以“MIC”为例:质疑欧盟建立投资条约法院的理由

Manuel P. Barrocas
{"title":"以“MIC”为例:质疑欧盟建立投资条约法院的理由","authors":"Manuel P. Barrocas","doi":"10.1002/alt.21948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The European Union Commission (EC), after the 2009 entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty (available at https://bit.ly/34TUxpu) updating the European Union, acquired a new competence in the foreign investment field among other areas of law.</p>","PeriodicalId":100074,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","volume":"40 5","pages":"75-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking the ‘MIC’: Questioning the European Union Rationale for Establishing an Investment Treaties Court\",\"authors\":\"Manuel P. Barrocas\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alt.21948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The European Union Commission (EC), after the 2009 entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty (available at https://bit.ly/34TUxpu) updating the European Union, acquired a new competence in the foreign investment field among other areas of law.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"75-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.21948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.21948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟委员会(EC)在更新欧盟的《里斯本条约》(网址:https://bit.ly/34TUxpu)于2009年生效后,在其他法律领域中获得了外国投资领域的新权限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taking the ‘MIC’: Questioning the European Union Rationale for Establishing an Investment Treaties Court

The European Union Commission (EC), after the 2009 entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty (available at https://bit.ly/34TUxpu) updating the European Union, acquired a new competence in the foreign investment field among other areas of law.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信