整形外科敷料

Tyler J. Tantillo , Brandon Klein , Michael Wilson , Kanwarpaul S. Grewal , Adam D. Bitterman , Nicholas A. Sgaglione
{"title":"整形外科敷料","authors":"Tyler J. Tantillo ,&nbsp;Brandon Klein ,&nbsp;Michael Wilson ,&nbsp;Kanwarpaul S. Grewal ,&nbsp;Adam D. Bitterman ,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Sgaglione","doi":"10.1016/j.orthop.2021.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The choice of which surgical dressing to use is an important step in the postoperative care of orthopaedic patients. This decision is influenced in part by the patient's level of activity prior to surgery, medical history, wound classification, and cost. As orthopaedic wounds are inherently complex, often overlying bony prominences, it is imperative that orthopaedic providers are aware of the dressings available and how best to deploy them.</p><p>Classified into three categories (passive, active, and interactive), orthopaedic surgical dressings can vary based upon their mechanism of action, absorptive capacity, and ability to provide wound protection. Through the activation or promotion of one of the four stages of wound healing, orthopaedic surgical dressings act to optimize postoperative wound care, leading to improved patient outcomes and a decrease in associated complications.</p><p>The combined use of multiple dressings, with varying attributes, provides the ultimate method for obtaining the ideal orthopaedic surgical dressing<em>.</em> Choosing the appropriate dressing and subsequent care regimen can prevent unnecessary hospitalizations and additional costs associated with complex wound care. Future prospective trials aimed at evaluating specific dressings and their utility in orthopaedics is warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100994,"journal":{"name":"Orthoplastic Surgery","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 9-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.orthop.2021.06.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orthopaedic surgical dressings\",\"authors\":\"Tyler J. Tantillo ,&nbsp;Brandon Klein ,&nbsp;Michael Wilson ,&nbsp;Kanwarpaul S. Grewal ,&nbsp;Adam D. Bitterman ,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Sgaglione\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orthop.2021.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The choice of which surgical dressing to use is an important step in the postoperative care of orthopaedic patients. This decision is influenced in part by the patient's level of activity prior to surgery, medical history, wound classification, and cost. As orthopaedic wounds are inherently complex, often overlying bony prominences, it is imperative that orthopaedic providers are aware of the dressings available and how best to deploy them.</p><p>Classified into three categories (passive, active, and interactive), orthopaedic surgical dressings can vary based upon their mechanism of action, absorptive capacity, and ability to provide wound protection. Through the activation or promotion of one of the four stages of wound healing, orthopaedic surgical dressings act to optimize postoperative wound care, leading to improved patient outcomes and a decrease in associated complications.</p><p>The combined use of multiple dressings, with varying attributes, provides the ultimate method for obtaining the ideal orthopaedic surgical dressing<em>.</em> Choosing the appropriate dressing and subsequent care regimen can prevent unnecessary hospitalizations and additional costs associated with complex wound care. Future prospective trials aimed at evaluating specific dressings and their utility in orthopaedics is warranted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthoplastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 9-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.orthop.2021.06.002\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthoplastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X21000233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthoplastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X21000233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

手术敷料的选择是骨科患者术后护理的重要步骤。这一决定在一定程度上受患者术前活动水平、病史、伤口分类和费用的影响。由于骨科伤口本身就很复杂,通常覆盖在骨突出部位,因此骨科医生必须了解可用的敷料以及如何最好地使用敷料。骨科手术敷料分为三大类(被动、主动和互动),根据其作用机制、吸收能力和伤口保护能力而有所不同。通过激活或促进伤口愈合的四个阶段之一,骨科手术敷料起到优化术后伤口护理的作用,从而改善患者预后并减少相关并发症。多种不同属性敷料的联合使用,为获得理想的骨科手术敷料提供了最终方法。选择合适的敷料和随后的护理方案可以防止不必要的住院治疗和与复杂伤口护理相关的额外费用。未来的前瞻性试验旨在评估特定的敷料及其在骨科中的应用是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Orthopaedic surgical dressings

The choice of which surgical dressing to use is an important step in the postoperative care of orthopaedic patients. This decision is influenced in part by the patient's level of activity prior to surgery, medical history, wound classification, and cost. As orthopaedic wounds are inherently complex, often overlying bony prominences, it is imperative that orthopaedic providers are aware of the dressings available and how best to deploy them.

Classified into three categories (passive, active, and interactive), orthopaedic surgical dressings can vary based upon their mechanism of action, absorptive capacity, and ability to provide wound protection. Through the activation or promotion of one of the four stages of wound healing, orthopaedic surgical dressings act to optimize postoperative wound care, leading to improved patient outcomes and a decrease in associated complications.

The combined use of multiple dressings, with varying attributes, provides the ultimate method for obtaining the ideal orthopaedic surgical dressing. Choosing the appropriate dressing and subsequent care regimen can prevent unnecessary hospitalizations and additional costs associated with complex wound care. Future prospective trials aimed at evaluating specific dressings and their utility in orthopaedics is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信