that the United States has been able to achieve great things when we have worked toward a unifying goal as a country. What could be more appropriate for a new administration whose president’s inaugural address focused on unity? Of course, if the recommendations of all our authors were followed, it would go far in meeting the crisis outlined here. However, these initiatives will remain incremental until a national framework boosts a cohesive movement that captures the strengths of each one of them and many others. Synergies among the various efforts could result in innovations we cannot, at this time, predict.</p><p>Policy is outside the scope of our compilation, but we can hope that education, business, and economic advocates of the Biden administration might turn their attention to the issues we have raised here. Perhaps, with an educator as First Lady, it may be possible that a national commitment to CBE would become this generation’s “moonshot.” We certainly hope so.</p><p>For now, I would like to thank our authors for contributing their attention to these important issues during a challenging time for families and communities. I also extend my appreciation to the Associate Editors for their gift of time and talent in helping create a quality special issue: Richard Barnes, Ashley Bliss-Lima, Allen C. Clarkson, Alton James, and Dr. Mara Lockowandt.</p>","PeriodicalId":101234,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1243","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special issue: The future of learning & work: How focusing on competencies will support equitable economy recovery\",\"authors\":\"Stacey Clawson PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cbe2.1243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As editors, we had excellent reasons to create a special edition on the future of learning and work long before the COVID-19 pandemic swept across the world, leading to massive levels of death and unemployment that has unproportionally impacted Black, Latinx, and people of color.</p><p>As this introduction is written, the rationale seems even more compelling for a special issue focused on the role of competencies in workforce and economic recovery. The pandemic’s impact on society has revealed fissures in all of our social systems, but education stands out as especially fragile. In spite of monumental efforts toward improvement in the past several decades, our education infrastructure is simply not providing equitable, workforce-aligned, student-centered learning for too many of our Black, Latinx, people of color, and low-income students and workers. Many of us knew all about this failing before COVID-19, but now the awareness has spread to every household, school, occupation, and community.</p><p>As tragic as the onset of the virus has been, educators would be remiss if we did not take this opportunity to advocate for dramatic improvement. Unfortunately, social system transformation rarely happens in good times; usually when the old ways clearly become dysfunctional are people willing to consider alternatives.</p><p>The alternatives are there and have been for many years: Competency-based education (CBE) offers a path to better, more fair pedagogy and careers with value for more learners—but only if educators and employers come together to implement them.</p><p>Several common themes are interwoven throughout the issue. Assessing the pandemic’s impact is, of course, necessary and unavoidable. It is a unique historical event in which the entire world has been simultaneously affected. However, it is also a familiar story in that different populations have suffered in unequal ways. Linked to this fact, and not surprisingly, a concern for equity presents itself in almost every article. The uneven impact of COVID-19 has illuminated class and racial divides that can no longer be ignored. Unlike the virus, equity has been all too easy to overlook for many with more privileged race and economic backgrounds. Now, however, it shouts for attention.</p><p>A long-standing challenge makes yet another appearance in these pages: Close collaboration between educators and employers emerges as perhaps the missing piece of the entire puzzle. We must create clearly defined pathways from the classroom to the workplace (in person or virtual), and learners must know how to follow them to a job or career.</p><p>Educators can “buy into” the CBE mindset and make dramatic changes in their programs, but if there are no good jobs at the “end of that rainbow,” the whole effort, time, and expense will be for naught. Learners and workers who are already in despair over their situations will grow ever more cynical about the system’s concern (or lack thereof) for them.</p><p>Finally, there is the big question: If these alternatives have been available all along, why have they not been implemented on a much wider scale? Is it only the lack of a crisis that has hindered development? The foundational document in this issue, from Clawson and Girardi of Jobs for the Future, argues that there is another variable: the lack of a sustained national commitment to competency-based, equity-centered education (CBEE).</p><p>In calling for such a commitment, JFF reflects that the United States has been able to achieve great things when we have worked toward a unifying goal as a country. What could be more appropriate for a new administration whose president’s inaugural address focused on unity? Of course, if the recommendations of all our authors were followed, it would go far in meeting the crisis outlined here. However, these initiatives will remain incremental until a national framework boosts a cohesive movement that captures the strengths of each one of them and many others. Synergies among the various efforts could result in innovations we cannot, at this time, predict.</p><p>Policy is outside the scope of our compilation, but we can hope that education, business, and economic advocates of the Biden administration might turn their attention to the issues we have raised here. Perhaps, with an educator as First Lady, it may be possible that a national commitment to CBE would become this generation’s “moonshot.” We certainly hope so.</p><p>For now, I would like to thank our authors for contributing their attention to these important issues during a challenging time for families and communities. I also extend my appreciation to the Associate Editors for their gift of time and talent in helping create a quality special issue: Richard Barnes, Ashley Bliss-Lima, Allen C. Clarkson, Alton James, and Dr. Mara Lockowandt.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1243\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为编辑,早在COVID-19大流行席卷全球之前,我们就有充分的理由创建一个关于学习和工作未来的特别版,这一大流行导致大量死亡和失业,对黑人、拉丁裔和有色人种造成了不成比例的影响。在撰写这篇导言时,其理论基础似乎更有说服力,更适合专门讨论胜任力在劳动力和经济复苏中的作用。这一大流行病对社会的影响暴露了我们所有社会制度的裂痕,但教育尤其脆弱。尽管在过去的几十年里,我们为改善教育做出了巨大的努力,但我们的教育基础设施并没有为太多的黑人、拉丁裔、有色人种、低收入学生和工人提供公平的、以劳动力为导向的、以学生为中心的学习。我们中的许多人在COVID-19之前就知道这一点,但现在这种意识已经传播到每个家庭、学校、职业和社区。尽管这种病毒的爆发是悲剧性的,但如果我们不利用这个机会倡导大幅改善,教育工作者将是失职的。不幸的是,社会制度转型很少在经济繁荣时期发生;通常,当旧的方式明显变得不正常时,人们会愿意考虑替代方案。替代方案已经存在多年了:能力本位教育(CBE)为更多的学习者提供了一条通往更好、更公平的教学方法和职业的道路,但前提是教育者和雇主共同实施。几个共同的主题交织在整个问题中。当然,评估大流行的影响是必要和不可避免的。这是一个独特的历史事件,整个世界同时受到影响。然而,这也是一个熟悉的故事,不同的人口遭受不平等的方式。毫不奇怪,与这一事实相联系的是,几乎每篇文章都关注公平。COVID-19的不平衡影响揭示了不能再忽视的阶级和种族分歧。与病毒不同,对于许多拥有更优越种族和经济背景的人来说,公平太容易被忽视了。然而,现在,它却需要引起人们的注意。一个长期存在的挑战再次出现在这些页面上:教育工作者和雇主之间的密切合作可能是整个拼图中缺失的一块。我们必须创建从教室到工作场所(无论是面对面还是虚拟)的明确路径,学习者必须知道如何遵循这些路径找到一份工作或职业。教育工作者可以“接受”CBE的心态,并对他们的课程做出巨大的改变,但如果在“彩虹的尽头”没有好的工作,那么所有的努力、时间和费用都将付诸东流。已经对自己的处境感到绝望的学习者和工人,会对教育系统对他们的关心(或缺乏关心)变得越来越愤世嫉俗。最后,还有一个大问题:如果这些替代方案一直可用,为什么它们没有在更广泛的范围内实施?仅仅是缺乏危机阻碍了发展吗?克劳森和吉拉迪在《未来的工作》一书中提出了这一问题的基础文件,认为还有另一个变量:缺乏对以能力为基础、以公平为中心的教育(CBEE)的持续的国家承诺。通过呼吁这样的承诺,JFF反映出,当我们作为一个国家朝着一个统一的目标努力时,美国已经能够取得伟大的成就。对于一个总统就职演说强调团结的新政府来说,还有什么比这更合适呢?当然,如果我们所有作者的建议都被采纳,它将大大有助于应对这里概述的危机。然而,这些举措将继续是渐进式的,直到一个国家框架推动一个凝聚运动,抓住每一个倡议和许多其他倡议的优势。各种努力之间的协同作用可能产生我们目前无法预测的创新。政策不在我们的汇编范围之内,但我们可以希望拜登政府的教育、商业和经济倡导者可能会把注意力转向我们在这里提出的问题。也许,有一位教育家作为第一夫人,对CBE的全国性承诺可能会成为这一代人的“登月计划”。我们当然希望如此。现在,我要感谢我们的作者在家庭和社区面临挑战的时期对这些重要问题的关注。我还要感谢副编辑们,感谢他们花时间和才华,帮助制作了这期高质量的特刊:理查德·巴恩斯、阿什利·布利斯-利马、艾伦·c·克拉克森、奥尔顿·詹姆斯和玛拉·洛克万特博士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Special issue: The future of learning & work: How focusing on competencies will support equitable economy recovery

As editors, we had excellent reasons to create a special edition on the future of learning and work long before the COVID-19 pandemic swept across the world, leading to massive levels of death and unemployment that has unproportionally impacted Black, Latinx, and people of color.

As this introduction is written, the rationale seems even more compelling for a special issue focused on the role of competencies in workforce and economic recovery. The pandemic’s impact on society has revealed fissures in all of our social systems, but education stands out as especially fragile. In spite of monumental efforts toward improvement in the past several decades, our education infrastructure is simply not providing equitable, workforce-aligned, student-centered learning for too many of our Black, Latinx, people of color, and low-income students and workers. Many of us knew all about this failing before COVID-19, but now the awareness has spread to every household, school, occupation, and community.

As tragic as the onset of the virus has been, educators would be remiss if we did not take this opportunity to advocate for dramatic improvement. Unfortunately, social system transformation rarely happens in good times; usually when the old ways clearly become dysfunctional are people willing to consider alternatives.

The alternatives are there and have been for many years: Competency-based education (CBE) offers a path to better, more fair pedagogy and careers with value for more learners—but only if educators and employers come together to implement them.

Several common themes are interwoven throughout the issue. Assessing the pandemic’s impact is, of course, necessary and unavoidable. It is a unique historical event in which the entire world has been simultaneously affected. However, it is also a familiar story in that different populations have suffered in unequal ways. Linked to this fact, and not surprisingly, a concern for equity presents itself in almost every article. The uneven impact of COVID-19 has illuminated class and racial divides that can no longer be ignored. Unlike the virus, equity has been all too easy to overlook for many with more privileged race and economic backgrounds. Now, however, it shouts for attention.

A long-standing challenge makes yet another appearance in these pages: Close collaboration between educators and employers emerges as perhaps the missing piece of the entire puzzle. We must create clearly defined pathways from the classroom to the workplace (in person or virtual), and learners must know how to follow them to a job or career.

Educators can “buy into” the CBE mindset and make dramatic changes in their programs, but if there are no good jobs at the “end of that rainbow,” the whole effort, time, and expense will be for naught. Learners and workers who are already in despair over their situations will grow ever more cynical about the system’s concern (or lack thereof) for them.

Finally, there is the big question: If these alternatives have been available all along, why have they not been implemented on a much wider scale? Is it only the lack of a crisis that has hindered development? The foundational document in this issue, from Clawson and Girardi of Jobs for the Future, argues that there is another variable: the lack of a sustained national commitment to competency-based, equity-centered education (CBEE).

In calling for such a commitment, JFF reflects that the United States has been able to achieve great things when we have worked toward a unifying goal as a country. What could be more appropriate for a new administration whose president’s inaugural address focused on unity? Of course, if the recommendations of all our authors were followed, it would go far in meeting the crisis outlined here. However, these initiatives will remain incremental until a national framework boosts a cohesive movement that captures the strengths of each one of them and many others. Synergies among the various efforts could result in innovations we cannot, at this time, predict.

Policy is outside the scope of our compilation, but we can hope that education, business, and economic advocates of the Biden administration might turn their attention to the issues we have raised here. Perhaps, with an educator as First Lady, it may be possible that a national commitment to CBE would become this generation’s “moonshot.” We certainly hope so.

For now, I would like to thank our authors for contributing their attention to these important issues during a challenging time for families and communities. I also extend my appreciation to the Associate Editors for their gift of time and talent in helping create a quality special issue: Richard Barnes, Ashley Bliss-Lima, Allen C. Clarkson, Alton James, and Dr. Mara Lockowandt.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信