永远不要假设你的客户知道调解和仲裁

Kristen M. Blankley, Ashley M. Votruba, Logen M. Bartz, Lisa M. Pytlikzillig
{"title":"永远不要假设你的客户知道调解和仲裁","authors":"Kristen M. Blankley,&nbsp;Ashley M. Votruba,&nbsp;Logen M. Bartz,&nbsp;Lisa M. Pytlikzillig","doi":"10.1002/alt.21946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The alternative dispute resolution revolution is certainly present in the U.S legal system. Many legal disputes are subject to mandatory mediation, whether by contract, statute, court rule, or court order. See, e.g., Ben Barlow, “Divorce Child Custody Mediation: In Order to Form a More Perfect Disunion?” 52 <i>Cle. St. L. Rev.</i> 499, (2004-2005) (discussing mandatory mediation in the context of family cases); Michael Z. Green, “Proposing a New Paradigm for EEOC Enforcement after 35 Years: Outsourcing Charge Processing by Mandatory Mediation,” 105 <i>Dick. L. Rev.</i> 305 (2001) (discussing mandatory mediation of employment claims).</p>","PeriodicalId":100074,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","volume":"40 5","pages":"73-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Never Assume What Your Clients Know About Mediation and Arbitration\",\"authors\":\"Kristen M. Blankley,&nbsp;Ashley M. Votruba,&nbsp;Logen M. Bartz,&nbsp;Lisa M. Pytlikzillig\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alt.21946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The alternative dispute resolution revolution is certainly present in the U.S legal system. Many legal disputes are subject to mandatory mediation, whether by contract, statute, court rule, or court order. See, e.g., Ben Barlow, “Divorce Child Custody Mediation: In Order to Form a More Perfect Disunion?” 52 <i>Cle. St. L. Rev.</i> 499, (2004-2005) (discussing mandatory mediation in the context of family cases); Michael Z. Green, “Proposing a New Paradigm for EEOC Enforcement after 35 Years: Outsourcing Charge Processing by Mandatory Mediation,” 105 <i>Dick. L. Rev.</i> 305 (2001) (discussing mandatory mediation of employment claims).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"73-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.21946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.21946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

替代性争议解决革命确实存在于美国的法律体系中。许多法律纠纷都需要强制性调解,无论是通过合同、法规、法院规则还是法院命令。参见,例如,本·巴洛,“离婚子女监护权调解:为了形成一个更完美的分手?52节。St. L. Rev. 499,(2004-2005)(讨论家庭案件背景下的强制调解);Michael Z. Green,“35年后平等就业机会执行的新范式:通过强制调解外包收费处理”,第105卷。L. Rev. 305(2001)(讨论雇佣索赔的强制性调解)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Never Assume What Your Clients Know About Mediation and Arbitration

The alternative dispute resolution revolution is certainly present in the U.S legal system. Many legal disputes are subject to mandatory mediation, whether by contract, statute, court rule, or court order. See, e.g., Ben Barlow, “Divorce Child Custody Mediation: In Order to Form a More Perfect Disunion?” 52 Cle. St. L. Rev. 499, (2004-2005) (discussing mandatory mediation in the context of family cases); Michael Z. Green, “Proposing a New Paradigm for EEOC Enforcement after 35 Years: Outsourcing Charge Processing by Mandatory Mediation,” 105 Dick. L. Rev. 305 (2001) (discussing mandatory mediation of employment claims).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信